This paper provides causal estimates of the effects of increases in the size of candidate lists on the political careers of newcomers to the political arena. We explore an exogenous discontinuity in district magnitude that allows parties to expand their candidate lists in the Brazilian open-list local elections and find that the additional candidacies are allocated to weaker candidates, mainly newcomers, who end up occupying a significant share of the additional seats. We also find that the electoral experience provided by the additional candidacies increases the number of newcomers elected in their second attempt.
AltmannC (2010) Política Local e Seleção de Candidatos a Vereador: Contribuições a Partir do Caso de Pelotas (RS) em 2008. Master’s Thesis, Mestrado em Ciências Sociais. Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas.
2.
AmesB (1995) Electoral rules, constituency pressures, and pork barrel: bases of voting in the Brazilian congress. The Journal of Politics57(2): 324–343.
3.
AnagolSFujiwaraT (2016) The runner-up effect. Journal of Political Economy124(4): 927–991.
4.
AvelinoGBidermanCDesposatoS (2022) Sources of the incumbency (dis)advantage. Brazilian Political Science Review16(1): 1–39.
5.
AvisEFerrazCFinanF, et al. (2022) Money and politics: the effects of campaign spending limits on political entry and competition. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics14(4): 167–199.
6.
BaileySR (2009) Public opinion on nonwhite underrepresentation and racial identity politics in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society51(4): 69–99.
7.
BesleyTMontalvoJGReynal-QuerolM (2011) Do educated leaders matter?The Economic Journal121(554): F205–F227.
8.
BolognesiB (2013) A seleção de candidaturas no DEM, PMDB, PSDB e PT nas eleições legislativas federais Brasileiras de 2010: percepções dos candidatos sobre a formação das listas. Revista de Sociologia e Política21(46): 45–68.
9.
BragaMdSS (2008) Organizações partidárias e seleção de candidatos no estado de São Paulo. Opinião Pública14(2): 454–485.
10.
BragaMdSSAmaralOEd (2013) Implicações do processo de seleção de candidatos na competição partidária: o caso Brasileiro. Revista de Sociologia e Política21(46): 33–43.
11.
BragaMdSSVeigaLF (2009) Eleições 2008: por quem e como são selecionadas as listas partidárias às Câmaras de Vereadores de três capitais Brasileiras. Caxambu: 33° Encontro Anual da ANPOCS.
12.
BrittoDGFiorinS (2020) Corruption and legislature size: evidence from Brazil. European Journal of Political Economy65: 101940.
13.
BrolloFNanniciniTPerottiR, et al. (2013) The political resource curse. American Economic Review103(5): 1759–1796.
14.
BuenoNSDunningT (2017) Race, resources, and representation evidence from Brazilian politicians. World Politics69: 327.
15.
BuisseretPEFolkeOPratoC, et al. (2022) Party nomination strategies in list proportional representation systems. American Journal of Political Science66(3): 714–729.
16.
CalvoEGuarnieriFLimongiF (2015) Why coalitions? Party system fragmentation, small party bias, and preferential vote in Brazil. Electoral Studies39: 219–229.
17.
CamposLAMachadoC (2015) A cor dos eleitos: determinantes da sub-representação política dos não brancos no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política16: 121–151.
18.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
19.
CarrollRNalepaM (2020) The personal vote and party cohesion: modeling the effects of electoral rules on intraparty politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(1): 36–69.
20.
CaseyKKamaraABMeriggiNF (2021) An experiment in candidate selection. American Economic Review111(5): 1575–1612.
21.
CeyhanS (2018) Who runs at the top of party lists? Determinants of parties’ list ranking in the 2013 German Bundestag election. German Politics27(1): 66–88.
22.
CheibubJASinG (2015) Order in chaos intra party coordination in open list pr systems. In: 72nd annual midwest political science association conference,Chicago, IL, April3-6, pp. 1–18.
23.
CheibubJASinG (2020) Preference vote and intra-party competition in open list pr systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(1): 70–95.
24.
CironeACoxGWFivaJH (2021) Seniority-based nominations and political careers. American Political Science Review115(1): 234–251.
25.
CorbiRPapaioannouESuricoP (2019) Regional transfer multipliers. The Review of Economic Studies86(5): 1901–1934.
26.
CoxGWFivaJHSmithDM, et al. (2021) Moral hazard in electoral teams: List rank and campaign effort. Journal of Public Economics Forthcoming.
