EPAC – a new dataset on ethnonationalism in party competition in 22 European democracies

Abstract

Datasets in the field of ethnic politics still tend to treat ethnonational groups as unitary actors and do not differentiate between the positions of the organizations representing these groups. Datasets in the field of party politics differentiate between the positions of political parties, yet fail convincingly to conceptualize an ethnonational dimension of competition. This Research Note presents EPAC, a new dataset on Ethnonationalism in Party Competition that seeks to fill this gap. Based on an expert survey, EPAC provides cross-sectional data on the ethnonational positions of 210 political parties in 22 multinational European democracies. The conceptualization of an ethnonational dimension of competition underlying the dataset is introduced and a series of validity and reliability tests performed. Test results show that EPAC provides valid and reliable measures of party positions on an ethnonational dimension that can serve as an empirical base for study of the causes and effects of the mobilization of ethnicity in party competition.

Keywords

Data report ethnicity Europe expert survey party competition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benoit

Laver

(2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.

Birnir

(2009) Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bochsler

Szöcsik

(2010) Where dissident Hungarian minority leaders look for success: Building bridges in Slovakia, or demarcating a Hungarian motherland in Romania? Munster, Germany, 22–27 March 2010, presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops.

Brown

(2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY and London: Guilford Press.

Budge

Klingemann

Volkens

Bara

Tanenbaum

(2001) Mapping Policy Preferences – Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Caspersen

(2010) Contested Nationalism. Serb Elite Rivalry in Croatia and Bosnia in the 1990s. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.

Cederman

L-E

Wimmer

Min

(2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics 62(1): 87–119.

Chandra

(2005) Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics 3(2): 235–252.

Coakley

(2008) Ethnic competition and the logic of party system transformation. European Journal of Political Research 47(6): 766–793.

10.

Curini

(2010) Experts’ political preferences and their impact on ideological bias. An unfolding analysis based on a Benoit–Laver expert survey. Party Politics 16(3): 299–321.

11.

Gellner

(1994) From kinship to ethnicity. In: Gellner

(ed.) Encounters with Nationalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 34–36.

12.

Granberg

Brown

(1992) The perception of ideological distance. Western Political Quarterly 45(3): 727–750.

13.

Hooghe

Bakker

Brigevich

de Vries

Edwards

Marks

Rovny

Steenbergen

Vachudova

(2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 687–703.

14.

Horowitz

(1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.

15.

Bentler

(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1–55.

16.

Klingemann

Volkens

Bara

Budge

McDonald

(2006 Mapping Policy Preferences II – Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

17.

Kymlicka

(1998) Is federalism a viable alternative to secession? In: Lehning

(ed.) Theories of Secession. London: Routledge, pp. 111–150.

18.

Marks

Hooghe

Schakel

(2008) Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies 18 (2–3): 111–121.

19.

Massetti

(2009) Explaining regionalist party positioning in a multi-dimensional ideological space: A framework for analysis. Regional and Federal Studies 19 (4–5): 501–531.

20.

Minorities at Risk Project (MAR) (2009) Minorities at Risk Dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management. Available at: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/ [accessed 13 December 2012].

21.

Protsyk

Garaz

(2011) Politicization of ethnicity in party manifestos. Party Politics Published online before print 10 June 2011, doi: 10.1177/1354068811398058.

22.

Rabushka

Shepsle

(1972) Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

23.

Robertson

(1976) A Theory of Party Competition. London: John Wiley & Sons.

24.

Schafer

Graham

(2002) Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 7(2): 147–177.

25.

Schakel

(2011) Regional election database. Maastricht University. Forthcoming at: <www.arjanschakel.nl>

26.

Steenbergen

Marks

(2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 347–366.

27.

Zuber

(2011) Beyond outbidding? Ethnic party strategies in Serbia. Party Politics. Published online before print 25 July 2011, doi: 10.1177/1354068811410368.