Unequal Resources,Unequal Careers: The Role of Campaign Financing in the Gender Gap in Candidates’ Persistence in Brazil

Abstract

Do female candidates give up running for office after losing more readily than their male counter-parts? I address this question by employing a regression discontinuity between last winners and first losers in city council elections in Brazil. The results show that losing an election diminishes the chances of running again for both genders. However, the effect is large for women. I offer an explanation for this gender gap in rerunning by developing a model based on the distribution of campaign financial resources among candidates. I argue that female candidates receive fewer financial resources from donors and their political parties than male candidates. Consequently, to run for office, women often need to use more of their own money. This leads to a faster depletion of their personal financial resources and, ultimately, a greater likelihood of them dropping out of politics. The argument is supported by evidence on campaign financing for the same period.

Keywords

gender representation rerunning open list-proportional representation Brazil

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

Cunow

Desposato

. 2015. “Choice Sets, Gender, and Candidate Choice in Brazil.” Electoral Studies 39: 230–242.

Anagol

Fujiwara

. 2016. “The Runner-Up Effect.” Journal of Political Economy 124 (4): 927–991.

Araújo

. 2013. “Cotas Femininas e Financiamento de Campanha.” Cadernos Adenauer 14 (3): 11–30.

Barnes

T. D.

Burchard

S. M.

. 2013. “‘Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 767–790.

Bernhard

de Benedictis-Kessner

. 2021. “Men and Women Candidates Are Similarly Persistent After Losing Elections.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118: 26.

Biroli

2016. “Political Violence Against Women in Brazil: Expressions and Definitions.” Revista Direito e Práxis 7 (15): 557–589.

Biroli

2018. “Reação Conservadora, Democracia e Conhecimento.” Revista de Antropologia 61 (1): 83–94.

Bohn

S. R.

2023. “Women and Candidate Quality in the Elections for the Senate: Brazil and the United States in Comparative Perspective.” Brazilian Political Science Review 1: 74–107.

Bratton

K. A.

Ray

L. P.

. Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science. 2002; 42(2): 428–437.

10.

Brown

A. R.

2013. “Does Money Buy Votes? The Case of Self-Financed Gubernatorial Candidates, 1998-2008.” Political Behavior 35 (1): 21–41.

11.

Brown

Mansour

O’Connell

S. D.

Reeves

. Gender Differences in Political Career Progression: Evidence from U.S. Elections. SSRN, 2021.

12.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Titiunik

. 2014a. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82 (6): 2295–2326.

13.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Titiunik

. 2014b. “Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Stata Journal 14 (4): 909–946.

14.

Campos Fernandez Hott

H. A.

Menezes-Filho

. Length of Candidate Lists and Political Careers: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Brazil. Party Politics, 2023.

15.

Canon

D. T.

1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1119–1141.

16.

Carroll

S. J.

Sanbonmatsu

. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

17.

Celis

Childs

. Feminist Democratic Representation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.

18.

Chattopadhyay

Duflo

. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–1443.

19.

Dahlerup

(ed). Women, Quotas and Politics. New York: Routledge, 2006.

20.

Dolan

Shah

. 2020. “She Persisted: Gender, Electoral Loss, and the Decision to Run Again.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 957–966.

21.

Escobar-Lemmon

Taylor-Robinson

M. M.

. How do candidate recruitment and selection processes affect the representation of women? In: Siavelis

P. M.

Morgenstern

(eds) Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008, pp. 345–368.

22.

Fox

R. L.

Lawless

J. L.

. 2010. “If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–326.

23.

Fraga

B. L.

Hassell

H. J.

. 2021. “Are Minority and Women Candidates Penalized by Party Politics? Race, Gender, and Access to Party Support.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (3): 540–555.

24.

Franceschet

Krook

M. L.

Piscopo

J. M.

. The Impact of Gender Quotas. OUP USA, 2012.

25.

Fulton

S. A.

Maestas

C. D.

Maisel

L. S.

Stone

W. J.

. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–248.

26.

Gavan-Koop

Smith

P. J.

. 2008. “Gendering Local Governing: Canadian and Comparative Lessons–The Case of Metropolitan Vancouver.” Canadian Political Science Review 2 (3): 152–171.

27.

Giraudy

Moncada

Snyder

. 2021. “El Análisis Subnacional: Aportes Teóricos y Metodológicos a la Política Comparada.” Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 41 (1): 1–34.

28.

Górecki

M. A.

Kukołowicz

. 2014. “Gender Quotas, Candidate Background and the Election of Women: A Paradox of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems.” Electoral Studies 36: 65–80.

29.

Haime

Vallejo

Schwindt-Bayer

. 2022. “Candidate Experience and Electoral Success.” Latin American Research Review 57 (1): 170–187.

30.

Hogan

R. E.

. 2007. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1092–1105.

31.

Imbens

Kalyanaraman

. 2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.” The Review of Economic Studies 79 (3): 933–959.

32.

Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) . 2022. https://www.ipu.org/.

33.

Janusz

Barreiro

S.-N.

