Parties should develop a consistent issue profile during an electoral campaign. Yet, manifestos, which form the baseline for a party’s programmatic goals in the upcoming legislative period, are usually published months before Election Day. We argue that parties must emphasize policy issues that are of key relevance to their likely voters in the last weeks of the election campaign, in which an increasing share of citizens make up their minds in terms of which party they will choose. To test this notion empirically, we draw on a novel data set that covers information on party representatives’ statements made during the final weeks of an election campaign in nine European countries. Focusing on the campaign messages of social democratic and socialist parties, we find that these parties indeed intensify their emphasis of unemployment policy, which is a salient issue for their core voter clienteles, particularly in times of economic hardship.
Abou-ChadiTHelblingM (2018) How immigration reforms affect voting behavior. Political Studies66(3): 687–717.
2.
AdamsJSomer-TopcuZ (2009) Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science39(4): 825–846.
3.
AnsolabehereSIyengarS (1994) Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues: the joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly58(3): 335–357.
4.
BanducciSGieblerHKritzingerS (2017) Knowing more from less: how the information environment increases knowledge of party positions. British Journal of Political Science47(3): 571–588.
5.
BaumannMGrossM (2016) Where is my party? Introducing new data sets on ideological cohesion and ambiguity of party positions in media coverage. MZES Working Paper 167. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim.
BischofD (2017) New graphic schemes for Stata: plotplain and plotting. The Stata Journal17(3): 749–759.
8.
BräuningerTBrunnerMDäublerT (2012) Personal vote-seeking in flexible list systems: how electoral incentives shape Belgian MPs’ bill initiation behaviour. European Journal of Political Research51(5): 607–645.
9.
BrooksCNieuwbeertaPManzaJ (2006) Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research35(1): 88–128.
10.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Taylor & Francis.
11.
BudgeIKemanH (1990) Parties and Democracies. Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in 20 States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CalcaPGrossM (2019) To adapt or to disregard? Parties’ reactions to external shocks. West European Politics42(3): 545–572.
13.
DassonnevilleRLewis-BeckMS (2014) Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: a national European pool. Acta Politica49(4): 372–394.
14.
DassonnevilleRLewis-BeckMS (2019) A changing economic vote in Western Europe? Long-term vs. short-term forces. European Political Science Review11(1): 91–108.
15.
DassonnevilleRBaudewynsPDebusM, et al. (2017) The time of the vote choice: causes and consequences of late-deciding. In: DeschouwerK (ed) Mind the Gap: Political Participation and Representation in Belgium. Colchester: Rowman & Littlefield International/ECPR Press, pp. 201–227.
16.
De VriesCSolazH (2019) Sweeping it under the rug: how government parties deal with deteriorating economic conditions. Party Politics25(1): 63–75.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
19.
EckerA (2017) Estimating policy positions using social network data: cross-validating position estimates of political parties and individual legislators in the polish parliament. Social Science Computer Review35(1): 53–67.
20.
EvansG (ed) (1999) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
EvansGTilleyJ (2012) The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: explaining the decline of class voting. The Journal of Politics74(4): 963–976.
22.
FarrellDMSchmitt-BeckR (eds) (2003) Do political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge.
23.
FeatherstoneK (2011) The JCMS annual lecture: the Greek sovereign debt crisis and EMU: a failing state in a skewed regime. Journal of Common Market Studies49(2): 193–217.
24.
FossatiD (2014) Economic vulnerability and economic voting in 14 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 116–135.
25.
FournierPNadeauRBlaisA, et al. (2004) Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects. Electoral Studies23(4): 661–681.
26.
GreeneZ (2016) Competing on the issues: how experience in government and economic conditions influence the scope of parties’ policy messages. Party Politics22(6): 809–822.
27.
GreeneZHaberM (2015) The consequences of appearing divided: an analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies37(1): 15–27.
28.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The growing importance of issue competition: the changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55(3): 607–628.
29.
Green-PedersenCJensenC (2019) Electoral competition and the welfare state. West European Politics42(4): 803–823.
30.
HaselmayerMMeyerTMWagnerM (2019) Fighting for attention: media coverage of negative campaign messages. Party Politics25(3): 412–423.
31.
HaselmayerMWagnerMMeyerTM (2017) Partisan bias in message selection: media gatekeeping of party press releases. Political Communication34(3): 367–384.
32.
HaughtonT (2014) Money, margins and the motors of politics: the EU and the development of party politics in central and Eastern Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies52(1): 71–87.
33.
HeathO (2015) Policy representation, social representation and class voting in Britain. British Journal of Political Science45(1): 173–193.
34.
HeathO (2018) Policy alienation, social alienation and working-class abstention in Britain, 1964-2010. British Journal of Political Science48(4): 1053–1073.
35.
HellwigT (2012) Constructing accountability party position taking and economic voting. Comparative Political Studies45(1): 91–118.
36.
HoboltSBde VriesCE (2015) Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies48(9): 1159–1185.
37.
HornAKevinsAJensenC, et al. (2017) Peeping at the corpus – What is really going on behind the equality and welfare items of the Manifesto project?Journal of European Social Policy27(5): 403–416.
38.
KimISLondreganJRatkovicM (2018) Estimating spatial preferences from votes and text. Political Analysis26(2): 210–229.
39.
KlüverHSagarzazuI (2016) Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics39(2): 380–398.
40.
KlüverHSpoonJ (2016) Who Responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science46(3): 633–654.
41.
