A wealth of research in comparative politics and international relations examines how the military intervenes in politics via coups. We shift attention to broader forms of military involvement in politics beyond coups and claim that terrorist violence and the threat of terror attacks provide a window of opportunity for military intervention, without taking full control of state institutions. We highlight two mechanisms through which terrorism influences military involvement in politics: (1) government authorities demand military expertise to fight terrorism and strengthen national security and “pull” the armed forces into politics, and (2) state armed actors exploit their informational advantage over civilian authorities to “push” their way into politics and policy-making. A panel data analysis shows that domestic terror attacks and perceived threats from domestic and transnational terrorist organizations increase military involvement in politics. We illustrate the theoretical mechanisms with the cases of France (1995–1998 and 2015–2016) and Algeria (1989–1992).
AcemogluDJohnsonSRobinsonJA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review91(5): 1369–1401.
2.
Aït-AoudiaM (2015) L’expérience Démocratique En Algérie (1988–1992): Apprentissages Politiques et Changement de Régime. Académique. Presses de Sciences Po.
3.
AksoyDCarterDBWrightJ (2012) Terrorism in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics74(3): 810–826. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000400
4.
AksoyDCarterDBWrightJ (2015) Terrorism and the fate of dictators. World Politics67(3): 423–468.
5.
AlexanderMSBankwitzPCF (1994) From Politiques en képi to Military Technocrats: De Gaulle and the Recovery of the French Army after Indochina and Algeria. In: AndreopoulosGJSeleskyHE (eds) The Aftermath of Defeat: Societies, Armed Forces, and the Challenge of Recovery. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 79–102.
6.
AllisonGTHalperinMH (1972) Bureaucratic politics: a paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics24(S1): 40–79.
7.
AsalVDe la CalleLFindleyMet al. (2012) Killing civilians or holding territory? How to think about terrorism. International Studies Review14(3): 475–497.
8.
BellCSudduthJK (2017) The causes and outcomes of coup during civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(7): 1432–1455.
9.
BoveVNisticoR (2014a) Coups d’état and defense spending: a counterfactual analysis. Public Choice161(3-4): 321–344.
10.
BoveVNisticòR (2014b) Military in politics and budgetary allocations. Journal of Comparative Economics42(4): 1065–1078.
11.
BoveVRiveraM (2015) Elite co-optation, repression, and coups in autocracies. International Interactions41(3): 453–479.
12.
BrooksR (2008) Shaping Strategy: The Civil-Military Politics of Strategic Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
BrooksRA (2019) Integrating the civil–military relations subfield. Annual Review of Political Science22(1): 379–398.
14.
CareySCColaresiMPMitchellNJ (2016) Risk mitigation, regime security, and militias: beyond coup-proofing. International Studies Quarterly60(1): 59–72.
15.
ClarkeKA (2009) Return of the phantom menace: omitted variable bias in political research. Conflict Management and Peace Science26(1): 46–66.
16.
ClearA (2005) Politics: from endurance to evolution. In: BresnanJ (ed) Indonesia: The Great Transition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 137–188.
17.
ConradCRConradJWalshJIet al. (2017) Who tortures the terrorists? Transnational terrorism and military torture. Foreign Policy Analysis13(4): 761–786.
18.
CookSA (2007) Ruling but Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria, and Turkey. A Council on foreign relations book. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
CruzPScartasciniC (2016) Database of Political Institutions Codebook, 2015 update (dpi2015).
20.
DahoG (2017) La Transformation Des Armées: Enquête Sur Les Relations Civilo-Militaires En France. Le (bien) commun. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
21.
DavisDWSilverBD (2004) Civil liberties vs. security: public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science48(1): 28–46.
22.
DeschMC (2001) Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
23.
DionnetJP (2004) Métier Militaire et Enrôlement Citoyen : Les Enjeux de la Loi du 28 Octobre 1997. Paris: Cahiers des sciences morales et politiques.
24.
DreherAGassebnerMSchaudtP (2017) The Effect of Migration on Terror - Made at Home or Imported from Abroad? ID 2976273, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 1 September. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2976273 (accessed 4 March 2019).
25.
EndersWSandlerTGaibulloevK (2011) Domestic versus transnational terrorism: data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research48(3): 319–337.