27.
CrottyWJ (1968) The party organization and its activities. In: CrottyWJ (ed). Approaches to the Study of Party Organization. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 247–306.
28.
DesposatoSW (2006) Parties for rent? Ambition, ideology, and party switching in Brazil’s chamber of deputies. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 62–80.
29.
EggersACFreierRGrembiV, et al. (2018) Regression discontinuity designs based on population thresholds: pitfalls and solutions. American Journal of Political Science62(1): 210–229.
30.
FerrazCFinanF (2009) Motivating Politicians: The Impacts of Monetary Incentives on Quality and Performance. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
FirpoSFrançaMPortellaA, et al. (2022) Racial Inequality in Brazilian elections. Available at SSRN 4111691.
32.
FivaJHRøhrHL (2018) Climbing the ranks: incumbency effects in party-list systems. European Economic Review101: 142–156.
33.
FoxRLLawlessJL (2005) To run or not to run for office: explaining nascent political ambition. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 642–659.
34.
GalassoVNanniciniT (2011) Competing on good politicians. American Political Science Review105(1): 79–99.
35.
GalassoVNanniciniT (2017) Political selection under alternative electoral rules. Public Choice171(3–4): 257–281.
36.
GallagherMMarshM (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.
37.
GelmanAImbensG (2019) Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics37(3): 447–456.
38.
Gonzalez-EirasMSanzC (2021) Women’s representation in politics: the effect of electoral systems. Journal of Public Economics198: 104399.
39.
GóreckiMAKukołowiczP (2014) Gender quotas candidate background and the election of women: a paradox of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems. Electoral Studies36: 65–80.
40.
GuarnieriF (2004) Partidos, Seleção de Candidatos e Comportamento Político. Master’s Thesis, Mestrado em Ciência Política. USP, São Paulo.
41.
GulzarS (2021) Who enters politics and why?Annual Review of Political Science24: 253–275.
42.
HaimeAAgustínVLeslieSB (2022) Candidate experience and electoral success. Latin American Research Review57(1): 170–187.
43.
JanuszA (2018) Candidate race and electoral outcomes: evidence from Brazil. Politics, Groups, and Identities6(4): 702–724.
44.
JanuszACamposLA (2021) Candidate advertisements and Afro-Brazilian political marginalization. Latin American Research Review56(4): 761–778.
45.
JanuszASellsC (2022) Race and campaign resources: candidate identification numbers in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America14(2): 211–223.
46.
ImbensGWLemieuxT (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 615–635.
47.
JohnsonOA (1998) Racial representation and Brazilian politics: black members of the national congress, 1983-1999. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs40(4): 97–118.
48.
JonesBFOlkenBA (2005) Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. The Quarterly Journal of Economics120(3): 835–864.
49.
JonesMPAllesSTchintianC (2012) Cuotas de género, leyes electorales y elección de legisladoras en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago)32(2): 331–357.
50.
KinzoMD (2005) Os partidos no eleitorado: percepções públicas e laços partidários no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais20: 65–81.
51.
LaaksoMReinT (1979) Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
52.
LewisBD (2018) Endogenous district magnitude and political party fragmentation in subnational Indonesia: a research note. Electoral Studies55: 136–145.
53.
LimaRNdBarretoA (2014) A carreira de vereador e a ambição progressiva: análise a partir do caso do Rio Grande do Sul (2002-2010). Pensamento Plural9(12): 91–115.
54.
LitschigSMorrisonKM (2013) The impact of intergovernmental transfers on education outcomes and poverty reduction. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics5(4): 206–240.
55.
LopezFG (2004) A política cotidiana dos vereadores e as relações entre executivo e legislativo em âmbito municipal: o caso do município de Araruama. Revista de Sociologia e Política12(22): 153–177.
56.
LundellK (2004) Determinants of candidate selection: the degree of centralization in comparative perspective. Party Politics10(1): 25–47.
57.
LyytikäinenTTukiainenJ (2019) Are voters rational?European Journal of Political Economy59: 230–242.
58.
LucardiA (2019) The effect of district magnitude on electoral outcomes: evidence from two natural experiments in Argentina. British Journal of Political Science49(2): 557–577.
59.
LucardiAMicozziJP (2022) District magnitude and female representation: evidence from Argentina and Latin America. American Journal of Political Science66(2): 318–336.
60.
