This article examines the coherence of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) coordinated military strategy during the war in Afghanistan. We argue that much of this coherence can be lost when decision makers adopt multinational strategic guidance that is then interpreted by different national contingents operationally. Different strategic and military cultures across troop-contributing countries may account for observed variation in operational outcomes, but better theoretical tools are needed to examine this phenomenon. Our aim is to further scholars’ understanding of how cultural variables can affect mission outcomes. This assumed effect of strategic and military cultures is explored empirically with reference to the Canadian and German Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan, which formed part of the NATO-led ISAF operation.
AbenheimD.BiehlH. (2011). Die Bundeswehr als Freiwilligenarmee: Erfahrungen und Lehren der amerikanischen all-volunteer force [The Bundeswehr as an all-volunteer force: Experiences and lessons of the American all-volunteer force]. Strausberg, Germany: Sozialwissenschaftliche Institut der Bundeswehr.
2.
AlffC. (2008). Regionale Wiederaufbauteams als wirksame Instrumente für nation-building in Afghanistan? [Regional reconstruction teams as effective instruments for nation-building in Afghanistan?]. Geographische Rundschau, 60, 58.
3.
AuerswaldD.SaidemanS. (2014). NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting together, fighting alone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BiehlH.GiegerichB.JonasA. (Eds.) (2013). Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
BlackJ. (2011). War and the cultural turn. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
7.
BloomfieldA.NossalK. (2007). Towards an explicative understanding of strategic culture: The cases of Australia and Canada. Contemporary Security Policy, 28, 286–307.
8.
BreedeH. C. (2015). Defining success: Canada in Afghanistan 2006-2011. American Review of Canadian Studies, 44, 483–501.
9.
CapstickM. (2006). Strengthening the weak: The Canadian forces in Afghanistan. Canadian Institute of International Affairs Occasional Papers, 3, 1–9.
10.
CimbalaS. J. (2012). Civil–military relations in perspective: Strategy, structure and policy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
DeutscherBundestag. (2003). Antrag der Bundesregierung zur Fortsetzung und Erweiterung der Beteiligung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte an dem Einsatz einer Internationalen Sicherheitsunterstützungstruppe in Afghanistan auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001) vom 20. Dezember 2001, 1413 (2002) vom 23. Mai 2002, 1444 (2002) vom 27. November 2002 und 1510 (2003) vom 13. Oktober 2003 des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen[Resolution of the Federal Government for the continuation and expansion of the participation of armed German forces in the mission of an International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan on the basis of Resolutions 1386 (2001) of 20. December 2001, 1413 (2002) of 23. May 2002, 1444 (2002) of 27. November 2002 and 1510 (2003) of 13. October 2003 of the Security Council of the United Nations] (Drucksache 15/1700). Berlin, Germany: German Bundestag’s Library and Documentation Directorate (ID).
14.
DeutscherBundestag. (2004). Antrag der Bundesregierung Fortsetzung der Beteiligung bewaffneter deutscher Streitkräfte an dem Einsatz der Internationalen Sicherheitsunterstützungstruppe in Afghanistan unter Führung der NATO auf Grundlage der Resolutionen 1386 (2001) vom 20. Dezember 2001, 1413 (2002) vom 23. Mai 2002, 1444 (2002) vom 27. November 2002, 1510 (2003) vom 13. Oktober 2003 und 1563 (2004) vom 17. September 2004 des Sicherheitsrats der Vereinten Nationen [Resolution of the Federal Government for the continuation and expansion of the participation of armed German forces in the mission of an International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan on the basis of Resolutions 1386 (2001) of 20. December 2001, 1413 (2002) of 23. May 2002, 1444 (2002) of 27. November 2002, 1510 (2003) of 13. October 2003 and 1563 (2004) of 17. September 2004 of the Security Council of the United Nations]. (Drucksache 15/3710). Berlin, Germany: German Bundestag’s Library and Documentation Directorate (ID).
15.
DonA. (2005). Canadian peacekeeping: Proud tradition, strong future. Canadian Foreign Policy, 12, 7–32.
16.
EttingerA.RiceJ. (2016). Hell is other people’s schedules: Canada’s limited-term military commitments, 2001-2005. International Journal, 71, 371–392.
17.
FarrellT. (1998). Culture and military power. Review of International Studies, 24, 407–416.
18.