LachatR (2007) A Heterogeneous Electorate: Political Sophistication, Predisposition Strength, and the Voting Decision Process. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
42.
LeDucLPammettJH (2013) The fate of governing parties in times of economic crisis. Electoral Studies32(3): 494–499.
43.
Lewis-BeckMSNadeauR (2009) Obama and the economy in 2008. PS: Political Science & Politics42(3): 479–483.
44.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 183–219.
45.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2013) The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice157(3-4): 367–385.
46.
Lewis-BeckMSJacobyWGNorpothH, et al. (2008) The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
LoweWBenoitKMikhaylovS, et al. (2011) Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly36(1): 123–155.
48.
MairPMuddeC (1998) The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science1(1): 211–229.
49.
MairPMüllerWCPlasserF (eds) (2004) Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets. London: Sage.
50.
MeguidB (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
51.
MeyerTWagnerM (2016) Issue engagement in election campaigns: the impact of electoral incentives and organizational constraints. Political Science Research and Methods4(3): 555–571.
52.
MeyerTWagnerM (2020) Perceptions of parties’ left-right positions: the impact of salience strategies. Party Politics26(5): 664–674.
53.
MutzDC (2002) The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science46(4): 838–855.
54.
NadeauRPétryFBélangerÉ (2010) Issue-based strategies in election campaigns: the case of health care in the 2000 Canadian federal election. Political Communication27(4): 367–388.
55.
PapkeLEWooldridgeJM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics145(1): 121–133.
56.
Pardos-PradoSSagarzazuI (2016) The political conditioning of subjective economic evaluations: the role of party discourse. British Journal of Political Science46(4): 799–832.
57.
Pardos-PradoSSagarzazuI (2019) Economic performance and center-periphery conflicts in party competition. Party Politics25(1): 50–62.
58.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850.
59.
PowellGBWhittenGD (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
60.
ProkschS-OLoweWWäckerleJ, et al. (2019) Multilingual sentiment analysis: a new approach to measuring conflict in legislative speeches. Legislative Studies Quarterly44(1): 97–131.
61.
ReherS (2014) The effect of congruence in policy priorities on electoral participation. Electoral Studies36: 158–172.
62.
RikerWH (1993) Rhetorical interaction in the ratification campaigns. In: RikerWH (ed) Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 81–123.
63.
RovnyJWhitefieldS (2019) Issue dimensionality and party competition in turbulent times. Party Politics25(1): 4–11.
64.
Schmitt-BeckRPartheymüllerJ (2012) Why voters decide late: a simultaneous test of old and new hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German federal elections. German Politics21(3): 299–316.
65.
SchröderVSteckerC (2018) The temporal dimension of issue competition. Party Politics26(6): 708–718.
66.
SchuckARXezonakisGElenbaasM, et al. (2011) Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections. Electoral Studies30(1): 41–52.
67.
SeebergHB (2017a) How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies65(2): 475–492.
68.
SeebergHB (2017b) What can a government do? Government issue ownership and real-world problems. European Journal of Political Research56(2): 346–363.
69.
SeebergHBSlothuusRStubagerR (2017) Do voters learn? Evidence that voters respond accurately to changes in political parties’ policy positions. West European Politics40(2): 336–356.
70.
SingerMM (2013) The global economic crisis and domestic political agendas. Electoral Studies32(3): 404–410.
71.
Somer-TopcuZ (2015) Everything to everyone: the electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science59(4): 841–854.
72.
Somer-TopcuZZarME (2014) European parliamentary elections and national party policy change. Comparative Political Studies47(6): 878–902.
73.
SpoonJJHoboltSBde VriesCE (2014) Going green: explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research53(2): 363–380.
74.
SteckerCTausendpfundM (2016) Multidimensional government- citizen congruence and satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research55(3): 492–511.
75.
StokesDE (1963) Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review57(2): 368–377.
76.
StrømKMüllerWC (1999) Political parties and hard choices. In: MüllerWCStrømK (eds) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.
77.
StubagerRSlothuusR (2013) What are the sources of political parties’ issue ownership? Testing four explanations at the individual level. Political Behavior35(3): 567–588.
78.
TavitsMPotterJD (2015) The effect of inequality and social identity on party strategies. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 744–758.
79.
ThesenG (2013) When good news is scarce and bad news is good: government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research52(3): 364–389.
80.
TraberDGigerNHäusermannS (2018) How economic crises affect political representation: declining party-voter congruence in times of constrained government. West European Politics41(5): 1100–1124.
81.
van der WaalJAchterbergPHoutmanD (2007) Class is not dead—it has been buried alive: class voting and cultural voting in postwar western societies (1956–1990). Politics & Society35(3): 403–426.
82.
VavreckL (2009) The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
83.
VolkensABaraJBudgeI, et al. (2013) Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
WagnerMMeyerTM (2014) Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics37(5): 1019–1045.
85.
WilliamsLKSekiKWhittenGD (2016) You’ve got some explaining to do. The influence of economic conditions and spatial competition on party strategy. Political Science Research and Methods4(1): 47–63.
86.
WilliamsR (2017) Analyzing proportions: Fractional response and zero one inflated beta models. Working paper University of Notre Dame. Paris: University of Notre Dame. Available at: https://www3.nd.edu/∼rwilliam/stats3/FractionalResponseModels.pdf(accessed 13 October 2018).
87.
ZingherJNFarrerB (2016) The electoral effects of the descriptive representation of ethnic minority groups in Australia and the UK. Party Politics22(6): 691–704.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