26.
EntelisJ (1992) The crisis of authoritarianism in North Africa: the case of Algeria. Problems of Communism41(3): 71–81.
27.
EzrowNMFrantzE (2011) Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. London: Bloomsbury Continuum.
28.
FeaverPD (1999) Civil-military relations. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 211–241.
29.
FeaverPD (2009) Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
FinerS (1975) The Man on Horseback: Military Intervention into Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
31.
FlynnME (2014) Military leadership, institutional change, and priorities in military spending. Foreign Policy Analysis10(2): 103–126.
32.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: a new data set. Perspectives on Politics12(2): 313–331.
33.
GelpiCAvdanN (2018) Democracies at risk? A forecasting analysis of regime type and the risk of terrorist attack. Conflict Management and Peace Science35(1): 18–42.
34.
GelpiCFeaverPD (2002) Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. American Political Science Review96(4): 779–793.
35.
GoemansHE (2008) Which way out?: the manner and consequences of losing office. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(6): 771–794.
36.
GregoryS (2000) French Defence Policy into the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
GuittetE (2008) 13. L’implication de l’armée dans la lutte antiterroriste: le cas français. In: Cahiers libres. Paris: La Découverte, 188–193.
38.
HalperinMH (1974) Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
39.
HowellLD (2011) International Country Risk Guide Methodology. East Syracuse, NY: PRS Group.
40.
HundmanEParkinsonSE (2019) Rogues, degenerates, and heroes: disobedience as politics in military organizations. European Journal of International Relations. Epub ahead of print 4 February 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1354066118823891.
41.
HuntingtonS (1957) The Soldier and the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
InciyanE (1997) La militarisation de « Vigipirate » suscite des inquiétudes dans la police. Le Monde, 24January.
43.
IrondelleB (2008) Démocratie, relations civilo-militaires et efficacité militaire. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée15(1): 117–131.
44.
IrondelleB (2011) La Réforme des Armées en France. Sociologie de la Décision. Académique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).
45.
IsnardJ (1999) L’armée française en quête d’une éthique. Le Monde, 4March.
46.
KarlTL (1990) Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics23(1): 1–21.
47.
KruegerABMalečkováJ (2003) Education, poverty and terrorism: is there a causal connection?Journal of Economic Perspectives17(4): 119–144.
48.
KyddAWalterBF (2002) Sabotaging the peace: the politics of extremist violence. International Organization56(2): 263–296.
49.
LahouariA (2002) Army, state and nation in Algeria. In: KooningKKruijtD (eds) Political Armies: The Military and Nation Building in the Age of Democracy. London: Zed Press, 179–203.
50.
LasswellHD (1941) The garrison state. American Journal of Sociology46(4): 455–468.
51.
LenzePDJ (2016) Civil–Military Relations in the Islamic World. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
52.
LevyY (2012) Israel’s Death Hierarchy: Casualty Aversion in a Militarized Democracy. New York: NYU Press.
53.
LevyY (2016) Control from within: how soldiers control the military. European Journal of International Relations23(1): 192–216.
54.
LichbachMI (1998) Contending theories of contentious politics and the structure-action problem of social order. Annual Review of Political Science1: 401–424.
55.
LinzJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: South America, Southern Europe, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
56.
LutterbeckD (2012) Arab uprisings, armed forces, and civil–military relations. Armed Forces and Society39(1): 28–52.
57.
LyallJWilsonI (2009) Rage against the machines: explaining outcomes in counterinsurgency wars. International Organization63(1): 67–106.
58.
MajeedMTMacDonaldR (2010) Corruption and the Military in Politics: Theory and Evidence from Around the World. Working Paper. University of Glasgow.
59.
MarinovNGoemansH (2014) Coups and democracy. British Journal of Political Science44(4): 799–825.
60.
MarshallMGJaggersKGurrTR (2017) Polity IV Project, Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2016. Vienna, VA: Center For Systemic Peace. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2015.pdf
61.
MartínezL (2000) The Algerian Civil War, 1990-1998. New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
MickolusESadlerTMurdockJet al. (2007) International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events, Data Codebook. Dunn Loring, VA: Vinyard Software.
63.
