In recent years, pessimism about plebiscitary intra-party democracy has been challenged by assembly-based models of intra-party democracy. However, research has yet to explore the emergence of new power dynamics in parties originating from the implementation of deliberative practices in their intra-party democracy. We investigate how deliberative democratization reshuffles power relations within political parties through a case study of Agora, an internally deliberative movement party in Belgium. Employing a process-tracing approach using original interview and participant observation data, we argue that while plebiscitary intra-party democracy shifts power towards passive members prone to elite domination, our case suggests that deliberative intra-party democracy shifts power towards active members that are more likely to be critical of elites.
AylottNBolinN (eds), Managing Leader Selection in European Political Parties (2021) Cham: Palgrave and Macmillan.
2.
BeachDPedersenR (2019) Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
3.
BilleL (2001) Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or Reality?: Candidate selection in Western European Parties, 1960-1990. Party Politics7(3): 363–380.
4.
BolleyerNCorreaP (2020) Member influence and involvement in civil society organizations: a resource dependency perspective on groups and parties. Political Studies70: 519–540. Epub ahead of print 19 November 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720968018
5.
BolleyerNLittleCvon NostitzF-C, et al. (2015) Implementing democratic equality in political parties: organizational consequences in the Swedish and the German Pirate Parties. Scandinavian Political Studies38(2): 158–178.
6.
BonottiMStojanovićN (2022) Multilingual parties and the ethics of partisanship. The Journal of Politics84(1): 470–482.
7.
CaianiMPadoanEMarinoB (2021) Candidate Selection, Personalization and Different Logics of Centralization in New Southern European Populism: The Cases of Podemos and the M5S. Government and Opposition. Epub ahead of print 08 April 2021. doi:10.1017/gov.2021.9
8.
CartyRK (2004) Parties as Franchise systems: the stratarchical organizational imperative. Party Politics10(1): 5–24.
9.
ChambersS (2003) Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science6(1): 307–326.
10.
CeronA (2012) Bounded oligarchy: How and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking. Electoral Studies31(4): 689–701.
11.
CrossWPBlaisA (2012) Who selects the party leader?Party Politics18(2): 127–150.
12.
CrossWPKatzRS (2013) The Challenges of Intra-party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
CuratoNNiemeyerSDryzekJ, et al. (2013) Appreciative and contestatory inquiry in deliberative forums: can group hugs be dangerous?Critical Policy Studies7(1): 1–17.
14.
della PortaD, et al. (2017) Movement Parties against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
della PortaD (2020) How Social Movements Can Save Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
della PortaDDianiM (2020) Social Movements: An Introduction. 3th edn. London: Blackwell.
17.
della PortaD (2021) Communication in progressive movement parties: against populism and beyond digitalism. Information, Communication & Society24(10): 1344–1360.
18.
DeseriisMVittoriD (2019) The impact of online participation platforms on the internal democracy of two Southern European parties: Podemos and the Five-Star Movement. International Journal of Communication13: 5696–5714.
19.
DeseriisM (2020) Two variants of the digital party: The platform party and the networked party. Partecipazione e Conflitto13(1): 896–917.
20.
DillardKN (2013) Envisioning the role of facilitation in public deliberation. Journal of Applied Communication Research41(3): 217–235.
21.
DodeigneJPiletJB (2021) Centralized or decentralized personalization? Measuring intra-party competition in open and flexible list PR systems. Party Politics27(2): 234–245.
22.
DryzekJ (2000) Deliberative Democracy and beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Faucher (2021) An anthropology of contemporary political parties: Reflexions on methods and theory. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization21(2): 53–75.
24.
FreemanJ (1972) The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology17: 151–164.
25.
GaujaA (2013) The Politics of Party Policy: From Members to Legislators. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
GaujaAKosiara-PedersenK (2021) The comparative study of political party organization: changing perspectives and prospects. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization21(2): 19–52.
27.
GadN (2020) A “new political culture”: the challenges of deliberation in Alternativet. European Political Science19(2): 190–199.
28.
