The economic crisis within the European Union has had a significant impact on domestic politics in the member states, affecting the links between parties and citizens and accentuating the tensions parties face between governing responsibility and being responsive to public opinion. This article examines whether parties in EU countries have shifted their left–right ideological positions during the current crisis and whether such shifts are a direct response to the pressures of wider economic conditions or are more affected by changes in the preferences of the median voter. Party-based and citizen-based data are examined between 2002 and 2015, encompassing both the precrisis and crisis periods. The main findings are that the economic crisis has made parties less responsive to public opinion on the left–right dimension, and this effect is more pronounced for parties that have been in government.
AdamsJ (2012) Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science15(1): 401–419.
2.
AdamsJSomer-TopcuZ (2009) Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science39(4): 825–846.
3.
AdamsJHauptABStollH (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies42(5): 611–639.
4.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL. (2004) understanding change and stability in party ideologies: do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science34(4): 589–610.
5.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014) The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: the role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
6.
BardiLBartoliniBTrechselAH (2014) Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics37(2): 235–252.
7.
BeckNKatzJN (2011) Modeling dynamics in time-series–cross-section political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science14: 331–352.
8.
BelchiorAMTsatsanisEPequito TeixeiraC (2016) Representation in times of crisis: deputy–voter congruence on views of representation in Portugal. International Political Science Review37(2): 277–293.
9.
BenoitKMikhaylovSLaverM (2009). Treating words as data with error: uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science53(2): 495–513.
10.
BraunDTausendpfundM (2014) The impact of the euro crisis on citizens’ support for the European Union. Journal of European Integration36(3): 231–245.
11.
BremerB (2018) The Missing Left? The programmatic response of social democratic parties to the Great Recession. Party Politics24(1): 23–38.
BudgeIMcDonaldM (2007). Election and party system effects on policy representation: bringing time into comparative perspective. Electoral Studies26(1): 168–179.
14.
BudgeIKlingemannHDVolkensA. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
DäublerT (2012) The preparation and use of election manifestos. Irish Political Studies27(1): 51–70.
16.
DolezalMEnnser-JedenastikLMüllerWC. (2012) The life cycle of party manifestos: the Austrian case. West European Politics35(4): 869–895.
17.
DorussenHNanouK (2006) European integration, intergovernmental bargaining, and convergence of party programmes. European Union Politics7(2): 235–256.
18.
EriksonRSMackuenMBStimsonJA (2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
ESS Round 7: European Social Survey Round 7 Data (2014). Data file edition 2.1. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
20.
ESS Round 6: European Social Survey Round 6 Data (2012). Data file edition 2.3. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
21.
ESS Round 5: European Social Survey Round 5 Data (2010). Data file edition 3.3. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
22.
ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data (2008). Data file edition 4.4. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
23.
ESS Round 3: European Social Survey Round 3 Data (2006). Data file edition 3.6. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
24.
ESS Round 2: European Social Survey Round 2 Data (2004). Data file edition 3.5. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
25.
ESS Round 1: European Social Survey Round 1 Data (2002). Data file edition 6.5. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
26.
EzrowL (2007). The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics69(1): 182–192.
27.
EzrowLHellwigT (2014) Responding to voters or responding to markets? Political parties and public opinion in an era of globalization. International Studies Quarterly58(4): 816–827.
28.
EzrowLDe VriesCSteenbergenM. (2011) Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?Party Politics17(3): 275–301.
29.
FagerholmA (2016) Why do political parties change their policy positions?A Review Political Studies Review14(4): 501–511.
30.
FreireALisiMAndreadisI. (2014) Political representation in Bailed-out Southern Europe: Greece and Portugal compared. South European Society and Politics19(4): 413–433.
31.
GemenisKNeziR (2015) Government-opposition dynamics during the economic crisis in Greece. Journal of Legislative Studies21(1): 14–34.
32.
GigerNHäusermannSTraberD (2016) How economic crisis affects political representation: declining party-voter congruence in times of austerity. In: Prepared for presentation at the 22nd International Conference of Europeanists, Philadelphia, 14–16 April 2016, pp. 1–32.
33.
HauptAB (2010) Parties responses to economic globalization. What is left for the left and right for the right?Party Politics16(1): 5–27.
34.
HixS (2003) The End of Democracy in Europe? How the European Union (as Currently Designed) Restricts Political Competition. London: Typescript, London School of Economics.
35.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics39(5): 971–991.
36.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009) World Economic Outlook April 2009: Crisis and Recovery. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
37.
KaryotisGRüdigWJudgeD (2014) Representation and austerity politics: attitudes of Greek voters and elites compared. South European Society and Politics14(4): 435–456.
38.
KatsanidouAOtjesS (2016) How the European debt crisis reshaped national political space: the case of Greece. European Union Politics17(2): 242–262.
39.
KlingemannHDVolkensABaraJ. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
KraftJ (2017) Social democratic austerity: the conditional role of agenda dynamics and issue ownership. Journal of European Public Policy24(10): 1430–1449.
41.
KriesiH (2014) The political consequences of the economic crises in Europe: Electoral punishment and popular protest. In: BermeoNBartelsLM (eds), Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–333.
42.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) Effective number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
43.
LaverMJBudgeI (1992) Party Policy and Government Coalitions. Basingstoke (Houndmills): Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
MairP (2013) Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
45.
MairP (2009) Representative versus Responsible Government. MPIfG Working Paper 09/8. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Available at: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp09-8.pdf (accessed 02 January 2017)
46.
MairP (2000) The limited impact of Europe on national party systems. West European Politics23(4): 27–51.
47.
MikhaylovSLaverMBenoitKR (2012) Coder reliability and misclassification in the human coding of party manifestos. Political Analysis20(1): 78–91.
48.
NanouKDorussenH (2013) European integration and electoral democracy: how the European Union constrains party competition in the Member States. European Journal of Political Research52(1): 71–93.
49.
PlümperTTroegerVEManowP (2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 327–354.
50.
RoseR (2014) Responsible party government in a World of Interdependence. West European Politics37(2): 253–269.
51.
RothFJonungLNowak-LehmannDF (2016) Crisis and public support for the Euro, 1990–2014. European Journal of Political Research54(4): 944–960.
52.
SekiK.WilliamsLK (2014) Updating the party government data set. Electoral Studies34(2): 270–279.
53.
SerricchioFTsakatikaMQuagliaL (2013) Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies51(1): 51–64.
54.
SoltJ (2016) The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly97(5): 1267–1281.
55.
SteinerNDMartinCW (2012) Economic integration, party polarisation and electoral turnout. West European Politics35(2): 238–265.
56.
StimsonJMacKuenMEriksonR (1995) Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89(3): 543–565.
57.
TillmanE. (2016) The supply side of electoral politics: how globalization matters for party strategies. In: VowlesJXezonakisG (eds), Globalization and Domestic Politics: Parties, Elections, and Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–51.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT. (2016) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
60.
WardHEzrowLDorussenH (2011) Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics63(3): 509–547.
61.
WardDKimJHGrahamM. (2015) How economic integration affects party issue emphases. Comparative Political Studies48(10): 1227–1259.
62.
WooldridgeJM (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Mason (Ohio): South Western-Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
