It was to be expected that New Zealand's radical change from a simple-plurality, single-constituency system to a proportional electoral system would produce a multi-party rather than a two-party parliamentary system. Analysis of the mixed-member proportional system's impact on the number and significance of parties, parliamentary cohesion and fragmentation, the power relationship between parties and government, and issue dimensions demonstrates that the impact of the exogenously derived incentives have been moderated by endogenous systemic and institutional forces and, also, by societal characteristics and habits. The brief period since the introduction of proportional representation to New Zealand thus provides an interesting example of how much change can be expected in the short term from electoral system change.
Aimer, E. P. (1997) `The Future of the Party System', in R. Miller (ed.) New Zealand Politics in Transition, pp. 186-195. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
2.
Alley, R. (1978) `Parliamentary Parties in Office: Government-Backbench Relations', in S. Levine (ed.) Politics in New Zealand, pp. 96-112. Auckland: George Allen and Unwin.
3.
Bale, T. and P. Kopecky (1998) `Can Young Pups Teach an Old Dog New Tricks? Lessons for British Reformers from Eastern Europe's New Constitutional Democracies', The Journal of Legislative Studies4(2): 149-169.
4.
Banducci, S., J. Karp and J. Vowles (1998) `Vote Splitting Under MMP', in Vowles et al. (eds), pp. 111-19.
5.
Barker, F. (1998) `Party Policy Positioning: The New Zealand Labour Party in Opposition 1990-1996', unpublished MA thesis in Political Science, Victoria University of Wellington.
6.
Blondel, J. (1995) `Consensual Politics and Multi-Party Systems', Australian Journal of Political Science30: 7-26.
7.
Boston, J. and E. McLeay (1997) `Forming the First MMP Government: Theory, Practice and Prospects', in Boston et al. (eds), pp. 207-46.
8.
Boston, J. , S. Levine, E. McLeay and N. S. Roberts (1996a) New Zealand Under MMP: A New Politics?Auckland: Auckland University Press/Bridget Williams Books.
9.
Boston, J. , S. Levine, E. McLeay and N. S. Roberts (1996b) `Why did New Zealand Adopt German-Style Proportional Representation?', Representation33: 134-140.
10.
Boston, J. , S. Levine, E. McLeay and N. S. Roberts (1997a) `Experimenting with Coalition Government: Preparing to Manage Under Proportional Representation in New Zealand', Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics35(3): 108-126.
11.
Boston, J. , S. Levine, E. McLeay and N. S. Roberts, eds (1997b) From Campaign to Coalition: New Zealand's First General Election Under Proportional Representation. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
12.
Brechtel, T. and A. Kaiser (1999) `Party System and Coalition Formation in Post-Reform New Zealand', Political Science51: 3-26.
13.
Catt, H. (1997a) `Representation' in R. Miller (ed.) New Zealand Politics in Transition, pp. 397-407. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
14.
Catt, H. (1997b) `Women, Maori and Minorities: Microrepresentation and MMP', in Boston et al. (eds), pp. 199-205.
15.
Catt, H. , P. Harris and N. S. Roberts (1992) Voter's Choice: Electoral Change in New Zealand?Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
16.
Chief Electoral Office (1997) Review of the 1996 General Election, Appendix M. Wellington: Chief Electoral Office.
17.
Church, S. (1998) `Electoral Systems, Party Systems and Stability in New Zealand 1856-1996', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
18.
Church, S. (1999) `Partisan Defection in the New Zealand Parliament 1993-1999', paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australasian Political Science Association, Sydney, 1999.
19.
Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties. London: Methuen.
Electoral Commission (1997a) Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 1997. Wellington: Electoral Commission.
22.
Electoral Commission (1997b) The New Zealand Electoral Compendium. Wellington: Electoral Commission.
23.
Gallagher, M. (1998) `The Political Impact of Electoral System Change in Japan and New Zealand, 1996', Party Politics4: 203-228.
24.
Harris, P. (1997) `Changing New Zealand's Electoral System: Continuity or Crisis?', in Boston et al. (eds), pp. 13-23.
25.