GerbaudoP (2021) Are digital parties more democratic than traditional parties? Evaluating Podemos and Movimento 5 Stelle’s online decision-making platforms. Party Politics27(4): 730–742.
29.
GerberM (2015) Equal Partners in Dialogue? Participation Equality in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis). Political Studies63(S1): 110–130.
30.
GherghinaSSoareSJacquetV, et al. (2020) Deliberative democracy and political parties: functions and consequences. European Political Science19(2): 200–211.
31.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
HustedEMoufahimMFredrikssonM (2021) Welcome to the party. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization21(2): 1–17.
33.
IgnaziP (2018) The four knights of intra-party democracy: A rescue for party delegitimation. Party Politics26(1): 9–20.
34.
Invernizzi-AccettiCWolkensteinF (2017) The crisis of party democracy, cognitive mobilization, and the case for making parties more deliberative. American Political Science Review111(1): 97–109.
35.
JandaK (1980) Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press.
36.
JuniusNCaluwaertsDMatthieuJ, et al. (2021) Hacking the representative system through deliberation? The organization of the Agora party in Brussels. Acta Politica. Epub ahead of print 29 November 2021. DOI: 10.1057/s41269-021-00226-3
37.
KamenovaV (2021) Internal democracy in populist right parties: the process of party policy development in the Alternative for Germany. European Political Science Review13(4): 488–505.
38.
KatzRSMairP (1993) The evolution of party organizations in Europe: The three faces of party organization. American Review of Politics14(4): 593–617.
39.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
40.
KenigO (2009) Democratization of party leadership selection: do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?Electoral Studies28(2): 240–247.
41.
LeDucL (2001) Democratizing party leadership selection. Party Politics7(3): 323–341.
42.
LoxboK (2013) The fate of intra-party democracy: leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics19(4): 537–554.
43.
LupiaANortonA (2017) Inequality is Always in the Room: Language & Power in Deliberative Democracy. Daedalus146(3): 64–76.
44.
MüllerWCStrømK (eds), How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
NunesRG (2021) Neither Vertical Nor Horizontal: A Theory of Organization. London: Verso Books.
46.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties. Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PedersenH (2012) What do Parties Want? Policy versus Office. West European Politics35(4): 896–910.
48.
PiletJBCrossW (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. London: Routledge.
49.
PizzimentiECalossiECicchiL (2022) Removing the intermediaries? Patterns of intra-party organizational change in Europe (1970–2010). Acta Politica57(1): 191–209.
50.
RahatGKenigO (2018) From Party Politics to Personalized Politics?: Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
RahatGShapiraA (2017) An intra-party democracy index: theory, design and a demonstration. Parliamentary Affairs70(1): 84–110.
52.
RandallVSvåsandL (2002) Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics8(1): 5–29.
53.
RihouxB (2016) Green party organisations: the difficult path from amateur-activist to professional-electoral logics. In: Van HauteE (ed), Green Parties in Europe. Abington: Routledge, pp. 298–314.
54.
SandersLM (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory25(3): 347–376.
55.
ScarrowSE (2005) Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Implementing Intra-party Democracy. Wahsington DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
56.
Schumacher G De Vries CE VisBde VriesCE (2013) Why do parties change position? party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics75(2): 464–477.
57.
SchumacherGGigerN (2017) Who leads the party? on membership size, selectorates and party oligarchy. Political Studies65(1): 162–181.
58.
TeorellJ (1999) A deliberative defence of intra-party democracy. Party Politics5(3): 363–382.
59.
VittoriD (2017) Podemos and the five stars movement: divergent trajectories in a similar crisis. Constellations24(3): 324–338.
60.
VodováPVodaP (2020) The effects of deliberation in Czech pirate party: the case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science19(2): 181–189.
61.
von dem BergeBPoguntkeT (2017) Varieties of intra-party democracy. In: PoguntkeT (eds), Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 136–157.
62.
WolkensteinF (2016) A deliberative model of intra‐party democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy24(3): 297–320.
63.
WolkensteinF (2018) Intra-party democracy beyond aggregation. Party Politics24(4): 323–334.
64.
YoungIM (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
