Recent decades have witnessed substantial expansion in both international efforts to support the development of political parties as healthy organizations, and in academic comparative studies to understand how parties’ organizational choices affect political outcomes. Despite the similarities of the concerns, the overlap of these efforts has been modest. This article considers why these developments have failed to converge, pointing to different fundamental conceptions of how political parties function and what they are for. It then illustrates this gap by considering two areas of party operations (i.e. political party finance and intra-party democracy), showing the scarcity of research support for some major assumptions that justify specific party aid prescriptions. The article concludes by considering possible ways to bridge the practitioner-researcher gap in this field of study.
Abu AnzehW (n.d) Evaluation matrix for political parties. In: Political Parties Empowerment Model. Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy.
2.
AchurySScarrowSEKosiara-PedersenK, et al. (2020) The consequences of membership incentives: do greater political benefits attract different kinds of members?Party Politics26(1): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818754603
3.
Alcántara SáezM (2004) Partidos Políticos en América Latina: precisiones Conceptuales, Estado Actual y Retos Futuros. Revista de Estudios Politicos124: 55–94.
4.
AldrichJH (1995) Why Parties? the Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
5.
AlexanderHEFedermanJ (eds) (1989) Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge University Press.
6.
AmitaiY (2024) The activists who divide us: a cross-country analysis of party activists’ influence on polarization and representation. Comparative Political Studies57(3): 453–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231169030
7.
AscencioSJChangHI (2024) Do primaries improve evaluations of public officials? Experimental evidence from Mexico. Political Behavior46(4): 2451–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09926-w
8.
AstudilloJLagoI (2021) Primaries through the looking glass: the electoral effects of opening the selection of top candidates. British Journal of Political Science51(4): 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000632
9.
AstudilloJPanequeA (2022) Do party primaries punish women? Revisiting the trade-off between the inclusion of party members and the selection of women as party leaders. Party Politics28(3): 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068821988963
10.
Ben-BassatADahanM (2015) The regulation of political finance and corruption. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy14(3): 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2014.0296
BiezenIvan (2003) Financing Political Parties and Election Campaigns – Guidelines. Council of Europe.
13.
BiezenIvanKopeckýP (2017) The paradox of party funding: the limited impact of state subsidies on party membership. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds). Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 187–207.
14.
BiezenvanISawardM (2008) Democratic theorists and party scholars: Why they don’t talk to each other, and why they should. Perspective on Politics6(1): 21–35.
15.
BolleyerN (2013) New Parties in Old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in 17 Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
BolleyerNRuthS (2018) Elite investments in party institutionalization in new democracies: a two-dimensional approach. The Journal of Politics80(1): 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/694394
17.
BruhnK (2016) Money for nothing? Public financing and party-building in Latin America. In: LevitskySLoxtonJVan DyckB, et al. (eds) Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–242.
18.
BurnellP (2017) Promoting Democracy Abroad: Policy and Performance. Routledge.
19.
BurnellPGerritsA (eds) (2013) Promoting Party Politics in Emerging Democracies. Routledge.
20.
CarothersT (2006) Confronting the Weakest Link. Aiding Political Parties in New Democracies. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
21.
Casal BértoaF (2017) It’s been mostly about money! A multi-method research approach to the sources of institutionalization. Sociological Methods & Research46(4): 683–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115588998
22.
Casal BértoaFRamaJ (2022) Paying for appeasement: on the moderating role of public subsidies in east central european party politics. Party Politics28(4): 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211015933
23.
Casal BértoaFSpirovaM (2019) Parties between thresholds: state subsidies and party behaviour in post-communist democracies. Party Politics25(2): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817710221
24.
Casal BértoaF.Heapy-SilanderA.LyngeH. (2024) Can Financial Transparency Help Parties Institutionalize and Save Democracy? Party Politics. Online First.
25.
Casal BértoaFHorncastleWLipceanS (2025) Blessing or Curse? A Critical Review of the Paradoxical Consequences of Direct Public Funding for Political Parties. European Political Science Review, Online First.
26.
Casal BértoaFMartin-RozumilowiczB, (Forthcoming). “Building Party Resilience: Improving Party Aid in an Age of Democratic Declinefalguer. Policy Studies.
27.
Casal BértoaFMolenaarFPiccioDR, et al. (2014) The world upside Down: delegitimising political finance regulation. International Political Science Review35(3): 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114523302
28.
Casas-ZamoraK (2005) Paying for Democracy: Political Finance and State Funding for Parties. Gloucester: ECPR Press.
Costa LoboMRazzuoliI (2017) Party finance and perceived party responsiveness. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–207.
32.
Council of Europe (2003) Recommendation Rec(2003)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Common Rules Against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
33.