Hawke, G. , ed. (1993) Changing Politics? The Electoral Referendum 1993. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
26.
Hazan, R. Y. (1996) `Does Center Equal Middle? Towards a Conceptual Delineation, with Application to West European Party Systems', Party Politics2: 209-228.
27.
Jackson, K. (1987) The Dilemma of Parliament. Wellington: George Allen and Unwin.
28.
Jackson, K. and McRobie, A. (1998) New Zealand Adopts Proportional Representation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
29.
Kaiser, A. (1997) `Types of Democracy: From Classical to New Institutionalism', Journal of Theoretical Politics9(4): 419-443.
30.
Klinkum, G. (1999) `Parliamentary Research Services in New Zealand, Australia and Canada', unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
31.
Levine, S. (1996) `Elite Expectations about the Effects of Proportional Representation: Survey Data about the Consequences of Electoral System Change in a Small Democracy', paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, 29 August-1 September.
32.
Levine, S. and N. S. Roberts (1992) `Policies and Political Perspectives: The Importance of Issues and Problems in New Zealand Electoral Behaviour' in M. Holland (ed.) Electoral Behaviour in New Zealand, pp. 71-93. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
33.
Levine, S. and N. S. Roberts (1997) `Surveying the Snark: Voting Behaviour in the 1996 New Zealand General Election' in Boston et al. (eds), pp. 183-97.
34.
Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Lijphart, A. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: The Free Press.
37.
McLeay, E. (1987) `Selection Versus Election: Choosing Cabinets in New Zealand', in H. D. Clarke and M. M. Czudnowski (eds) Political Elites in Anglo-American Democracies, pp. 280-306. Dekalb, IL, Northern Illinois University Press.
38.
McLeay, E. (1993) `Women's Parliamentary Representation: A Comparative Perspective', in H. Catt and E. M. McLeay (eds) Women and Politics in New Zealand, pp. 40-62. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
39.
McLeay, E. (1995) The Cabinet and Political Power in New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
40.
McLeay, E. (1997) `Forming a Government', Legislative Studies11(2): 23-34.
41.
McLeay, E. (1999) `What is the Constitutional Status of the New Zealand Cabinet Office Manual?'Public Law Review10(1): 11-17.
42.
McRobie, A. , ed. (1993) Taking it to the People? The New Zealand Electoral Referendum Debate. Christchurch: Hazard Press.
43.
Mitchell, A. (1966) Government by Party. Christchurch: Whitcombe and Tombs.
44.
Mitchell, A. (1968) `Caucus: The New Zealand Parliamentary Parties', Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies6: 3-33.
45.
Nagel, J. H. (1994) `How many parties will New Zealand have under MMP?', Political Science46(2): 139-160.
46.
New Zealand House of Representatives (1995) Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. Wellington: House of Representatives.
47.
Palmer, G. and M. Palmer (1997) Bridled Power: New Zealand Government under MMP. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
48.
Royal Commission on the Electoral System (1986) Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy. Wellington: Government Printer.
49.
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Shamir, M. (1985) `Changes in Electoral Systems as “Interventions”: Another Test of Duverger's Hypothesis', European Journal of Political Research13(1): 1-10.
51.
Standing Orders Committee (1995) Report of the Standing Orders Committee on the Review of Standing Orders. Wellington: New Zealand House of Representatives.
52.
Taagepera, R. and Grofman, B. (1985) `Rethinking Duverger's Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems - Parties Minus Issues Equals One', European Journal of Political Research13: 341-352.
53.
Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M. S. (1993) `Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger's Mechanical Effect', American Political Science Review87: 455-464.
54.
Vowles, J. (1998) `Countdown to MMP', in Vowles et al. (eds), pp. 12-27.
55.
Vowles, J. and P. Aimer (1993) Voters' Vengeance: The 1990 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of the Fourth Labour Government. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
56.
Vowles, J. , P. Aimer, H. Catt, J. Lamare and R. Miller (1995) Towards Consensus? The 1993 General Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
57.
Vowles, J. , P. Aimer, S. Banducci and J. Karp, eds (1998) Voters' Victory? New Zealand's First Election Under Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
