Political scientists have identified protest voting – voting for an anti-establishment party as a protest against mainstream politics – as a consequence of dissatisfaction with traditional political options. Yet we know little about what motivates people to cast a protest vote or why voters select one such protest option over another. Taking as its empirical referent the 2015 General Election in Great Britain, this article assesses the ‘protest choice’ in parliamentary democracies. We test three possible theoretical explanations for protest voting: ideology, mistrust of political elites and campaign effects. We find that the most important factors affecting protest choice are issue positions and campaign effects. The findings suggest that protest voting is a complex phenomenon that cannot be reduced to knee-jerk anti-politics reactions.
AbediALundbergTC (2009) Doomed to failure? UKIP and the organisational challenges facing right-wing populist anti-political establishment parties. Parliamentary Affairs62(1): 72–87.
2.
AllenNBirchS (2015) Ethics and Integrity in British Politics: How Citizens Judge Their Politicians’ Conduct and Why It Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BartelsLM. (2014) Ideology and retrospection in electoral responses to the Great Recession. In: BermeoNBartelsLM (eds) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–223.
4.
BélangerE (2004) Antipartyism and third party vote choice: a comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia. Comparative Political Studies37(9): 1054–1078.
5.
BélangerENadeauR (2005) Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections: The Canadian case. European Journal of Political Research44(1): 121–146.
6.
BélangerEAartsK (2006) Explaining the rise of the LPF: issues, discontent, and the 2002 Dutch election. Acta Politica41(1): 4–20.
7.
BellucciP (2014) The political consequences of blame attribution for the economic crisis in the 2013 Italian national election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24(2): 243–263.
8.
BerghJ (2004) Protest voting in Austria, Denmark, and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies27(4): 367–389.
9.
BetzHG (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
10.
BirchS (2009) Real progress: prospects for Green party support in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs62(1): 53–71.
11.
BombergE (1998) Green Parties and Politics in the European Union. New York and London: Routledge.
12.
BowlerSLanoueDJ (1992) Strategic and protest voting for third parties: the case of the Canadian NDP. Western Political Quarterly45(2): 485–499.
13.
BrennanGLomaskyL (1993) Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BrusisM (2016) Democracies adrift: how the European crises affect East-Central Europe. Problems of Postcommunism63(5–6): 263–276. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2016.1201772.
15.
CarterNRootesC (2006) The environment and the Greens in the 2005 elections in Britain. Environmental Politics15(3): 473–478.
16.
CoanTGMerollaJLStephensonLB. (2008) It’s not easy being Green: minor party labels as heuristic aids. Political Psychology29(3): 389–405.
17.
CracknellR (2010) General Election 2010 Preliminary analysis’ House of Commons Library Research Paper 10/36. London: House of Commons Library.
18.
DaltonRJ (1996) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Western Democracies, 2nd ed. Chatham: Chatham House.
19.
DaltonRJ (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
DennisonJ (2015) The other insurgency? The Greens and the election. Parliamentary Affairs68(1): 188–205.
21.
DennisonJ (2017) The Greens in British Politics: Protest, Anti-Austerity and the Divided Left. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
FennemaM (1997) Some conceptual issues and problems in the comparison if anti-immigrant parties in Western Europe. Party Politics3(4): 473–492.
23.
FinkelSE (1985) Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science29(4): 891–913.
24.
FordRGoodwinM (2014) Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
25.
GoldbergJHLernerJSTetlockPE (1999) Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology29: 781–795.
26.
GrabbEA (1979) Working-class authoritarianism and tolerance of outgroups; a reassessment. Public Opinion Quarterly43: 36–47.
JenningsWStokerG (2015) Two polarities of anti-politics: why trying to be friends with both UKIP and Green supporters won’t work for the mainstream parties. Available at: http://sotonpolitics.org/tag/gerry-stoker/ (accessed 5 March 2017).
33.
KangWT (2004) Protest voting and abstention under plurality rule elections: an alternative public choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics16(1): 79–102.
34.
KarpJABanducciSA (2008) Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: how electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 311–334.
35.
KaryotisGRudigW (2015) Protest participation, electoral choices and public attitudes. In: KaryotisGGerodimosR (eds) The Politics of Extreme Austerity: Greece in the Eurozone Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 123–141.
36.
KselmanDNiouE (2011) Protest voting in plurality elections: a theory of voter signaling. Public Choice148: 395–418.
37.
LernerJSGoldbergJHTetlockPE (1998) Sober second thought: the effects of accountability, anger and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(6): 563–574.
38.
LubbersMGijsbertsMScheepersP (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research41: 345–378.
39.
McGuinnessF (2012) UK Election Statistics; 1918–2012. House of Commons Library Research Paper 12/43. London: House of Commons Library.
40.
MachinS (2015) Real wages and living standards. LSE Centre for Economic Performance paper eA024. Available at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/EA024.pdf (accessed 5 March 2017).
41.
MarchL (2012) Radical Left Parties in Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
42.
MayerN (2014) The electoral impact of the crisis on the French working class: More to the right?’ In: BermeoNBartelsLM (eds) Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 266–296.
43.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
44.
NapierJLJaimeLJohnT (2008) The “Antidemocratic Personality” Revisited: A Cross-National Investigation of Working-Class Authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues64(3): 595–617.
45.
NorrisP (1999) Conclusions: the growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In: NorrisP (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–272.
46.
NorrisP (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
NorrisP (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
NorrisP (2005) Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OeschD (2008) Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review29(3): 349–373.
51.
O’NeillM (1997) Green Parties and Political Change in Contemporary Europe: New Politics, Old Predicaments. Aldershot: Ashgate.
52.
PattieCJohnstonR (2001) Losing the voters’ trust: evaluations of the political system and voting at the 1997 British General Election. British Journal of Politics and International Relations3(2): 191–222.
53.
PattynSvan HeilADhontK. (2012) Stripping the political cynic: a psychological exploration of the concept of political cynicism. European Journal of Personality26: 566–579.
54.
PoguntkeT (1993) Alternative Politics: The German Green Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
55.
Pop-ElechesG (2010) Throwing out the bums: protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism. World Politics62(2): 221–260.
56.
PowellGBJr (1986) American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review80(1): 17–43.
57.
RamiroLGomezR (2016) Radical-left populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and its competition with the established radical left. Political StudiesDOI: 10.1177/0032321716647400.
58.
SchumacherGRooduijnM (2013) Sympathy for the ‘Devil’? Voting for populists in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch general elections. Electoral Studies32: 124–133.
59.
SchaeferAStreeckW (2013) Introduction. In: SchaeferAStreeckW (eds) Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–25.
60.
TarrowS (2000) Mad cows and social activists: contentious politics in the trilateral democracies. In: PharrSPutnamRD (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 270–290.
61.
TillmanER (2016) Has the global financial crisis changed citizen behaviour? A four-country study. In: VowlesJXezonakisG (eds) Globalization and Domestic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–32.
62.
van der BrugW (2003) How the LPF fuelled discontent: empirical tests of explanations of LPF support. Acta Politica38(1): 89–106.
63.
van der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: ideological or protest vote?European Journal of Political Research37: 77–102.
64.
van der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2005) Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: a two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies38(5): 537–573.
65.
WebbP (2005) The continuing advance of the minor parties. Parliamentary Affairs58(5): 757–775.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