MagalhaesLHirvonenS (2015) Multi-offce Incumbency Advantage: Political Careers in Brazil. Working Paper No. 15/662. UK: Department of Economics, University of Bristol.
61.
MainwaringS (1991) Políticos, partidos e sistemas eleitorais. Novos Estudos29: 34–58.
62.
MarquesJEDC (2007) Na Busca Dos Novos Líderes: o Processo de Construção de Candidaturas ao Legislativo Municipal Aspectos Teóricos e um Estudo de Caso. Master’s Thesis, Mestrado em Ciências Sociais. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos.
63.
MatlandRE (1993) Institutional variables affecting female representation in national legislatures: the case of Norway. The Journal of Politics55(3): 737–755.
64.
MattozziAMerloA (2015) Mediocracy. Journal of Public Economics130: 32–44.
65.
McCraryJ (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 698–714.
66.
MeiraJM (2020) How to Close an Open-List: Party Dynamics in the Brazilian Electoral System. PhD Thesis, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Rio de Janeiro.
67.
MeirelesF (2019) Political careers in the house of representatives: a quasi-experimental analysis. Dados62(4): 1–38.
68.
MeirelesFAndradeLVR (2017) Magnitude eleitoral e representação de mulheres nos municípios Brasileiros. Revista de Sociologia e Política25(63): 79–101.
69.
MershonC (2020) Challenging the wisdom on preferential proportional representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(1): 168–182.
70.
MessiasG (2019) Carreira e ambição política dos vereadores de Salvador (1997-2012). Revista de Sociologia e Política27(72): 1–25.
71.
MichelsR (1915) Political Parties. London: Jarrold & Sons.
72.
MiguelLF (2003) Capital político e carreira eleitoral: algumas variáveis na eleição para o congresso Brasileiro. Revista de Sociologia e Política11(20): 115–134.
73.
MiguelLF (2008) Political representation and gender in Brazil: Quotas for women and their impact. Bulletin of Latin American Research27(2): 197–214.
74.
NiemiRGHsiehJF (2002) Counting candidates: an alternative to the effective N: with an application to the M+1 rule in Japan. Party Politics8(1): 75–99.
75.
NollMILealCdS (2008) A política local na construção da carreira política: o caso dos vereadores (São Paulo, Fortaleza e Porto Alegre). ENCONTRO DA ABCP6.
76.
PerissinottoRBolognesiB (2010) Electoral success and political institutionalization in the federal deputy elections in Brazil (1998, 2002 and 2006). Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)4(1): 10–32.
77.
PowerTJ (1991) Politicized democracy: competition, institutions, and “civic fatigue” in Brazil. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs33(3): 75–112.
78.
RibeiroPF (2013) Organização e poder nos partidos Brasileiros: uma análise dos estatutos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política10: 225–265.
79.
RodriguesLM (2009) Mudanças Na Classe Política Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein.
80.
SakuraiSNMenezes-FilhoNA (2008) Fiscal policy and reelection in Brazilian municipalities. Public Choice137(1–2): 301–314.
SamuelsD (1997) Determinantes do voto partidário em sistemas eleitorais centrados no candidato: evidências sobre o Brasil. Dados40: 493–535.
83.
SamuelsD (2003) Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
SchlesingerJA (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
86.
ScullyTR (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
87.
ShomerY (2014) What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics20(4): 533–546.
88.
SilottoG (2019) A relevância regional nas estratégias partidárias: evidências das listas de candidatos de São Paulo. Revista de Sociologia e Política27: 1–17.
89.
SingerMGershmanZ (2018) Do changes in district magnitude affect electoral fragmentation? Evidence over time at the district level. Electoral Studies54: 172–181.
90.
SvitákováKSoltésM (2020) Sorting of candidates: evidence from 20,000 electoral ballots. CERGE-EI Working Paper Series 652.
91.
OliveiraRLDa SilvaVA (2020) The gender gap in Brazilian politics and the role of the electoral court. Politics & Gender16(2): 409–437.
92.
ThamesFCWilliamsMS (2010) Incentives for personal votes and women’s representation in legislatures. Comparative Political Studies43(12): 1575–1600.
93.
WylieKDos SantosP (2016) A law on paper only: electoral rules, parties, and the persistent underrepresentation of women in Brazilian legislatures. Politics & Gender12(3): 415.
94.
ZuccoCPowerTJ (2021) Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics53(3): 477–500.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