MuellerJStewartMG (2012) The terrorism delusion: America’s overwrought response to September 11. International Security37(1): 81–110.
64.
NezzarK (1999) Mémoires Du Général Khaled Nezzar. Algiers: Chihab Editions.
65.
NordhausWOnealJRRussettB (2012) The effects of the international security environment on national military expenditures: a multicountry study. International Organization66(3): 491–513.
66.
NordlingerE (1977) Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67.
OwensMT (2011) US Civil-Military Relations After 9/11: Renegotiating the Civil-Military Bargain. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: https://books.google.se/books?id=fjsEcpM3iFkC
68.
ParisH (1998) La menace terroriste et insurrectionnelle. Revue de la Défense Nationale, Paris.
69.
PearlR (2007) International terrorism: threat, policy, and response. CRS report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/RL33600.pdf
70.
PilsterUBöhmeltTTagoA (2014) The differentiation of security forces and the onset of genocidal violence. Armed Forces and Society42(1): 26–50.
71.
PinkowitzLStulzRWilliamsonR (2006) Does the contribution of corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on governance? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Finance61(6): 2725–2751.
72.
Pion-BerlinD (1992) Military autonomy and emerging democracies in South America. Comparative Politics25(1): 83–102.
73.
PiplaniVTalmadgeC (2016) When war helps civil–military relations: prolonged interstate conflict and the reduced risk of coups. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(8): 1368–1394.
74.
PowellJM (2012) Determinants of the attempting and outcome of coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution56(6): 1017–1040.
75.
PowellJMThyneCL (2011) Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: a new dataset. Journal of Peace Research48(2): 249–259.
76.
RecchiaS (2015) Reassuring the Reluctant Warriors: U.S. Civil-Military Relations and Multilateral Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
77.
RigousteM (2014) L’ennemi Intérieur: La Généalogie Coloniale et Militaire de l’ordre Sécuritaire Dans La France Contemporaine. Poches essais. Paris: La Découverte.
78.
RuffaC (2017) Military cultures and force employment in peace operations. Security Studies26(3): 391–422.
79.
SambanisN (2008) Terrorism and civil war. In: KeeferPLoayzaN (eds) Terrorism, Economic Development, and Political Openness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–206.
80.
SandlerT (2014) The analytical study of terrorism: taking stock. Journal of Peace Research51(2): 257–271.
81.
SavunBPhillipsBJ (2009). Democracy, foreign policy, and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(6): 878–904.
82.
SaxerCJ (2004) Generals and presidents: establishing civilian and democratic control in South Korea. Armed Forces and Society30(3): 383–408.
83.
ShahA (2011) Getting the military out of Pakistani politics: how aiding the army undermines democracy. Foreign Affairs90(3): 69–82.
84.
SinghN (2014) Seizing Power: The Strategic Logic of Military Coups. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
85.
StanilandP (2008) Explaining civil-military relations in complex political environments: India and Pakistan in comparative perspective. Security Studies17(2): 322–362.
86.
StepanAC (ed) (1973) Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
87.
StepanA (1978) The State and Society Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
88.
SvolikMW (2013) Contracting on violence: the moral hazard in authoritarian repression and military intervention in politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution57(5): 765–794.
89.
TalmadgeC (2015) The Dictator’s Army: Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
90.
TenenbaumE (2016) La Sentinelle égarée ? L’armée de terre face au terrorisme. Focus stratégique68.
91.
ThompsonW (1977) Toward an explanation of the Arab military coup. In: DobratzB (ed) World Perspectives in the Sociology of the Military. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
92.
TillyC (2003) The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
UlrichMPCookML (2006) US civil military relations since 9/11: issues in ethics and policy development. Journal of Military Ethics5(3): 161–182.
94.
VennessonP (2003) Civil-military relations in France: is there a gap?Journal of Strategic Studies26(2): 29–42.
95.
WagstaffD (2013) Terror Detentions and the Rule of Law: US and UK Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96.
WhitePB (2017) Crises and crisis generations: the long-term impact of international crises on military political participation. Security Studies26(4): 575–605.
97.
WilsonMCPiazzaJA (2013) Autocracies and terrorism: conditioning effects of authoritarian regime type on terrorist attacks. American Journal of Political Science57(4): 941–955.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
