Numerous studies conclude that countries in which citizens express higher levels of satisfaction with democracy also tend to display higher levels of voter turnout in national elections. Yet it is difficult to draw causal inferences from this positive cross-sectional relationship, because democracies feature many historical, cultural, and institutional differences that are not easily controlled for in cross-sectional comparisons. We apply an alternative, temporal approach to this issue by asking the question: Are over-time declines (increases) in aggregate levels of satisfaction within democracies associated with increases (declines) in levels of voter turnout within these democracies? Our temporal analysis of this relationship in 12 democracies over the period 1976–2011 reveals a pattern that is the opposite of that suggested by previous cross-sectional studies: namely, we find that over-time increases in citizens’ satisfaction with democracy are associated with significant decreases in voter turnout in national elections in these countries.
AartsKThomassenJ (2008) Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter?Electoral Studies27(1): 5–18.
2.
AartsKWesselsB (2005) Electoral turnout. In: ThomassenJacques (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–83.
3.
AlvarezRMNaglerJ (2004) Party system compactness: Consequences and measures. Political Analysis12(1): 46–62.
4.
AndersonCJ (2002) Good questions, dubious inferences, and bad solutions: Some further thoughts on satisfaction with democracy. Binghamton University, Department of Political Science, Center on Democratic PerformanceWorking Paper No. 116.
5.
AndersonCJGuilloryCA (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review91(1): 66–82.
6.
BirchS (2010) Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout. Comparative Political Studies43(12): 1601–1622.
7.
BlaisA (2000) To Vote or Not To Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8.
BlaisA (2006) What affects voter turnout?Annual Review of Political Science9(1): 111–125.
9.
BlaisACartyK (1990) Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?European Journal of Political Research18(2): 167–118.
10.
BlaisADobrzynskaA (1998) Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research33(2): 239–261.
11.
BlaisAGélineauF (2007) Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies55(2): 425–441.
12.
BudgeIKlingemannH-DVolkensA. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BurdenB (2009) The dynamic effects of education on voter turnout. Electoral Studies28(4): 540–549.
14.
CanacheDMondakJSeligsonM (2001) Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly65(4): 506–528.
15.
ClarkeHNitishDKornbergA (1993) The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in western European democracies. Journal of Politics55(4): 998–1021.
16.
ClarkeHSandersDStewartM. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DaltonR (2006) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th ed. London: Chatham House.
18.
DaltonR (2008) The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies41(7): 899–920.
19.
EastonD (1975) A reassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science5(4): 435–457.
20.
EzrowL (2007) The variance matters: How party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics69(1): 182–192.
21.
FranklinM (1999) Electoral engineering and cross-national turnout differences: What role for compulsory voting?British Journal of Political Science29(1): 205–216.
22.
FranklinM (2002) The dynamics of electoral participation. In: LeducLNiemiRNorrisP (eds) Elections and Voting in Global Perspective 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
FranklinM (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FuchsDGuidorossiGSvenssonP (1995) Support for the democratic system. In: KlingemannH-DFuchsD (eds) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 323–353.
25.
GeysB (2006) Rational theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies4(1): 16–35.
26.
GilleyB (2006) The meaning and measure of democratic legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research45(3): 499–525.
27.
GoodinRERobertsKWS (1975) The ethical voter. American Political Science Review69(3): 926–928.
28.
GrönlundKSetäläM (2007) Political trust, satisfaction and voter turnout. Comparative European Politics5(4): 400–422.
29.
GurrT (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
HadjarABeckM (2010) Who does not participate in elections in Europe and why is this?European Societies12(4): 521–542.
31.
HoboltSB (2012) Citizen satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies50(1): 88–105.
32.
KarpJABanducciSA (2008) Political efficacy and participation in twenty seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behavior. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 311–334.
33.
KittilsonMCAndersonCJ (2011) Electoral supply and voter turnout. In: DaltonRJAndersonCJ (eds) Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–54.
34.
KlingemannH-DVolkensABaraJ. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
KumlinSEsaiassonP (2012) Scandal fatigue? Scandal elections and satisfaction with democracy in western Europe. British Journal of Political Science42(2): 262–282.
36.
LijphartA (1997) Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review91(1): 1–14.
37.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
LindeJEkmanJ (2003) Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research42(3): 391–408.
39.
MarshAKaaseM (1979) Background of political action. In: BarnesSHKaaseM (eds) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 97–136.
40.
MillerAListhaugO (1990) Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden, and the United States. British Journal of Political Science29(3): 357–386.
41.
NorrisP (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
NorrisP (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PowellGB (1982) Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
PowellGB (1986) American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review80(1): 17–43.
45.
RosenstoneS (1982) Economic adversity and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science26(1): 25–46.
SteinerNDMartinCW (2012) Economic integration, party polarization, and electoral turnout: Testing for a causal chain. West European Politics35(2): 238–265.
48.
VerbaSNyeNHKimJ-O (1978) Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
