Although the position of the party on the ground has been weakened by cartelization, grassroots activists remain an important recruitment pool for political professionals. Based on unique survey data collected among the staff of 14 Belgian and Dutch parties (N = 1009), this article offers an in-depth analysis of party activism among this under-researched population. Introducing a new supply and demand framework, I argue that staff recruitment is shaped by candidate preferences (supply) and party preferences (demand). The findings demonstrate that most political staffers are high-intensity activists with a strong commitment to their party. Moreover, the theoretical model accurately predicts that non-activists are more common among policy and communication experts, ministerial staff, and those working for ideologically moderate parties. These findings show that paid staffers do not necessarily widen the gap between parties and activists. They also raise normative questions about internal congruence within parties in coalition governments.
BaertS (2018) Hiring discrimination: an overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. In: GaddisSM (ed), Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes With Theory, Method, and Nuance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 63–77.
2.
BakkerRHoogheLJollySMarksGPolkJRovnyJSteenbergenM, and VachudovaMA (2020) “2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey.” Version 2019.1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina. Available at:chesdata.eu (accessed 2 June 2020).
3.
BransMPelgrimsCHoetD (2006) Comparative observations on tensions between professional policy advice and political control in the Low Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences72: 57–71.
4.
BruterMHarrisonS (2009) The Future of Our Democracies. Young Party Members in Europe. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BusbyABelkacemK (2013) ‘Coping with the information overload’: an exploration of assistants’ backstage role in the everyday practice of European Parliament politics.
6.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14: 417–439.
7.
ConnaughtonB (2010) ‘Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists’: a classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies25: 347–369.
8.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2020) Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
DevroeRde VetBWautersB (2017) De partijbasis als microkosmos? De representativiteit van partijleden onderzocht. In: WautersB (ed), Wie is nog van de Partij? Crisis en Toekomst van Partijleden in Vlaanderen. Leuven: Acco, pp. 23–42.
10.
DickinsonMJTenpasKD (2002) Explaining increasing turnover rates among presidential advisers, 1929–1997. Journal of Politics64: 434–448.
11.
DommettKKeffordGPowerS (2020) The digital ecosystem: the new politics of party organization in parliamentary democracies. Party Politics: 1354068820907667.
12.
EriksonJVergeT (2020) Gender, power and privilege in the parliamentary workplace. Parliamentary Affairs.
13.
FarrellDM (1996) Campaign strategies and tactics. In: NorrisPNiemiRGLeDucL (eds) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 160–183.
14.
FarrellDMWebbP (2002) Political parties as campaign organizations. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–128.
15.
FarrellDMKolodnyRMedvicS (2001) Parties and campaign professionals in a digital age political consultants in the United States and their counterparts overseas. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics6: 11–30.
16.
FisherJWebbP (2003) Political participation: the vocational motivations of Labour Party employees. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations5: 166–187.
17.
GallagherMMitchellP (2005) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 662.
18.
GouglasABransMJaspersS (2015) Political Advisers and Policy Making in Ministerial Cabinet Systems: The Case of Belgium, Greece & the European Commission. International Conference on Public Policy, Milan, Italy, 1–4 July 2015.
19.
HeidarKWautersBePS (2019) Do Parties Still Represent? An Analysis of the Representativeness of Political Parties in Western Democracies. London: Routledge.
20.
Hertel-FernandezAMildenbergerMStokesLC (2018) Legislative staff and representation in Congress. American Political Science Review113: 1–18.
21.
HustedtTSalomonsenHH (2014) Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences80: 746–765.
22.
HustedtTKolltveitKSalomonsenHH (2017) Ministerial advisers in executive government: out from the dark and into the limelight. Public Administration95: 299–311.
23.
KarlsenRSaglieJ (2017) Party bureaucrats, independent professionals, or politicians? A study of party employees. West European Politics40: 1331–1351.
24.
KatzRMairP (1993) The evolution of party organizations in Europe: the three faces of party organization. The American Review of Politics14: 593–617.
25.
KatzRMairP (1995) Changing models of party organisation and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1: 5–28.
26.
KatzRMairP (2002) The ascendancy of the party in public office: party organizational change in twentieth-century democracies. In: GuntherRMonteroJRLinzJJ (eds) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–135.
27.
KatzRMairP (2009) The cartel party thesis: a restatement. Perspectives on Politics7: 753–766.
28.
KatzRS (2001) The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics7: 277–296.
29.
KöllnA-K (2015) The effects of membership decline on party organisations in Europe. European Journal of Political Research54: 707–725.
30.
KopeckýPMairPSpirovaM (2012) Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
KrouwelA (2012) Party Transformations in European Democracies. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
32.
LandgraveMWellerN (2020) Do more professionalized legislatures discriminate less? The role of staffers in constituency service. American Politics Research48: 571–578.
33.
LaubeSSchankJSchefferT (2020) Constitutive invisibility: exploring the work of staff advisers in political position-making. Social Studies of Science50: 292–316.
34.
LijphartA (1984) Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
35.
LupiaA (2003) Delegation and its perils. In: StromKMüllerWBergmanT (eds) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–54.
36.
MairP (2008) The challenge to party government. West European Politics31: 211–234.
37.
MaleyM (2000) Conceptualising advisers’ policy work: the distinctive policy roles of ministerial advisers in the Keating government, 1991–96. Australian Journal of Political Science35: 449–470.
38.
MazzoleniOVoermanG (2017) Memberless parties: beyond the business-firm party model?Party Politics23: 783–792.
39.
MonroeJ (2001) The Political Party Matrix: The Persistence of Organization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
40.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
ParkeCS (2012) Essential First Steps to Data Analysis: Scenario-Based Examples Using SPSS. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
42.
PeganA (2017) The role of personal parliamentary assistants in the European Parliament. West European Politics40: 295–315.
43.
PittoorsGPattynVVan HeckeS (2017) Who are the political parties’ ideas factories? On policy analysis by political party think tanks. In: Geva-MayIBransMHowlettM (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. Milton Park: Routledge, pp. 245–260.
44.
RomzekBSUtterJA (1997) Congressional legislative staff: political professionals or clerks?American Journal of Political Science41: 1251–1279.
45.
SalisburyRHShepsleKA (1981) Congressional staff turnover and the ties-that-bind. The American Political Science Review75: 381–396.
46.
ScarrowS (1994) The ‘paradox of enrollment’: assessing the costs and benefits of party memberships. European Journal of Political Research25: 41–60.
47.
SellingNSvallforsS (2019) The lure of power: career paths and considerations among policy professionals in Sweden. Politics & Policy47: 984–1012.
48.
SeydPWhiteleyP (2002) New Labour’s Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership. London: Palgrave.
49.
ShawREichbaumC (2018) Ministers, Minders and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
50.
SilvaP (2017) Political advisers in Portugal: partisanship and loyalty in policy processes. Public Administration95: 378–392.
51.
SnagovskyFKerbyM (2018) Political staff and the gendered division of political labour in Canada. Parliamentary Affairs72: 616–637.
52.
StromKMüllerW.BergmanT (2003) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
SvallforsS (2016) Out of the golden cage: PR and the career opportunities of policy professionals. Politics & Policy44: 56–73.
54.
SvallforsS (2017) Knowing the game: motivations and skills among partisan policy professionals. Journal of Professions and Organization4: 55–69.
55.
SvallforsS (2020) Politics for Hire: The World and Work of Policy Professionals. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
56.
TaflagaMKerbyM (2019) Who does what work in a ministerial office: politically appointed staff and the descriptive representation of women in Australian political offices, 1979–2010. Political Studies68: 463–485.
57.
ThomassenJ (1994) Empirical research into political representation: failing democracy or failing models. In: JenningsMKMannTE (eds) Elections at Home and Abroad. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 237–265.
58.
Van BiezenIKopeckýP (2014) The cartel party and the state: party–state linkages in European democracies. Party Politics20: 170–182.
59.
Van BiezenIPoguntkeT (2014) The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics20: 205–216.
60.
van HauteE (2014) Party Membership Figures. Belgium 1945–2012. MAPP Project Data Archive.
61.
WalgraveSCaalsTSuetensM, et al. (2004) Ministerial Cabinets and Partitocracy. A Career Pattern Study of Ministerial Cabinet Members in Belgium. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
62.
WallanderLMolanderA (2014) Disentangling professional discretion: a conceptual and methodological approach. Professions & Professionalism4: 3.
63.
WebbPFisherJ (2003) Professionalism and the Millbank tendency: the political sociology of New Labour’s employees. Politics23: 10–20.
64.
WebbPKeithD (2017) Assessing the strength of party organizational resources: a survey of the evidence from the political party database. In: ScarrowSWebbPPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties. Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–61.
65.
WebbPKolodnyR (2006) Professional staff in political parties. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 337–347.
66.
WebbPBaleTPolettiM (2020) Social networkers and careerists: explaining high-intensity activism among British party members. International Political Science Review41: 255–270.
67.
WeberM (1921) Politics as a Vocation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
68.
WeberR (2020) Why do young people join parties? The influence of individual resources on motivation. Party Politics26: 496–509.
69.
WhiteleyPSeydP (2002) High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
70.
WolfsWDe WinterL (2017) Policy analysis in the legislative branch. In: Geva-MayIBransMHowlettM (eds) Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. Milton Park: Routledge, pp. 199–212.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
