During the last decades, the immigration phenomenon has gained increasing relevance in the European political space. This article examines to what extent the responsiveness of mainstream parties to the public opinion on immigration and to the objective migration context is affected by the party system configuration. The empirical analysis relies on data from the Comparative Manifesto Project, the European Social Survey, ParlGov database and OECD annual indicators on migration inflows, covering 17 European countries over the period 2003–2013. Based on cross-classified multilevel models, the results suggest that the presence of strong radical right parties enhances the responsiveness of mainstream parties to public preferences and the migration context.
Abou-ChadiT (2016) Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts – how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science46(2): 417–436.
2.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 513–529.
3.
AdamsJHauptABStollH (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies42(5): 611–639.
4.
AlonsoSda FonsecaSC (2012) Immigration, left and right. Party Politics18(6): 865–884.
5.
ArnoldCFranklinMN (2012) Introduction: issue congruence and political responsiveness. West European Politics35(6): 1217–1225.
6.
ArnoldCSapirEVDe VriesC (2012) Parties’ positions on European integration: issue congruence, ideology or context?West European Politics35(6): 1341–1362.
7.
ArzheimerKCarterE (2006) Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research45: 419–443.
8.
BaleT (2003) Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems. West European Politics26(3): 67–90.
9.
BaleTGreen-PedersenCKrouwelA. (2010) If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies58(3): 410–426.
BursteinP (2003) The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly56(1): 29–40.
12.
CeobanuAMEscandellX (2010) Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: a review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology36: 309–328.
13.
CostelloRThomassenJRosemaM (2012) European Parliament elections and political representation: policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics35(6): 1226–1248.
14.
DahlströmCSundellA (2012) A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success. Electoral Studies31(2): 353–363.
15.
DaltonRJFarrellDMMcAllisterI (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
DöringHManowP (2015) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Stable version 2015 - 12 March 2016. Available at: http://www.parlgov.org.
17.
EriksonRSMacKuenMBStimsonJA (2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
European Social Survey Cumulative File, ESS 1–6 (2014) Data file edition 1.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway - Data Archive and distributor of ESS data. Available athttp://www.europeansocialsurvey.org.
19.
EzrowLHellwigT (2014) Responding to voters or responding to markets? Political parties and public opinion in an era of globalization. International Studies Quarterly58: 816–827.
20.
EzrowLDe VriesCSteenbergenM. (2011) Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?Party Politics17(3): 275–301.
21.
GolderM (2016) Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science19: 477–497.
22.
HagemannSHoboltSBWratilC (2017) Government responsiveness in the European Union: evidence from Council voting. Comparative Political Studies50(6): 850–876.
23.
HanKJ (2015) The impact of radical right-wing parties on the positions of mainstream parties regarding multiculturalism. West European Politics38(3): 557–576.
24.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies41(1): 3–23.
25.
KlingemannHDVolkensABaraJL. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
27.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
28.
MillerWEStokesDE (1963) Constituency influence in congress. The American Political Science Review57(1): 45–56.
29.
MuddeC (1999) The single-issue party thesis: extreme right parties and the immigration issue. West European Politics22(3): 182–197.
30.
PageBIShapiroRY (1983) Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review77(1): 175–190.
31.
Pardos-PradoSLanceeBSagarzazuI (2014) Immigration and electoral change in mainstream political space. Political Behavior36(4): 847–875.
32.
PowellGB (2004) Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science7: 273–296.
33.
Rabe-HeskethSSkrondalA (2012) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling using Stata. Volume I: Continuous Responses, 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
34.
RossetJGigerNBernauerJ (2017) I the people? Self-interest and demand for government responsiveness. Comparative Political Studies50(6): 794–821.
35.
Rovira KaltwasserC (2012) The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization19(2): 184–208.
36.
RydgrenJ (2008) Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries. European Journal of Political Research47(6): 737–765.
37.
SchainMA (2006) The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: measuring direct and indirect effects. West European Politics29(2): 270–289.
38.
SchumacherGvan KersbergenK (2016) Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?Party Politics22(3): 300–312.
39.
SidesJCitrinJ (2007) European opinion about immigration: the role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science37(3): 477–504.
40.
SorokaSNWlezienC (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SpoonJKlüverH (2015) Voter polarisation and party responsiveness: Why parties emphasise divided issues, but remain silent on unified issues. European Journal of Political Research54: 343–362.
42.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEde VriesCE (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
43.
Van Der BrugWVan SpanjeJ (2009) Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research48(3): 309–334.
44.
Van Der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2005) Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: a two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies38(5): 537–573.
45.
van SpanjeJ (2010) Contagious parties: anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics16(5): 563–586.
46.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT. (2016a) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/ CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
47.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT. (2016b) The Manifesto Project Dataset - Codebook. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
48.
WertsHScheepersPLubbersM (2013) Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics14(2): 183–205.
49.
WilliamsCSpoonJJ (2015) Differentiated party response: the effect of Euroskeptic public opinion on party positions. European Union Politics16(2): 176–193.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