Council of Europe (2007) Parliamentary assembly of the council of Europe (PACE). Resolution from April 7, 2007 directing Venice commission to prepare a code of good practice for political parties. Resolution1546: 2007. Available at: https://pace.coe.int/en/files/17529/html.
34.
Council of Europe (2007) Resolution 1546(2007) on The Code of Good Practice for Political Parties. Strasbourg.
35.
CoxGW (2005) The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
36.
CozzaJFSomer-TopcuZ (2021) Membership vote for party leadership changes: electoral effects and the causal mechanisms behind. Electoral Studies71: 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102326
De LucaMVenturinoF (2017) The effects of primaries on electoral performance: France and Italy in comparative perspective. French Politics15: 43–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-016-0007-4
39.
De SousaL (2019) Measuring the enforcement capacity of political financing supervisory bodies. European Political Science18(2): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0150-2
40.
DoubletYM (2012) Fighting Corruption –political Funding: Thematic Review of Greco’s Third Evaluation Round. Strasbourg: GRECO, Council of Europe.
41.
ErdmannG (2013) Political party assistance and political party research: towards a closer encounter? In: BurnellPGerritsA. Promoting Party Politics in Emerging Democracies, pp. 211-232. Routledge.
42.
EvertssonN (2013) Political corruption and electoral funding: a cross-national analysis. International Criminal Justice Review23(1): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567713476886
43.
FalgueraEJonesSOhmanM (eds) (2014) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns: A Handbook on Political Finance. Stockholm: IDEA.
44.
FazekasMCingolaniL (2017) Breaking the cycle? How (Not) to use political finance regulations to counter public procurement corruption. Slavonic and East European Review95(1): 76–116. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.1.0076
45.
FreidenbergF (2016) Los Sistemas de Partidos en América Latina. México: Universidad National Autónoma de México e Instituto Nacional Electoral.
46.
HinoA (2012) New Challenger Parties in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
47.
HuntingtonSP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
48.
IbenskasRVan De WardtM (2024) One more time? Parties’ repeated electoral entry in younger democracies. American Journal of Political Science68(3): 1122–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12777
IDEA International (1999) Code of Conduct for Political Parties: Campaigning in Democratic Elections. Stockholm: IDEA International.
51.
IDEA International (2017) Dialogue on Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Political Parties in Elections. Stockholm: IDEA International.
52.
JamalMA (2012) Democracy promotion, civil society building, and the primacy of politics. Comparative Political Studies45(1): 3–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010365998
53.
JandaK (1980) Political Parties: A Cross National Survey. New York: Free Press.
54.
JohnsonDBGibsonJR (1974) The divisive primary revisited: party activists in Iowa. American Political Science Review68(1): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959742
55.
KatsouridesYIoannidisN (2024) Intra-party leadership contests and effect on levels of satisfaction with democracy on party voters. Government and Opposition60: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2024.27
56.
KatzRSMairP (eds) (1994) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook. London: Sage.
57.
KatzRSMairP (2018) Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KitscheltH (1989) The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60.
KopeckýPMairPSpirovaM (2018) Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
Kosiara-PedersenKScarrowSEvan HauteE (2017) Rules of engagement? Party membership costs, new forms of party affiliation, and partisan participation. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–207.
62.
LawsonKMerklPH (1988) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
LipceanSCasal BértoaF (2024a) Political financing and political corruption. In: de SousaLCoroadoS (eds). Encyclopaedia of Corruption and Society. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
65.
LipceanSCasal BertoaF (2024b) “Do Political Finance Reforms Reduce Corruption? A Replication Study”, Research and Politics11(4): 1-9.
66.
LipceanSMcMenaminI (2024) Rethinking public funding of parties and corruption: confronting theoretical complexity and challenging measurement. Governance37(2): 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12782
67.
LoomesG (2013) Party Strategies in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
68.
LovenduskiJNorrisP (1993) Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
69.
MariniS (2025) Do more inclusive parties change less? Intraparty democracy and programmatic change. West European Politics48(2): 270–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2272117
70.
Martínez-CantóJ (2025) Do new participatory rights attract more party members? Evidence from Germany. Party Politics31(2): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241306736
MuriaasRMazurAGHoardS (2022) Payments and penalties for democracy: gendered electoral financing in action worldwide. American Political Science Review116(2): 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000976
73.
National Democratic Institute (2003)BrethEQuibellJ (eds) Best Practices of Effective Parties: Three Training Modules for Political Parties. Washington DC: National Democratic Institute.
74.
NohlenDZovattoDOrozcoJ, et al. (1998) Tratado de Derecho Electoral Comparado en América Latina. México FCE, Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Universidad de Heidelberg. In: International IDEA, Tribunal Electoral Del Poder Judicial De La Federación and Instituto Federal Electoral. IDEA.
75.
NorrisP (1995) May's law of curvilinear disparity revisited: leaders, officers, members and voters in British political parties. Party Politics1(1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001002
76.
