I offer an interpretation of Ernst E. Boesch's theory of symbolic action focusing on the usually overlooked phenomenological and existential aspects of this cultural-psychological approach. This interpretation raises the more general question about the role that subjectivity plays in cultural-psychological studies. It is argued that, depending on the concept of meaning that is assumed, cultural studies can be divided in to two main streams, namely the hermeneutic-historicist and the phenomenological-existentialist perspectives. The theoretical consequence of this dual program is the so-called `micro—macro problem'. Boesch's concept of action field is interpreted here as a meso-unit: it is unfolded within an objective system of reference; but at the same time, it is oriented toward the future from the personal perspective of a subject. This existential aspect of Boesch's theory serves to illustrate the theoretical need for the consideration of the phenomenological dimension in cultural studies.
Baltes, P.B. (1997). Ernst B. Boesch at 80: Reflections from a student on the culture of psychology. Culture & Psychology, 3, 247—256.
2.
Boesch, E.E. (1971). Zwischen zwei Wirklichkeiten: Prolegomena zu einer ökologischen Psychologie [Between two realities: Prolegomena to an ecological psychology]. Bern: Huber.
3.
Boesch, E.E. (1983). Das Magische und das Schöne: Zur Symbolik von Objekten und Handlungen [The magical and the beautiful: On the symbolism of objects and actions]. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
4.
Boesch, E.E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology . New York: Springer.
5.
Boesch, E.E. (2001). Symbolic action theory in cultural psychology . Culture & Psychology, 7, 479—483.
6.
Brandtstädter, J. (1997). Action, culture and development: Points of convergence . Culture & Psychology, 3, 335—352.
7.
Brentano, F. (1924). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from an empirical point of view] (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Meiner. (Original work published 1874.)
8.
Cole, M. (1995). Culture and cognitive development: from cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture & Psychology, 1, 25—54.
9.
Cornejo, C. (2004). Who says what the words say? The problem of linguistic meaning in psychology. Theory &Psychology, 14, 5—28.
10.
Cornejo, C. (2005). Sign, voice, and discourse: Three semiotic analysis units in contrast. In A. Gülerce, A. Hofmeister, I. Steauble , G. Saunders, & J. Kay (Eds.), Contemporary theorizing in psychology: Global perspectives (pp. 282—290). Concord : Captus .
11.
Cornejo, C. (2006). Psychology in times of anti-mentalism. Social Practice/Psychological Theorizing, Article 3 (retrieved 11 April 2006, from http://sppt-gulerce.boun.edu.tr.html).
12.
Dilthey, W. (1968). Ideen für eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie: Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften 1894 [Ideas for a descriptive and analytical psychology: Proceedings of the Berlin Academy of Sciences]. In W. Dilthey, Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. V) (pp. 139—240). Stuttgart: Teubner . (Original work published 1894.)
13.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1894.)
14.
Eckensberger, L.H. (1997). The legacy of Boesch's intellectual oeuvre. Culture & Psychology, 3, 277—298.
15.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). London: Continuum . (Original work published 1960.)
16.
Groeben, N. (1997). Einleitung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Psychologie-Konzeption zwischen Natur- und Geisteswissenschaft [Introduction: Social conception of psychology between the natural sciences and the human sciences]. In N. Groeben (Ed.), Zur Programmatik einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Vol. 1: Metatheoretische Perspektiven. 1st. Part: Gegenstandsverständnis, Menschenbilder, Methodologie und Ethik (pp. 1—26). Münster : Aschendorff.
17.
Groeben, N. (1999). Fazit: Die metatheoretischen Merkmale einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie [Metatheoretical features of psychology as a social science]. In N. Groeben (Ed.), Zur Programmatik einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Vol. 1: Metatheoretische Perspektiven. 2nd. Part: Theoriehistorie, Praxisrelevanz, Interdiszilinarität, Methodenintegration (pp. 311—404). Mänster: Aschendorff .
18.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford : Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1807.)
19.
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1846.)
20.
Kreppner, K. (1997). Cultural psychology and the problem of exchange between individual and environment: Is there a common concept?Culture & Psychology, 3, 405—422.
21.
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. ( 1993). Culture and cognitive development. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: History, theory and methods (pp. 295—356). New York : Wiley.
22.
Lang, A. (1997). Thinking rich as well as simple: Boesch's cultural psychology in semiotic perspective. Culture & Psychology , 3, 383—394.
23.
Oettingen, G. (1997). Culture and future thinking. Culture & Psychology, 3, 353—381.
24.
Overton, W.F. (1997). Beyond dichotomy: An embodied active agent for cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 3, 315—334.
25.
Simão, L.M. (2001). Boesch's symbolic action theory in interaction . Culture & Psychology, 7, 485—493.
26.
Simão, L.M. (2005). Bildung, culture and self: A possible dialogue with Gadamer, Boesch and Valsiner? Theory &Psychology , 15, 549—574.
27.
Staudinger, U.M. (1997). Cultural psychology and the art of life: Some thoughts on the work of Ernst E. Boesch. Culture & Psychology , 3, 299—314.
28.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children's action (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
29.
Valsiner, J. (2006). Developmental epistemology and implications for methodology. In R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 166—209). New York : Wiley.
30.
Vorderer, P., & Valsiner, J. (1999). (Sozial-)Psychologie und Soziologie—Oder: Das Mikro—Makro-Problem(-Bewußtsein) [(Social) Psychology and sociology — Or the (consciousness about the) micro—macro problem]. In N. Groeben (Ed.), Zur Programmatik einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Vol. 1: Metatheoretische Perspektiven. 2. Part: Theoriehistorie, Praxisrelevanz, Interdisziplinarität, Methodenintegration (pp. 115—149). Münster: Aschendorff.
31.
Wertsch, J.V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children's learning in the `zone of proximal development' (pp. 7—17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