Cintron

. Political Parties and Campaign Resource Allocation: Gender Gaps in Brazilian Elections. Party Politics. 2021; 28(5): 854–864.

34.

Jenkins

2007. “A Woman’s Work is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort Among Female State Legislative Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 230–239.

35.

Jones

M. P.

2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 56–81.

36.

Jones

M. P.

Navia

. 1999. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Electoral Systems.” Social Science Quarterly 80: 341–355.

37.

Kanthak

Woon

. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595–612.

38.

Krebs

T. B.

1999. “The Political and Demographic Predictors of Candidate Emergence in City Council Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (2): 279–300.

39.

Lawless

J. L.

Fox

R. L.

. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

40.

Mack

W. R.

. 1998. “Repeat Challengers: Are They the Best Challengers Around?” American Politics Research 26 (3): 308–343.

41.

Moisés

J. A.

Sanchez

B. R.

. Women’s Political Representation in Brazil. Gender and Power: Towards Equality and Democratic Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 11–34.

42.

Murray

2014. “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 520–532.

43.

Norris

Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

44.

Peixoto

V. d. M.

Marques

L. M.

Ribeiro

L. M.

. 2022. “Financiamento de Campanhas e Desempenho Eleitoral das Mulheres nas Eleições Brasileiras (1998–2020).” Estudos Avançados 36: 93–116.

45.

Phillips

The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

46.

Pinto

C. R. J.

Silveira

. 2018. “Mulheres Com Carreiras Políticas Longevas No Legislativo Brasileiro (1950-2014).” Opinião Pública 24: 178–208.

47.

Piscopo

J. M.

Hinojosa

Thomas

Siavelis

P. M.

. 2022. “Follow the Money: Gender, Incumbency, and Campaign Funding in Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 55 (2): 222–253.

48.

Piscopo

J. M.

Kenny

. 2020. “Rethinking the Ambition Gap: Gender and Candidate Emergence in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 3 (1): 3–10.

49.

Roberds

S. C.

Roberts

J. M.

. 2002. “Are All Amateurs Equal? Candidate Quality in the 1992-1998 House Elections.” Politics and Policy 30 (3): 482–501.

50.

Samuels

Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies: Theory and Evidence from Brazil. Comparative Politics. 2001a; 34(1): 23–42.

51.

Samuels

2001b. “Incumbents and Challengers on a Level Playing Field: Assessing the Impact of Campaign Finance in Brazil.” Journal of Politics 63 (2): 569–584.

52.

Samuels

2001c. “Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 43 (2): 27–48.

53.

Samuels

Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

54.

Schaefer

B. M.

Barbosa

T. A. L.

. Pagando Do Próprio Bolso: Autofinanciamento Eleitoral No Rio Grande Do Sul (2012–2016). Paraná Eleitoral. 2019; 8(1): 35–60.

55.

Schneider

M. C.

Holman

M. R.

Diekman

A. B.

McAndrew

. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–531.

56.

Schwindt-Bayer

L. A.

2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 5–28.

57.

Schwindt-Bayer

L. A.

Malecki

Crisp

B. F.

. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693–709.

58.

Sevi

Is Incumbency Advantage Gendered?

Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2022; 48(1): 145–163.

59.

Söderlund

von Schoultz

. Trajectories of the Personal Vote Under Open-List Proportional Representation: Evidence from Finland, 1999-2019. Party Politics. 2023; 30(1): 12–23.

60.

Speck

B. W.

2006. “O Financiamento de Campanhas Eleitorais.” In Reforma Política no Brasil, edited by Horizonte

Belo

, 153–158. UFMG: PNUD.

61.

Speck

B. W.

Mancuso

W. P.

. 2014. “A Study on the Impact of Campaign Finance, Political Capital, and Gender on Electoral Performance.” Brazilian Political Science Review 8 (1): 34–57.

62.

Squire

Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in US Senate Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1992; 247–263.

63.

Steen

J. A.

Self-Financed Candidates in Congressional Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009.

64.

Suárez-Cao

Batlle

Wills-Otero

. 2017. “El Auge de los Estudios sobre la Política Subnacional Latinoamericana.” Colombia Internacional 90: 15–34.

65.

Thomsen

D. M.

“Gender Differences in Candidate Reemergence.” Working Paper, 2018.

66.

Wasserman

2018. “Gender Differences in Politician Persistence.” SSRN.

67.

Wasserman

2021. “Up the Political Ladder: Gender Parity in the Effects of Electoral Defeats.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 111: 169–173.

68.

Windett

2014. “Differing Paths to the Top: Gender, Ambition, and Running for Governor.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 35 (4): 287–314.

69.

Wolak

2020. “Descriptive Representation and the Political Engagement of Women.” Politics and Gender 16 (2): 339–362.

70.

Wylie

Santos

P. d.

Marcelino

. 2019. “Extreme Non-Viable Candidates and Quota Maneuvering in Brazilian Legislative Elections.” Opinião Pública 25 (1): 1–28.

71.

Wylie

K. N.

Party Institutionalization and Women’s Representation in Democratic Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB