Under which circumstances are women appointed to ministerial positions? In this article, I provide a theoretical framework for the role of gender in ministerial selection by considering the policy, office, and vote-seeking motivations of party leaders. I present an original data set which details, at the party level, the appointment of female cabinet ministers in 30 European countries between 1970 and 2015. Using negative binomial regression models, I find that left-wing party leaders appoint more women than leaders of right-wing parties. Female party leaders appoint more women ministers than their male counterparts. Women are better represented in governments in gender-progressive countries, and survey data analysis shows that party leaders appoint more women when their supporters have more progressive gender attitudes. This analysis provides an original insight into how gender has shaped the partisan dynamics of ministerial selection across Europe over 45 years.
AlexiadouD (2015) Ideologues, partisans, and loyalists: cabinet ministers and social welfare reform in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies48(8): 1051–1086.
2.
AlexiadouD (2016) Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Ministers and Policymaking in Parliamentary Cabinets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BäckHDebusMTosunJ (2015) Partisanship, ministers, and biotechnology policy. Review of Policy Research32(5): 556–575.
8.
BegoI (2014) Accessing power in new democracies: the appointment of female ministers in postcommunist Europe. Political Research Quarterly67(2): 347–360.
9.
BudgeIHans-DieterK (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CareyJM (2007) Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 92–107.
11.
CaulM (1999) Women’s representation in parliament: the role of political parties. Party Politics5(1): 79–98.
12.
CaulM (2001) Political parties and the adoption of candidate gender quotas: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics63(4): 1214–1229.
13.
CelisKChildsS (2014) Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester: ECPR Press.
14.
ChappellL (2006) Comparing political institutions: revealing the gendered ‘logic of appropriateness. Politics and Gender2(2): 223–234.
15.
ChengCTavitsM (2011) Informal influences in selecting female political candidates. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 460–471.
16.
ChildsSKrookML (2008) The substantive representation of women. In ChildsS (ed) Women and British Party Politics: Descriptive, Substantive and Symbolic Representation. New York: Routledge, pp. 108–139.
17.
ChivaC (2005) Women in post-communist politics: explaining underrepresentation in the Hungarian and Romanian parliaments. Europe-Asia Studies57(7): 696–994.
18.
ClaveriaS (2014) Still a “male business”? Explaining women’s presence in executive office. West European Politics37(5): 1156–1176.
19.
CohenPNHuffmanML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. American Sociological Review72(5): 681–704.
DavisR (1997) Women and Power in Parliamentary Democracies: Cabinet Appointments in Western Europe 1968–1992. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
DewanTHortala-VallveR (2011) The three as of government formation: appointment, allocation, and assignment. American Journal of Political Science55(3): 610–627.
23.
DewanTMyattDP (2010) The declining talent pool of government. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 267–286.
24.
De WinterL (1995) The role of parliament in government formation and resignation. In DöringH (ed) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St Martin’s, pp. 115–151.
DowdingKDumontP (2009) The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing. London: Routledge.
27.
Escobar-LemmonMTaylor-RobinsonM (2005) Women ministers in Latin American government: When, where and why?American Journal of Political Science49(4): 829–844.
28.
Escobar-LemmonMTaylor-RobinsonMM (2009) Getting to the top: career paths of women in Latin American Cabinets. Political Research Quarterly62(4): 685–699.
29.
Escobar-LemmonMTaylor-RobinsonM (2016) Women in Presidential Cabinets: Power Players or Abundant Tokens?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FoxRLLawlessJL (2014) Entering the Arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science48(2): 264–280.
32.
GiannettiDLaverM (2005) Policy positions and jobs in the government. European Journal of Political Research44(1): 91–120.
33.
GormanEH (2006) Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: the case of law firm partnership. Social Forces85(2): 865–890.
34.
GrayMMKittilsonMCSandholtzW (2006) Women and globalization: a study of 180 countries, 1975–2000. International Organization60(2): 293–333.
35.
HeppellT (2012) Ministerial selection and the cameron government: Female ministerial representation and the one-third objective. Representation48(2): 209–219. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.683492
HuberJDMartinez-GallardoC (2008) Replacing cabinet ministers: patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review102(2): 169–180.
38.
IndriđasonIKamC (2008) Cabinet reshuffles and ministerial drift. British Journal of Political Science38(4): 621–656.
KamCBiancoWTSenedI, et al. (2010) Ministerial selection and intraparty organization in the contemporary British parliament. American Political Science Review104(2): 289–306.
42.
KanterRM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
43.
KenworthyLMalamiM (1999) Gender inequality in political representation: a worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces78(1): 235–268.
44.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2669316 (accessed 10 March 2016).
45.
KlüverHSagarzazuI (2016) Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics39(2): 380–398.
46.
KlüverHSpoonJJ (2014) Who responds? voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science46: 633–654.
47.
KrookMO’BrienDZ (2012) All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. The Journal of Politics74(3): 840–885.
48.
LaverMShepsleK (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LaverMShepsleKA (1990) Coalitions and government cabinet. American Political Science Review84(3): 873–890.
50.
LiuSJSBanaszakLA (2016) Do government positions held by women matter? A cross-national examination of female ministers’ impacts on women’s political participation. Politics & Gender1–31. Available at: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1743923X16000490 (accessed 18 November 2017).
51.
LovenduskiJNorrisP (1993) Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
52.
ManowPDöeringH (2008) Electoral and mechanical causes of divided government in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies41(10): 1349–1370.
53.
MartinLVanbergG (2005) Coalition policymaking and legislative review. American Political Science Review99(1): 93–106.
54.
MartinLVanbergG (2004) Policing the bargain: coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science48(1): 13–27.
55.
Martinez-GallardoCSchleiterP (2015) Choosing whom to trust: agency risks and cabinet partisanship in presidential democracies. Comparative Political Studies48(2): 231–264.
56.
MatlandR (1998) Women’s representation in national legislatures: developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly23(1): 109–125.
57.
MershonC (2001) Party factions and coalition government: portfolio allocation in Italian Christian Democracy. Electoral Studies20(4): 555–580.
MüllerWC (2000) Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research37(3): 309–333.
60.
MuüllerWCStrømK (1999) Policy, Office, Or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
NorrisP (2004) Electoral Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
NorrisPInglehartR (2001) Women and democracy: cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy12(3): 126–140.
63.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
O’BrienDZMendezMPetersonetJC, et al. (2015) Letting down the ladder or shutting the door: female prime ministers, party leaders, and cabinet ministers. Politics & Gender11(4): 689–717. Available at: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1743923X15000410 (accessed 12 July 2017).
65.
OnoY (2012) Portfolio allocation as leadership strategy: intraparty bargaining in Japan. American Journal of Political Science56(3): 553–567.
66.
PitkinHF (1967) The Concept of Representation. California: University of California Press.
67.
PletzerJLNikolovaRKedzioretKK, et al. (2015) Does gender matter? female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance—A meta-analysis. Plos One10(6): 1–20.
68.
ReynoldsA (1999) Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics51(4): 547–572.
69.
RuleW (1987) Electoral systems, contextual factors and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. The Western Political Quarterly40(3): 477–498.
70.
SiaroffA (2000) Women’s representation in legislatures and cabinets in industrial democracies. International Political Science Review21(2): 197–215.
TomzMWittenbergJKingG (2001) CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Available at: http://gking.harvard.edu (accessed 17 August 2017).
76.
TremblayMPelletierR (2000) More feminists of more women? Descriptive and substantive representation of women in the 1997 Canadian federal elections. International Political Science Review21(4): 381–405.
77.
VandeviverCVan DaeleSVander BekenT (2015) What makes long crime trips worth undertaking? Balancing costs and benefits in burglars’ journey to crime. British Journal of Criminology55(2): 399–420. Available at: http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org.chain.kent.ac.uk/content/55/2/399.full(accessed 14 November 2015).
78.
VolkensA (2007) Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties. Electoral Studies26(1): 108–120.
79.
WilsonHS (1976) The Governance of Britain. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
80.
ZárateROD (2016) Zárate’s political collections, 2016(04/01). Available at: http://zarate.eu/ (accessed 28 May 2016).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
