It is a well-established empirical finding that governments on average lose votes during their time in office. This exploratory analysis examines whether all members of coalition governments suffer the electoral cost of governing equally. Using electoral data from 20 parliamentary systems from 1961 to 2015, I compare the electoral performance of junior coalition members, the prime minister of a coalition, and single-party governments. Furthermore, I examine the conditioning effects of economic performance, legislative institutions as well as party ideology and size. I find that there are substantial differences in the electoral cost of governing for different types of coalition participation. The evidence suggests that the prime minister in a coalition is partially insulated from the penalties of government and thus should try to attract junior coalition members whenever possible.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL, et al. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 513–529.
2.
AdamsJEzrowLWlezienC (2016) The company you keep: how voters infer party positions on European integration from governing coalition arrangements. American Journal of Political Science60(4): 811–823.
3.
AkkermanTLangeSL (2012) Radical right parties in office: incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing. Government and Opposition47(4): 574–596.
4.
BakkerRDe VriesCEdwardsE, et al. (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
5.
BenoitKLaverM (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
6.
CastlesFGMairP (1984) Left-right political scales: some ‘expert’ judgments. European Journal of Political Research12(1): 73–88.
7.
DassonnevilleRLewis-BeckMS (2014) Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: a national European pool. Acta Politica49(4): 372–394.
8.
DassonnevilleRLewis-BeckMS (2017) Rules, institutions and the economic vote: clarifying clarity of responsibility. West European Politics40(3): 534–559.
9.
DebusMStegmaierMTosunJ (2014) Economic voting under coalition governments: evidence from Germany. Political Science Research and Methods2(1): 49–67.
10.
DommettK (2013) A miserable little compromise? Exploring liberal democrat fortunes in the UK coalition. The Political Quarterly84(2): 218–227.
11.
DöringHManowP (2016) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): information on parties, elections, and cabinets in modern democracies. Available at: http://www.parlgov.org (accessed 14 July 2018).
12.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
13.
DuchRStevensonR (2013) Voter perceptions of agenda power and attribution of responsibility for economic performance. Electoral Studies32(3): 512–516.
14.
DuchRPrzepiorkaWStevensonR (2015) Responsibility attribution for collective decision makers. American Journal of Political Science59(2): 372–389.
15.
DuchRMStevensonRT (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FortunatoD (2019) The electoral implications of coalition policy making. British Journal of Political Science49(1): 59–80.
17.
FortunatoDAdamsJ (2015) How voters’ perceptions of junior coalition partners depend on the prime minister’s position. European Journal of Political Research54(3): 601–621.
18.
FortunatoDStevensonRT (2013) Perceptions of partisan ideologies: the effect of coalition participation. American Journal of Political Science57(2): 459–477.
19.
GarritzmannJL (2017) How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the opportunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies23(1): 1–30.
20.
HoboltSTilleyJBanducciS (2013) Clarity of responsibility: how government cohesion conditions performance voting. European Journal of Political Research52(2): 164–187.
21.
HuberJInglehartR (1995) Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies. Party Politics1(1): 73–111.
22.
MartinLWVanbergG (2004) Policing the bargain: coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science48(1): 13–27.
23.
MuellerJE (1970) Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review64(01): 18–34.
24.
NadeauRLewis-BeckMSBélangerE (2013) Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies46(5): 551–573.
25.
NannestadPPaldamM (2002) The cost of ruling: a foundation stone for two theories. In: DorussenHTaylorM (eds), Economic Voting, chapter 2. Didcot: Taylor & Francis, pp. 17–44.
26.
PaldamM (1986) The distribution of election results and the two explanations of the cost of ruling. European Journal of Political Economy2(1): 5–24.
27.
PaldamMSkottP (1995) A rational-voter explanation of the cost of ruling. Public Choice83(1–2): 159–172.
28.
PowellGBWhittenGD (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
29.
RaeD (1968) A note on the fractionalization of some European party systems. Comparative Political Studies1(3): 413.
30.
RoseRMackieTT (1983) Incumbency in government: asset or liability? In: DaalderHMairP (eds), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, chapter 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 115–138.
31.
RüdigW (2006) Is government good for greens? Comparing the electoral effects of government participation in Western and East-Central Europe. European Journal of Political Research45(s1): S127–S154.
32.
SchofieldNLaverM (1990) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
StevensonRT (2002) The cost of ruling, cabinet duration, and the median-gap model. Public Choice113(1–2): 157–178.
34.
StrømK (1985) Party goals and government performance in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review79(3): 738–754.
35.
StrømK (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Van der BrugWVan der EijkCFranklinM (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Van SpanjeJ (2011) Keeping the rascals in: anti-political-establishment parties and their cost of governing in established democracies. European Journal of Political Research50(5): 609–635.
38.
WhittenGDPalmerHD (1999) Cross-national analyses of economic voting. Electoral Studies18(1): 49–67.
