Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article investigates the politics of defections and alliances in South Africa in the period 2000 to 2004. The analysis links the debates on defections within proportional representation with the associated changes in party representational strengths, and the political imperatives of consolidating parties and stabilizing party systems. The analysis tracks the issue of disproportionality over time, covering defections and elections in the period, through the 2004 national and provincial elections. Defections were used in conjunction with party alliances to forge power shifts. The defections created the direction and momentum for party political realignment that carried over into post-defection elections. The cumulative practical result of the defection–alliance–election chain of events in South Africa was a party system that was further stabilized in the dominant-party mode, combining with both modest opposition consolidation and fragmentation among the microparties.

Keywords

alliances defections elections floor-crossing party systems proportional representation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANC (2003) ‘ Floor-Crossing–Window Closes on “Fight Back” Alliance ’, ANC Today 13, 4–10 April 2003.

Bogaards, M. (2001) ‘Electoral Choices for Divided Societies: Moderation Through Constituency Pooling and Vote Pooling’. Workshop on Parties, Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in the Third World, 6–11 April. Grenoble.

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996) Pretoria. Constitutional

Court of South Africa (4 October 2002) Case No. CCT 23/02. Available at: http://www.concourt.gov.za/files/udm

Constitutional Court (4 October 2002) Summary of Judgment. Johannesburg.

Devenish, G. (2003) ‘Political Musical Chairs–The Saga of Floor-Crossing and the Constitution’, Seminar paper. Howard College, University of Natal (25 April). Durban.

Du Plessis, N. (2001) ‘An Electoral System for South Africa’. Pretoria. Unpublished document.

EISA (Electoral Institute of Southern Africa ) (27 October 2002) ‘South Africa: FloorCrossing’. Available at: www.eisa.org.za/WEP/southafrica_floorcross.htm

EISA (8 February 2005) ‘Regional Roundup’. Daily electronic events broadcast from www.eisa.org.za

10.

Eiseman, M. (2002) ‘South Africa: Floor-Crossing’, Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA). Available at: www.eisa.org.za/WEP/southafrica_floorcross.htm

11.

Graham, P. (2003) ‘ Opening the Door to Crossing the Floor ’, Democracy in Action 11: 6–7 .

12.

Harris, P. and B. Reilly (eds) (1998) Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators. IDEA Handbook Series, Stockholm: IDEA .

13.

Hofmeyr, J. and B. Rice (2000) ‘Working with the African National Congress’, Commitment-led Marketing. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons .

14.

IDASA (Institute for Democracy in South Africa) (2002) First Amicus Curiae's written argument. Case No. CCT 23/02, Constitutional Court of South Africa .

15.

IDASA (2003) ‘Floor-crossing at a Glance’. Available at: http://www.idasact.org.za

16.

IDEA (1999) Democracy Report for Malawi. Stockholm: IDEA .

17.

IDEA (2000) Democracy Report for Jamhuri Ya Kenya. Stockholm: IDEA .

18.

IEC (Electoral Commission) (2002) IEC press statement. Pretoria.

19.

IEC (2005) Available at: http://www.elections.org.za

20.

Janda, K. (1980) Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press .

21.

Kuenzi, M. and G. Lambright (2003) ‘ Party Institutionalization in 30 African Countries ’, Party Politics 9: 485–501 .

22.

Lane, J. and S. O. Ersson (1987) Politics and Society in Western Europe . London: Sage .

23.

Lijphart, A. (1991) ‘ Double-Checking the Evidence ’, Journal of Democracy 2: 42–48 .

24.

Lindberg, S. (2005) ‘ Consequences of Electoral Systems in Africa: A Preliminary Enquiry ’, Electoral Studies 24: 41–64 .

25.

Matlosa, K. (2003) Survey of Electoral Systems and Reform Imperatives in the SADC Region. EISA Occasional Paper No. 12. Johannesburg: EISA .

26.

Miskin, S. (2003) ‘Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship’, Research Paper 4, 2002–2003. Politics and Public Administration Group, Australian Parliament .

27.

Montgomery, K. A. (1999) ‘ Electoral Effects on Party Behavior and Development: Evidence from the Hungarian National Assembly ’, Party Politics 5: 507–523 .

28.

Pridham, G. (2002) ‘ Coalition Behaviour in New Democracies of Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Slovakia ’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18: 75–102 .

29.

Rakner, L. and L. Svåsand (2004) ‘ From Dominant to Competitive Party System: The Zambia Experience 1991–2001 ’, Party Politics 10: 49–68 .

30.

Randall, V. and L. Svåsand (2001) ‘ Party Institutionalization in New Democracies ’, Party Politics 7: 543–565 .

31.

Rapoo, T. (2002) ‘Voters Vote for People and Parties’, Synopsis 6(3). (December). Newsletter, Centre for Policy Studies .

32.

Reilly, B. (2002) ‘ Political Engineering and Party Politics in Papua New Guinea ’, Party Politics 8: 701–718 .

33.

Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

34.

Schrire, R. (2002) ‘Expert Evidence to the Constitutional Court’, Case No. CCT 23/02. Available at: http://www.concourt.gov.za/files/udm

35.

Sitter, N. (2002) ‘ Cleavages, Party Strategy and Party System Change in Europe, East and West ’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 3: 425–452 .

36.

Slinn, P. (1996) ‘ Floor-Crossing in Zambia ’, Journal of African Law 40: 115–118 .

37.

Steytler, N. (1997) ‘ Parliamentary Democracy–the Anti-Defection Clause ’, Law, Democracy and Development 1: 221–231 .

The Will of the Parties Versus the Will of the People?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References