NorrisP (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
77.
NorrisPAbel van EsA (eds) (2016) Checkbook Elections? Political Finance in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
78.
OhmanM (2014) Getting the political finance System right. In: FalgueraEJonesSOhmanM (eds) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns: A Handbook on Political Finance. Stockholm: IDEA.
79.
OhmanM (2018) Gender-Targeted Public Funding for Political Parties: A Comparative Analysis. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
80.
OSCE/ODIHR (2015) Handbook for the Observation of Campaign Finance. Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR.
81.
OSCE/ODIHR and Venice Commission (2020) Guidelines on Political Party Regulation, 2nd ed. Warsaw and Venice.
82.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83.
PedersenHHSchumacherG (2015) Do leadership changes improve electoral performance? In: CrossWPiletJB (eds) The Politics of Party Leadership: A cross-national Perspective. Oxford University Press, pp. 149–164.
84.
Pinto-DuschinskyM (1981) British Political Finance, 1830–1980. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.
85.
PiscopoJMHinojosaMThomasG, et al. (2022) Follow the money: gender, incumbency, and campaign funding in Chile. Comparative Political Studies55(2): 222–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024300
86.
PotterJDTavitsM (2015) The impact of campaign finance laws on party competition. British Journal of Political Science45(01): 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123413000227
87.
PowerS (2020) Party Funding and Corruption. Cham: Palgrave.
88.
PruysersSCrossWGaujaA, et al. (2017) The impact of parties on women’s representation. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford University Press, pp. 208–233.
89.
ReillyBNordlundP (eds) (2008) Political Parties in conflict-prone Societies: Regulation, Engineering and Democratic Development. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
90.
RosenblattF (2018) Party Vibrancy and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
91.
SanchesER (2018) Party Systems in Young Democracies: Varieties of Institutionalization in Sub-saharan Africa. Routledge.
92.
ScarrowSE (2006) Party subsidies and the freezing of party competition: do cartel mechanisms work?West European Politics29(4): 619–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380600842148
SchlesingerJA (1991) Political Parties and the Winning of Office. University of Michigan Press.
95.
SchwenkJ (2024) The effect of primaries on voter evaluations of candidate quality: experimental evidence. Party Politics30(5): 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231184627
96.
ShomerYPutG-JGedalya-LavyE (2016) Intra-party politics and public opinion: how candidate selection processes affect citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. Political Behavior38: 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9324-6
97.
ShomerYPutG-JGedalya-LavyE (2018) Does intra-party democracy affect levels of trust in parties? The cases of Belgium and Israel. Acta Politica53: 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-017-0044-2
98.
SmirnovaV (2018) Why make political finance transparent? Explaining the group of states against corruption (GRECO)’s success in reforming national political finance regulation. European Political Science Review10(4): 565–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773918000103
99.
SoF (2021) Don't air your dirty laundry: party leadership contests and parliamentary election outcomes. European Journal of Political Research60(1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12383
100.
SuY-P (2022) Rules for party subsidies and electoral volatility in Latin America. Latin American Research Review57(1): 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2022.9
101.
The Commonwealth (2020) Political Finance Regulation: A Best Practice Guide to Commonwealth Legislative Approaches. London.
Transparency International/TI (2024) Standards for Integrity in Political Finance. Berlin: Transparency International/TI.
104.
United Nations (2003) General Assembly Resolution 58/4 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption. New York: United Nations.
105.
Van HolsteynJMDen RidderJMKooleRA (2017) From May’s laws to May’s legacy: on the opinion structure within political parties. Party Politics23(5): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815603242
106.
Venice Commission. (European Commission for Democracy Through Law) (2009) Code of Good Practice in the Field of Political Parties and Explanatory Report CDL-AD (2009) 021. Strasbourg: Venice Commission (European Commission for Democracy Through Law).
107.
Venice Commission (European Commission for Democracy Through Law) (2015) Report on the Method of Nomination of Candidates Within Political Parties. CDL-AD (2015)020.
108.
Von BeymeK (1985) Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Translated from the 1983) German edition.
109.
von NostitzF-C (2025) New rights, new members? The consequences of intra-party primaries for membership. Party Politics31(2): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241306728
110.
WautersBKernA (2021) Does it pay off? The effects of party leadership elections on parties’ trustworthiness and appeal to voters. Political Studies69(4): 881–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720932064
111.
WebbPDScarrowSEPoguntkeT (2022) Party organization and satisfaction with democracy: inside the blackbox of linkage. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties32(1): 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1698047
112.
Westminster Foundation for Democracy (2021) The Annual Report on the State of Transparency of Political Parties in the Western Balkans for 2021: Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
YorgasonC (2025) Campaign finance vouchers do not expand the diversity of donors: evidence from Seattle. American Political Science Review119(1): 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000170
