Speltini and Passini manuscript points to a theoretical framework for exploring the psychosocial dimensions of the issue of cleanliness addressing the clean/dirty and pure/impure antinomies. In particular, the authors discuss the symbolic and normative valence of the issue of cleanliness and demonstrate its social and cultural rootedness feeding negative attitudes and adverse emotions towards persons and groups. Elaborating on the arguments of Speltini and Passini, I endorse the conceptual overlapping between the issue of cleanliness and the dialogical notion of basic themata. In the background of social representation theory, the process of anchoring serves as context for addressing this conceptual overlapping and for challenging the profound interrelationship between the issue of cleanliness and the theme of intergroup dynamics and inter-ethnic encounters.
Abric, J. C. (1996). Specific processes of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 5(1), 77–80.
3.
BerryJ. W. (2005) Acculturation: Living successful in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations29(6): 697–712.
4.
BerryJ. W. (2006) Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Research30: 719–734.
5.
BerryJ. W. (2008) Globalization and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations32: 328–336.
6.
DoiseW. (2002) La forza delle idee. Rappresentazioni Sociali e diritti umani [The power of ideas. Social Representations and Human Rights], Bologna: Il Mulino.
7.
DoiseW. (2003) Human rights: Common meaning and differences in positioning. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa19(3): 201–210.
8.
DoiseW. (2010) Confini ed Identità. La costruzione sociale dei diritti umani [Boundaries and identity. The social construction of human rights], Bologna: Il Mulino.
9.
GeloO. C. G.VileiA.MadduxJ. E.GennaroA.Psychopathology as social construction: The case of anorexia nervosa. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. (in press. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/upcy20/current#.UzMh1_khBgg.
10.
GuimelliC.RiméB. (2009) Émotions et représentations sociales [Emotions and social representations]. In: P. RateauP. Moliner (ed) Représentations sociales et processus sociocognitifs [Social representations and socio-cognitive processes], Rennes: PUR, pp. 165–180.
11.
HoltonG. (1978) The scientific imagination: Case studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HoltonG. (1996) The role of themata in science. Foundations of Physics26(4): 453–465.
13.
JoffeH. (2002) Social representations and health psychology. Social Science Information41(4): 559–580.
14.
Kalampalikis, N., & Haas, V. (2008). More than a theory: A new map of social thought. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 449–459.
15.
LiuL. (2004) Sensitising concept, themata and shareness: A dialogical perspective of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior34(3): 249–264.
16.
MarkovàI. (2000) Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology6(4): 419–460.
17.
MarkovàI. (2003) Dialogicality and social representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MarkovàI. (2009) Dialogicità e conoscenza [Dialogicality and knowledge]. In: PalmonariA.EmilianiF. (eds) Paradigmi delle rappresentazioni sociali [Paradigms of social representations], Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 211–252.
19.
MoloneyG.HallR.Walker, I. (2005) Social representations and themata: The construction and functioning of social knowledge about donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology44: 415–444.
20.
MoloneyG.WilliamsJ.Blair, D. (2012) Cognitive polyphasia, themata and blood donation: Between or within representation. Papers on Social Representations21: 4.1–4.12.
21.
MoscoviciS. (1961/1976) La psychanalyse: Son image et son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public], Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
22.
MoscoviciS. (1984) The phenomena of social representations. In: FarrR.M.MoscoviciS. (eds) Social representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–69.
23.
MoscoviciS. (1992, October) Discorso presentato alla prima Conferenza Internazionale sulle Rappresentazioni Sociali [Lecture presented at the International Conference on Social Representations], Ravello, Italy.. Retrieved from http://www.serge-moscovici.fr/documents/Themata.pdf.
24.
MoscoviciS. (1993) Introductory address. Papers on Social Representations2(3): 160–170.
25.
MoscoviciS. (2001) Why a theory of social representations? In: DeauxK.PhilogéneG. (eds) Representations of the social, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 8–35.
26.
MoscoviciS.MarkovàI. (1998) Presenting social representations: A conversation. Culture and Psychology4(3): 371–410.
27.
MoscoviciS.Vignaux, G. (1994) Le concept de themata [The concept of themata ]. In: GuimelliC. (ed) Structures et transformations des representations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations], Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestle University Press, pp. 25–72.
28.
MoscoviciS.Vignaux, G. (2000) The concept of themata. In: MoscoviciS. (ed) Social representations: Explorations in social psychology, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 156–183.
29.
NavasM.GarcìaM. C.SánchezJ.RojasA. J.PumaresP., &FernándezJ. S. (2005) Relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations29: 21–37.
30.
RizkallahÈ.“The possible and the actual”. Endeavour(s) through dynamic and semiotic model of meaning. Semiotics and Social Representation: A Mutual Cultivation. Special Issue of Papers on Social Representations. (in press. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/.
31.
RuggieriR.RochiraA.Semiotics and social representations: A figure-and-ground relationship of mutual cultivation. Semiotics and Social Representation: A Mutual Cultivation. Special Issue of Papers on Social Representations. (in press. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/.
32.
SpeltiniG.PassiniS.Cleanliness/dirtiness, purity/impurity as social and psychological issues. Culture & Psychology20(2): 203–219.
33.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.MartinezC. M.SchwarzwaldJ.Tur-KaspaM. (1998) Prejudice towards immigrant to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology29: 559–576.
34.
Valsiner, J. Creating sign hierarchies: Social representation in its dynamic context Semiotics and Social Representation: A Mutual Cultivation. Special Issue of Papers on Social Representations (in press). Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/.
35.
ZarateA. M.GarciaB.GarzaA. A.HitlancR. T. (2004) Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40: 99–105.
36.
ZittounT.Valences, traces and new synthesis in social representing. Commentary of J. Valsiner's creating sign hierarchies. Semiotics and Social Representation: a Mutual Cultivation. Special Issue of Papers on Social Representations. (in press. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/.
