We propose a new three-dimensional approach to party newness and an interval index of party congruence/novelty. Building on this, we also propose a split-vote-by-congruence (SBC) approach to electoral volatility that employs the index. Four elections from different countries that exhibited different forms of party change are used to illustrate the approach. The congruence/novelty index corresponds to our qualitative case knowledge, and the SBC approach leads to meaningful volatility scores. Ad hoc coding of parties as new/old or singular successors/predecessors can seriously over- or underestimate volatility that explains divergence among volatility scores in literature. By eliminating the need for dichotomous and often controversial coding decisions, the SBC approach allows for a substantially more reliable calculation of volatility.
BarneaSRahatG (2011) Out with the old, in with the ‘new’: what constitutes a new party?Party Politics17(3): 303–320.
2.
BartoliniSMairP (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BielasiakJ (2002) The institutionalization of electoral and party systems in postcommunist states. Comparative Politics34(2): 189–210.
4.
BirchS (2003) Electoral System and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
5.
Casal BértoaFDeegan-KrauseKHaughtonT (2015) Splitting the difference: measuring institutional and electoral volatility. In: Paper presented at the Workshop on Party System Stability and Electoral Volatility: Its Measurement and Implications, Nottingham, UK, 26–27 February 2015.
6.
ChiaramonteAEmanueleV (2017) Party system volatility, regeneration and de-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015). Party Politics23(4): 376–388.
7.
DassonnevilleRHoogheM (2017) Economic indicators and electoral volatility: economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics15(6): 919–943.
8.
De LangeSLGuerraS (2009) The league of polish families between east and west, past and present. Communist and Post-Communist Studies42(4): 527–549.
9.
DiskinAHazanRY (2007) The Knesset election in Israel, March 2006. Electoral Studies26(3): 707–711.
10.
DrummondAJ (2006) Electoral volatility and party decline in Western Democracies: 1970–1995. Political Studies54(3): 628–647.
11.
EmanueleVChiaramonteA (2018) A growing impact of new parties: Myth or reality? Party system innovation in Western Europe after 1945. Party Politics24(5): 475–487.
12.
ElklitJ (2005) Denmark: simplicity embedded in complexity (or is it the other way round). In GallagherMMitchellP (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 453–471.
13.
ErssonS (2012) Electoral volatility in Europe: assessments and potential explanations for estimate differences. Paper presented at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) Conference, Oxford, UK.
Indenrigsministeriet (1999) Folketingsvalget den 11. marts 1998. Copenhagen.
16.
GherghinaS (2015) Party organization and electoral volatility in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
17.
HanleySSikkA (2016) Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics. 22(4): 522–533.
18.
HarmelR (1985) On the study of new parties. International Political Science Review6(4): 403–418.
19.
HarmelRRobertsonJD (1985) Formation and success of new parties: a cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review6(4): 501–523
20.
HugS (2001) Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
IbenskasRSikkA (2017). Patterns of party change in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990–2015. Party Politics23(1): 43–54.
22.
KeyVO (1942) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas B. Crowell Company.
KreuzerMPettaiV (2003) Patterns of political instability: affiliation patterns of politicians and voters in post-communist Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Studies in Comparative International Development38(2): 76–98.
25.
LagoIMartínezF (2011) Why new parties?Party Politics17(1): 3–20.
26.
LaneJEErssonS (2007) Party system instability in Europe: persistent differences in volatility between West and East?Democratization14(1): 92–110.
27.
LittonK (2015) Party novelty: conceptualization and measurement of party change. Party Politics21(5): 712–725.
28.
LucardieP (2000) Prophets, purifiers and prolocutors: towards a theory on the emergence of new parties. Party Politics6(2): 175–185.
29.
MainwaringSCocoE (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition electoral volatility in old and new Democracies. Party Politics13(2): 155–178.
30.
MainwaringSEspañaAGervasoniC (2009) Extra system electoral volatility and the vote share of young parties. In: Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Conference, Toronto, Canada, 28 May 2009, http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2009/Mainwaring.pdf
31.
MairP (1993) Myths of electoral change and the survival of traditional parties. European Journal of Political Research24(2): 121–133.
32.
MarinovaDM (2015) A new approach to estimating electoral instability in parties. Political Science Research and Methods3(2): 265–280.
MillardF (2003a) The parliamentary elections in Poland, September 2001. Electoral Studies22(2): 367–74.
35.
MillardF (2003b) Elections in Poland 2001: electoral manipulation and party upheaval. Communist and Post-Communist Studies36(1): 69–86.
36.
NielsenHJ (1999) The Danish election 1998. Scandinavian Political Studies22(1): 67–81.
37.
NúñezLSimónPPiletJB (2017) Electoral volatility and the dynamics of electoral reform. West European Politics40(2): 378–401.
38.
PedersenK (2006) Driving a populist party: The Danish People’s Party. Working Paper, Institut for Statskundskab, Copenhagen University.
39.
PedersenMN (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
40.
PedersenMN (1980) On measuring party system change a methodological critique and a suggestion. Comparative Political Studies12(4): 387–403.
41.
PettaiV (2004) Estonia. European Journal of Political Research43(7–8): 993–999.
42.
PettaiV (2008) Estonia. European Journal of Political Research47(7–8): 962–968.
43.
PowellENTuckerJ (2014) Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: new data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 123–147.
44.
Polish News Bulletin (2001) League of Polish Families Forges new ground on right. 28 September 2001. Available via Nexis UK (accessed 7 March 2017).
45.
PopescuMHannavyM (2001) Project on political transformation and the electoral process in post-communist Europe. University of Essex. Available at: http://www.essex.ac.uk/elections (accessed 7 June 2017).
46.
RattingerH (1997) Nomination: To Swing or Not to Swing. European Journal of Political Research31: 86–93.
47.
RobertsKMWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: a test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. The American Political Science Review93(3): 575–590.
48.
ShabadGSlomczynskiKM (2004) Inter-party mobility among parliamentary candidates in post-communist East Central Europe. Party Politics10(2): 151–176.
49.
SikkA (2005) How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research44(3): 391–412.
50.
SikkA (2012) Newness as a winning formula for new political parties. Party Politics18(4): 465–486.
51.
SzczerbiakA (1998) Electoral politics in Poland: the parliamentary elections of 1997. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics14(3): 58–83.
52.
SzczerbiakA (2002) Poland’s unexpected political earthquake: the September 2001 parliamentary election. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics18(3): 41–76.
53.
TavitsM (2005) The development of stable party support: electoral dynamics in post-communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science49(2): 283–298.
54.
TavitsM (2006) Party system change. Testing a model of new party entry. Party Politics12 (1): 99–119.
55.
TavitsM (2008a) On the linkage between electoral volatility and party system instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research47(5): 537–555.
56.
TavitsM (2008b) Party systems in the making: the emergence and success of new parties in New Democracies. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 113–133.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
