Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-3
Responding to growing European Union-skepticism? The stances of political parties toward European integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the financial crisis
Using data from two expert surveys conducted in 2007–2008 and 2013 in 24 European democracies, we examine the response of political parties—especially mainstream ones—across the European Union to the growth in public European Union-skepticism since the onset of the financial crisis. Theoretically, we point to competing spatial and reputational pressures on mainstream and extreme parties to adjust their integration positions. We find that mainstream parties respond fairly little over time and that this has left a representational opening for extreme parties, which is especially filled by new European Union-skeptic parties.
ArnoldCFranklinMN (2012) Introduction: Issue congruence and political responsiveness. West European Politics35(6): 1217–1225.
2.
ArterD (2013) The ‘Hows’, not the ‘Whys’ or the ‘Wherefores’: The role of intra-party competition in the 2011 breakthrough of the true finns. Scandinavian Political Studies36(2): 99–120.
3.
BudgeI (1994) A new spatial theory of party competition: Uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science24(4): 443–467.
4.
DaltonRJFarrellDMMcAllisterI (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
de VriesCE (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?: How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8(3): 363–385.
6.
de VriesCE (2013) Ambivalent Europeans? Public support for European integration in east and west. Government and Opposition48(3): 434–461.
7.
de VriesCEEdwardsEE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
8.
de VriesCEHoboltSB (2012) When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics13(2): 246–268.
9.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
10.
FranklinMMarshM (1994) Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies32(4): 455.
11.
Gómez-ReinoMLlamazaresI (2013) The populist radical right and European integration: A comparative analysis of party–voter links. West European Politics36(4): 789–816.
12.
HoboltSBBrouardS (2011) Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French rejected the European constitution. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 309–322.
13.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2014) Blaming Europe? Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HoffmanL (2015) Longitudinal Analysis. Modeling Within-Person Fluctuation and Change, New York: Routledge.
15.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonC (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
16.
HoogheLMarksG (2008) A postfunctionlist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
17.
KopeckyPMuddeC (2002) The two sides of Euroskepticism: Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics3(3): 297–326.
18.
KriesiH (2007) The role of European integration in national election campaigns. European Union Politics8(1): 83–108.
19.
LynchPWhitakerRLoomesG (2012) The UK independence party: Understanding a niche party’s strategy, candidates and supporters. Parliamentary Affairs65(4): 733–757.
20.
MattilaMRaunioT (2012) Drifting further apart: National parties and their electorates on the EU dimension. West European Politics35(3): 589–606.
21.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party competition in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 327–346.
22.
MeyerTMWagnerM (2013) Mainstream or niche? Vote-seeking incentives and the programmatic strategies of political parties. Comparative Political Studies46(10): 1246–1272.
23.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850.
24.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2006) Political parties, public opinion and european integration in post-communist countries: The state of the art. European Union Politics7(1): 141–160.
25.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2012) The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Roth F, Nowak-Lehmann F and Otter T (2013) Crisis and Trust in National and European Union Institutions—Panel Evidence for the EU, 1999–2012. RSCAS Working Papers. Florence: European University Institute. Available at: http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/26975 (accessed 9 September 2015).
27.
RovnyJ (2012) Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition. European Union Politics13(2): 269–292.
28.
SchmittH (2005) The European parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order?West European Politics28(3): 650–679.
29.
SchumacherGde VriesCEVisB (2013) Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. The Journal of Politics75(2): 464–477.
30.
SerricchioFTsakatikaMQuagliaL (2013) Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies51(1): 51–64.
31.
TaggartP (1998) A touchstone of dissent: Euroskepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Science33(3): 363–388.
32.
TavitsM (2008) Policy positions, issue importance, and party competition in new democracies. Comparative Political Studies41(1): 48–72.
33.
ThomassenJ (2012) The blind corner of political representation. Representation48(1): 13–27.
34.
van KesselS (2013) A matter of supply and demand: The electoral performance of populist parties in three European countries. Government and Opposition48(2): 175–199.
35.
WhitefieldS (2002) Political cleavages and post-communist politics. Annual Review of Politics5(1): 181–200.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