GammerN. (2001). From peacekeeping to peacemaking: Canada’s response to the Yugoslavia crisis. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
19.
GrayC. (1999). Strategic culture as context: The first generation of theory strikes back. Review of International Studies, 25, 49–69. Retrieved fromhttps:/www.cambridge.org/core
20.
HackeC. (1998). The national interests of the Federal Republic of Germany on the threshold of the 21st century. Aussenpolitik, 49, 5–25.
21.
HollandK. (2010). The Canadian provincial reconstruction team: The arm of development in Kandahar province. American Review of Canadian Studies, 40, 276–291.
22.
Independent Panel on Canada’s Future Role in Afghanistan. (2008). Final Report (“Manley Report”). Ottawa, Canada: The Minister of Public Works and Government Services.
23.
Jane’s Intelligence Review. (2008). Developing disorder—Divergent PRT models in Afghanistan.
24.
JohnstonA. (1995). Thinking about strategic culture. International Security, 19, 32–64.
25.
JunkJ.DaaseD. (2013). Germany. In BiehlH.GiegerichB.JonasA. (Eds.), Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent (pp. 139–152). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
26.
KierE. (1995). Culture and military doctrine: France between the wars. International Security, 19, 65–93.
LagasséP. (2016). Parliament and the war prerogative in the United Kingdom and Canada: Explaining variations in institutional change and legislative control. Parliamentary Affairs, 0, 1–21.
29.
LarsdotterK. (2008). Exploring the utility of armed force in peace operations: German and British approaches in northern Afghanistan. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 19, 352–373.
30.
LegroJ. (1996). Culture and preferences in the international cooperation two-step. American Political Science Review, 90, 118–137. doi:10.2307/2082802
31.
LeprinceC. (2013). The Canadian-led Kandhar provincial reconstruction team: A success story. International Journal, 68, 359–377.
32.
MantleL.PellerinP.DouglasT.WrightJ.DenisM. (Eds.) (2013). In their own words: Canadian stories of valour and bravery from Afghanistan, 2001-2007. Winnipeg, Canada: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
33.
NoetzelT. (2010). Germany’s small war in Afghanistan: Military learning amid politico-strategic inertia. Contemporary Security Policy, 31, 486–508.
34.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2008). ISAF’s strategic vision, Declaration by the Heads of State and Government of the Nations contributing to the UN-mandated NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8444.htm?mode=pressrelease
35.
PiiparinenT. (2007). A clash of mindsets? An insider’s account of provincial reconstruction teams. International Peacekeeping, 14, 143–157.
36.
RietjensS.BollenM. (2007). Linking provincial reconstruction teams to security enhancement in Afghanistan. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 3, 79–83.
37.
SangarE. (2015). The weight of the past(s): The impact of the Bundeswehr’s use of historical experience on strategy-making in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38, 411–444.
38.
SchröderA. (2014, December4). Afghanistan-Rückkehrer verändern die Truppe. Deutschlandfunk.
SnyderJ. (1977). The Soviet strategic culture: Implications for limited nuclear operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
41.
SteinJ.LangE. (2007). The unexpected war: Canada in Kandahar. Toronto, Canada: Penguin Group.
42.
StengelF.WellerC. (2010). Action plan or faction plan? Germany’s eclectic approach to conflict prevention. International Peacekeeping, 17, 93–107. doi:10.1080/13533311003589264
43.
TamasA. (2009). Warriors and nation builders: Development and the military in Afghanistan. Winnipeg, Canada: Canadian Defence Academy Press.
44.
U.S. Institute for Peace. (2003, January16). Civil military cooperation conference minutes. Washington, DC: US Institute for Peace.
45.
Verband Entwicklungspolitik deutscher Nichtregierungsorganisationen e.V. (2009). Fünf Jahre deutsche PRTs in Afghanistan: Eine Zwischenbilanz aus Sicht der deutschen Hilfsorganisationen [Five years of German PRTs in Afghanistan. An interim assessment from the perspective of the German aid organisations]. VENRO-Positionspapier (Vol. 1).
46.
WagnerG. (2015, February26). Keiner weiβ, wie der Landser tickt. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
47.
WernerL. (2014). The PRT Kunduz: An unsuccessful command structure. CTX, 4, 13–18.
48.
ZapfeM. (2016). Strategic culture shaping allied integration: The Bundeswehr and joint operational doctrine. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39, 246–260.
