Previous studies have contrasted the political party systems in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) with those in more democratic countries, raising three important points: (1) the religious–secular dimension, rather than the economic or social left–right, explains the underlying political party competition; (2) left-wing politics is relatively weaker than right-wing politics; and (3) parties that are traditionally known as rightist take left-leaning positions on numerous issue dimensions, and vice versa. Even though this particular literature on party politics in the MENA has greatly improved our understanding of political dynamics in the region, these studies have either lacked quantitative evidence to support these points or their evidence was limited to single-country cases. This study aims to address this issue by analyzing original expert survey data of the ideological positions of political parties in the MENA region. Results show that in addition to the religious–secular dimension, the economic left–right divide and the pace of political reforms are highly important dimensions. The study also provides numerous examples showing that the policy stances of leftist and rightist parties are significantly reversed when MENA countries are compared with more developed democracies.
AbduljaberMKalinI (2019) Globalization and the transformation of political attitude structures at the party level in the Arab world: insights from the cases of Egypt and Jordan. Societies9(1): 24.
2.
AchilovD (2016) Revisiting political Islam: explaining the nexus between political Islam and contentious politics in the Arab World. Social Science Quarterly97(2): 252–270.
3.
AyataSAyataAG (2007) The center-left parties in Turkey. Turkish Studies8(2): 211–232.
4.
AydoganASlapinJB (2015) Left–right reversed: parties and ideology in modern Turkey. Party Politics21(4): 615–625.
5.
AydoganATunaTKadir YildirimA (2019) Ideological congruence and social media text as data. Representation55(2): 1–20.
6.
BakkerREdwardsEHoogheL, et al. (2015) “2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey.” Version 2015.1. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Available at: Chesdata.eu (accessed 6 December 2019).
BrownleeJ (2007) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BudgeIKlingemannHD (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945-1998, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
14.
BulutAT (2017) Measuring political agenda setting and representation in Turkey: introducing a new approach and data set. Party Politics23(6): 717–730.
15.
ÇarkoğluAKrouwelAYıldırımK (2019) Party competition in the Middle East: spatial competition in the post-Arab Spring era. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies46(3): 440–463.
16.
CavatortaFStormL (eds) (2018) Political Parties in the Arab World: Continuity and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17.
CiddiS (2008) The Republican People’s Party and the 2007 Turkish general elections: politics of perpetual decline?Turkish Studies9(3): 437–455.
18.
ClintonJJackmanSRiversD (2004) The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review98(2): 355–370.
19.
CuriniL (2010) Experts’ political preferences and their impact on ideological bias: an unfolding analysis based on a Benoit-Laver expert survey. Party Politics16(3): 299–321.
20.
De MiguelCJamalAATesslerM (2015) Elections in the Arab World: Why do citizens turn out?Comparative Political Studies48(11): 1355–1388.
21.
DevlinJF (1991) The Baath party: rise and metamorphosis. The American Historical Review96: 1396–1407.
22.
EyadatZ (2015) A transition without players: the role of political parties in the Arab revolutions. Democracy and Security11(2): 160–175.
23.
GelvinJL (2004) The Modern Middle East: A History. Cary: Oxford University Press.
24.
GöleN (1996) Authoritarian secularism and Islamist politics: the case of Turkey. Civil Society in the Middle East2: 17–43.
25.
GrayJSlapinJB (2012) How effective are preferential trade agreements? Ask the experts. The Review of International Organizations7(3): 309–333.
HashemiN (2009) Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Toward a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies. Cary: OUP.
29.
HinnebuschRA (2017) Political parties in MENA: their functions and development. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies44(2): 159–175.
30.
InglehartR (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
KitscheltH (2013) Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Durham: Duke University. Available at: https://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/ (accessed 6 December 2019).
32.
KitscheltHHawkinsKALunaJP, et al. (2010) Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KurzmanCNaqviI (2009) Islamic political parties and parliamentary elections. United States Institute of Peace Working Paper, 15. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
35.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
36.
LustEWaldnerD (2014) Cleavage structures and the formation of party systems: a comparative historical analysis of political dynamics in the post-Arab spring democracies. Paper presented atAnnual Meeting of American Political Science Association in 2014, Washington, DC, 28–31 August 2014.
37.
LustEWaldnerD (2016) Parties in transitional democracies: authoritarian legacy and post-authoritarian challenges in the Middle East and North Africa. In: BermeoNYasharDJ (eds) Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–189.
38.
Lust-OkarE (2006) Elections under authoritarianism: preliminary lessons from Jordan. Democratization13(3): 456–471.
39.
LyraA (2017) Fusing Islamism and Neoliberalism in Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco: A study into the economic policies of three Islamist Parties. MA Thesis, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
40.
MuasherM. (2013). The path to sustainable political parties in the Arab world. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
41.
NavotDRubinAGhanemAA (2017) The 2015 Israeli general election: the triumph of Jewish skepticism, the emergence of Arab faith. The Middle East Journal71(2): 248–268.
42.
PellicerMWegnerE (2014) Socioeconomic voter profile and motives for Islamist support in Morocco. Party Politics20(1): 116–133.
43.
PemsteinDMeserveSAMeltonJ (2010) Democratic compromise: a latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Political Analysis18(4): 426–449.
44.
RestaV (2018) Leftist parties in the Arab region before and after the Arab uprisings: unrequited love? In: CavatortaFStormL (eds) Political Parties in the Arab World: Continuity and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 23–48.
45.
RestaV (2019) The effect of electoral autocracy in Egypt’s failed transition: a party politics perspective. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica49: 1–17.
46.
ShalabyMAydoganA (2018) Elite-Citizen linkages and issue congruency under competitive authoritarianism. Parliamentary Affairs(forthcoming).
47.
SlapinJBProkschSO (2008) A scaling model for estimating time series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science52(3): 705–722.
48.
StormL (2017) Parties and party systems change. In: SzmolkaI (ed.) Political Change in the Middle East and North Africa: After the Arab Spring. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 63–89.
49.
TavitsMLetkiN (2009) When left is right: party ideology and policy in postcommunist Europe. American Political Science Review103(4): 555–569.
50.
WegnerECavatortaF (2018) Revisiting the Islamist–Secular divide: parties and voters in the Arab world. International Political Science Review40: 558–575.
51.
WegnerEPellicerM (2011) Left–Islamist opposition cooperation in Morocco. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies38(3): 303–322.
52.
WiesehomeierNBenoitK (2009) Presidents, parties, and policy competition. The Journal of Politics71(4): 1435–1447.
53.
WolfA (2018) Former RCD officials stage a comeback in municipal elections in Tunisia. The Journal of North African Studies23(4): 551–556.
54.
YerkesSYahmedZB (2019) Tunisia’s Political System: From Stagnation to Competition. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
55.
YildirimAK (2016) Muslim Democratic Parties in the Middle East: Economy and Politics of Islamist Moderation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
