Some remarks are presented reflecting recent implications of Boesch’s symbolic action theory for the development of studies concerned with the relationship between verbal interaction and knowledge construction. In doing so, attempts are made to improve the interlocution of Boesch’s account with other significant semiotic-constructivist propositions.
Baltes, P.B.
(2001). Boesch at 85 on cultural psychology: Foreword. Culture & Psychology, 7(4), 477–478.
2.
Baltes, P.B.
, & Staudinger, U.M. (1996) Interactive minds in a life-span perspective: Prologue. In P.B. Baltes & U.M. Staudinger (Eds.) Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition(pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Boesch, E.E. (1980). Action et objet: Deux sources de l’identitÈ du moi. In P. Tap (Ed.), IdentitÈ individuelle et personalization(Vol. 2, pp. 23–37), Toulouse: Privat.
4.
Boesch, E.E.
(1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5.
Boesch, E.E. (1993). The sound of the violin. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 52(2), 70–81.
6.
Boesch, E.E.
(1997). Reasons for a symbolic concept of action. Culture & Psychology, 3(3), 423–431.
7.
Boesch, E.E. (2000). Das lauernde Chaos: Mythen und Fiktionen im Alltag. Bern: Huber.
8.
Boesch, E.E.
(2001). Symbolic action theory in cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 7(4), 479–483.
9.
Branco, A.U.
, & Valsiner, J. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivistic study of goal orientantions in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(1), 35–65.
10.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1997). The legacy of Boesch’s intellectual oeuvre. Culture & Psychology, 3(3), 277–298.
11.
Eckensberger, L.H.
(1999, Spring). Cultural approaches to psychology. Lecture at the M.S. University of Baroda, India.
12.
Engelmann, A. (1985). Comportamento verbal e relato verbal. Psicologia, 11(1), 1–6.
13.
Graumann, C.F.
(1995). Commonality, mutuality, reciprocity: Aconceptual introduction. In I. Markov·, C.F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue(pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H.J.M.
(1999b). The innovative potentials of agreement and disagreement in dialogical history: Comment on Lyra. Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 491–498.
Markov·, I.
, Graumann, C., & Foppa, K. (Eds.). (1995). Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Oliveira, M.S., & Simāo, L.M. (2000, July). InteraÁāo verbal e construÁāo de conhecimento por dÌades de crianÁas: Uma an·lise segundo a concepÁāo boeschiana de ‘valor visado’ e ‘valor real’. Part of the doctoral thesis of the first author under direction of the second, presented at the 3rd Conference for Sociocultural Research, Campinas, Sāo Paulo, Brazil.
19.
Overton, W.F.
(1997). Beyond dichotomy: An embodied active agent for cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 3(3), 315–334.
20.
Schegloff, E.A.
(1993). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition(pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: APA.
21.
Simāo, L.M. (1989). InteraÁāo pesquisador–sujeito: Aperspectiva da aÁāo social na construÁāo do conhecimento. CiÍncia e Cultura, 41(12), 1195–1202.
22.
Simāo, L.M. (1992). InteraÁāo verbal e construÁāo de conhecimento: Aspectos do di·logo pesquisador–sujeito. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 8(2), 219–229.
23.
Simāo, L.M. (1999a). AÁāo, interaÁāo, objeto e cultura: a contribuiÁāo de Ernst Boesch. Anais do I Congresso Norte Nordeste de Psicologia/V Semana Baiana de Psicologia. Versāo CD-ROM.
24.
Simāo, L.M. (1999b, October). A noÁāo de objeto e a concepÁāo de sujeito em Ernst Boesch.Paper presented in the context of the round-table ‘NoÁāo de objeto, concepÁāo de sujeito: Freud, Piaget e Boesch’ (L.M. Simāo, org.), at the XXIX Reuniāo Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia, Campinas, SP.
25.
Simāo, L.M.
(2000, July). The role of the other in the process of knowledge construction during interactions: Developments from the Symbolic Action Theory of Ernst Boesch. Paper presented at the Symposium Interaction: Models in Discussion, 3rd Conference for Sociocultural Research, Campinas, Sāo Paulo, Brazil.
26.
Simāo, L.M. (2001, July). Duas concepÁies complementares de aÁāo comunicativa: Habermas e Boesch. Paper presented at the 28th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Santiago, Chile.
27.
Simāo, L.M., Bettoi, W., Cyrus, D.H.T., & Oliveira, M.S. (2001, May). A pesquisa de processos de construÁāo de conhecimento durante interaÁies sociais: algumas questies teÛrico metodolÛgicas. Presented at the II Congresso Norte-Nordeste de Psicologia. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
28.
Valsiner, J.
(1997a) Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
29.
Valsiner, J.
(1997b). Dialogical models of psychological processes: Capturing dynamics of development. Polish Quarterly of Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 155–160.
30.
Valsiner, J.
(1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Valsiner, J.
(2000, July). Interaction as hypergame: Development under uncertainty. Paper presented at the Symposium ‘Interaction: Models in Discussion’, 3rd Conference for Sociocultural Research, Campinas, Sāo Paulo, Brazil.
32.
Valsiner, J.
, & Leung, M.-C. (1991). Cultural transmission as a co-constructive internalization process: Novel (Re)construction of constraint systems by the developing mind. Paper presented to the Symposium ‘The Socio-historical Context of Development’, XI Biennial Meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Minneapolis, MN.
