While many argue populist radical-right parties to be the largest contemporary threat to democracy, much of the evidence either focuses on the rare case of a populist radical-right prime minister, or conflates right-populist prime ministers with right-populist government participation, with some asserting that it would be difficult for these parties to have any real effect without holding the prime ministership. In this paper I conduct a large-scale analysis of European nations to quantify the effect right-populist junior coalition partners have on liberal democracy. I argue that as junior coalition partners, they will indeed affect democratic quality, albeit in ways that differ from that of a right-populist prime minister. While previous literature has demonstrated that populist radical-right parties bring with them decreases in the level of democratic quality pertaining to institutional constraints on power and mass civil liberties, junior coalition partners are only able to effect the latter.
Abou-ChadiTKrauseW (2018) The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science50(3): 1–19.
2.
AixaláJFabroG (2009) economic freedom, civil liberties, political rights and growth: a causality analysis. Spanish Economic Review11(3): 165–178.
3.
Bar-OnT (2018) The Radical Right and Nationalism. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeckNKatzJN (2011) Modeling dynamics in time-series–cross-section political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science14(1): 331–352.
5.
BeckNLKatzJNMignozzettiUG (2014) Of Nickell Bias and Its Cures: Comment on Gaibulloev, Sandler, and Sul. Political Analysis22(2): 274–278.
6.
BetzH-G (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BichayN (2020) Public Campaign Financing and the Rise of Radical-Right Parties. Electoral Studies66: 102159.
8.
BichayN (2021) Portfolio Distributions of Radical-Right Cabinet Ministers. London: Center for Analysis of the Radical Right.
9.
BjerkemJ (2016) The norwegian progress party: an established populist party. European View15(2): 233–243.
10.
BolleyerN (2007) Small parties: from party pledges to government policy. West European Politics30(1): 121–147.
11.
BrücknerMGrünerHP (2010) Economic Growth and the Rise of Political Extremism: Theory and Evidence. London: CEPR Discussion Papers.
12.
BugaričB (2015) A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-communist europe: ’lands in-between’ democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law13(1): 219–245.
13.
CianettiLDawsonJHanleyS (2018) Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in central and Eastern Europe–looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics34(3): 243–256.
14.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. London: Yale University Press.
15.
DahlRA (1983) Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. London: Yale University Press.
16.
De LangeSLAkkermanT (2012) “Populist parties in Belgium: A case of hegemonic liberal democracy?” In: MuddeCRovira KatwasserC (eds) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DunphyRBaleT (2011) The radical left in coalition government: towards a comparative measurement of success and failure. Party Politics17(4): 488–504.
18.
FallendF (2012) Populism in government: the case of Austria (2000–2007). In: MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (eds) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GolderM (2016) Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science19: 477497.
20.
HanKJ (2016) Income inequality and voting for radical right-wing parties. Electoral Studies42: 54–64.
21.
HouleCKennyPD (2018) the political and economic consequences of populist rule in Latin America. Government and Opposition53(2): 256–287.
22.
HuberRASchimpfCH (2016) A drunken guest in Europe?Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft10(2): 103–129.
23.
JuonABochslerD (2020) Hurricane or fresh breeze? disentangling the populist effect on the quality of democracy. European Political Science Review12(3): 391–408.
24.
KallisA (2018) The radical right and islamophobia. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
KaltwasserCRTaggartP (2016) Dealing with populists in government: a framework for analysis. Democratization23(2): 201–220.
26.
KennyPD (2020) The enemy of the people”: populists and press freedom. Political Research Quarterly73(2): 261–275.
27.
LaverMShepsleKA (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MartinLWVanbergG (2011) Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MeretS (2010) The danish people’s party, the Italian northern league and the Austrian freedom party in a comparative perspective: party ideology and electoral support. Doctoral Dissertation. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
30.
MinkenbergM (2001) The radical right in public office: agenda-setting and policy effects. West European Politics24(4): 1–21.
31.
MinkenbergM (2003) The renewal of the radical-right: between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition35(2): 170–188.
32.
MuddeC (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
33.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MuddeC (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 1–19.
35.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2012) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MullerJ-W (2016) What Is Populism?. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
NickellS (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica49(6): 1417–1426.
38.
PappasT (2019) Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
RooduijnMVan KesselSFroioC, et al. (2019) The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. Reading: University of Reading.
40.
RydgrenJ (2017) Radical right-wing parties in Europe What’s populism got to do with it?Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 485–496.
41.
SchmitterPCKarlTL (1991) What democracy Isand is not. Journal of Democracy2(3): 75–88.
42.
UrbinatiN (2019) Political theory of populism. Annual Review of Political Science22: 111–127.
43.
VaccaroA (2021) Comparing measures of democracy: statistical properties, convergence, and interchangeability. European Political Science20(4): 666–684.
44.
ValiverronenESaikkonenS (2021) science communicators intimidated: researchers’ freedom of expression and the rise of authoritarian populism. Journal of Science Communication20(4).
Vlaams Blok (2004b) Een Toekomst Voor Vlaanderen. Belgium: Vlaams Blok.
47.
ZasloveA (2004a) Closing the door? the ideology and impact of radical right populism on immigration policy in Austria and Italy. Journal of Political Ideologies9(1): 99–118.
48.
ZasloveA (2004b) The dark side of European Politics: unmasking the radical right. Journal of European Integration26(1): 61–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
