Why do countries liberalize capital controls? The literature identifies a range of possible reasons. Yet, despite considerable advances, the impact of international non-governmental organizations has yet to be considered. In fact, surprisingly, systematic analysis of the role of international non-governmental organizations in the diffusion of economic openness, financial or otherwise, has not been pursued previously. We offer the first such analysis by advancing the idea of ‘climatic mimesis,’ which refers to the cultural climate for policymaking that results from country ties to international non-governmental organizations. International non-governmental organizations shape capital account regulation by altering the cultural climate in a country such that liberalization becomes a more problematic policy choice. Our statistical analysis of data from developing countries reveals that international non-governmental organization ties inhibited liberalization, as did relatively high public debt and concentrated domestic banking sectors. The presence of an International Monetary Fund program and liberalization by economic competitors encouraged it. We suggest that these findings have important implications for understanding the potential for convergence and divergence in an era of globalization.
AbdelalR (2007) Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AchenCH (2005) Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science22(4): 327–339.
3.
AmemiyaT (1985) Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AndrewsDM (1994) Capital mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly38(2): 193–218.
5.
ArellanoMBondS (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies58(2): 277–297.
6.
BabbSL (2001) Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BabbSL (2009) Behind the Development Banks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BanksASWilsonKA (2012) Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem: Databanks International.
9.
BeckNLKatzJ (2011) Modeling dynamics in time-series–cross-section political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science14: 331–352.
10.
BeckTClarkeGGroffA. (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
11.
BelloWBullardNMalhotraK (eds) (2000) Global Finance: New Thinking on Regulating Speculative Capital Markets. London: Zed Books.
12.
BoliJ (1999) Conclusion: World authority structures and legitimations. In: BoliJThomasG (eds) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 267–302.
13.
BoliJThomasGM (1999a) Introduction. In: BoliJThomasG (eds) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–12.
14.
BoliJThomasGM (1999b) INGOs and the organization of world culture. In: BoliJThomasG (eds) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 13–50.
15.
BoughtonJ (2012) Tearing Down Walls: The International Monetary Fund, 1990–1999. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
16.
BrooksSMKurtzMJ (2007) Capital, trade, and the political economies of reform. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 703–720.
17.
BrooksSMKurtzMJ (2012) Paths to financial policy diffusion: Statist legacies in Latin America’s globalization. International Organization65(1): 95–128.
18.
CaoX (2010) Networks of intergovernmental organizations and convergence in domestic economic policies. International Studies Quarterly53(4): 1095–1130.
19.
ChinnMDItoH (2008) A new measure of financial openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis10(3): 302–320.
20.
ChiribogaM (2002) Latin American NGOs and the IFIs: The quest for a South-determined agenda. In: ScholteASchnabelA (eds) Civil Society and Global Finance. London: Routledge, 35–50.
21.
ChwierothJ (2007a) Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International Organization61(2): 443–463.
22.
ChwierothJ (2007b) Testing and measuring the role of ideas: The case of neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund. International Studies Quarterly51(1): 5–30.
23.
ChwierothJ (2010) Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
CooleyARonJ (2002) The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security27(1): 5–39.
25.
DezalayYGarthBG (2002) The Internationalization of Palace War: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1991) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 63–82.
27.
DobbinFSimmonsBGarrettG (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?Annual Review of Sociology33: 449–472.
28.
EdwardsMS (2005) Investor responses to IMF program suspensions: Is non-compliance costly?Social Science Quarterly86(4): 857–873.
29.
EdwardsM (2010) Why ‘philanthrocapitalism’ is not the answer: Private initiatives and international development. In: KremerMVan LieshoutPWentR (eds) Doing Good or Doing Better: Development Policies in a Globalizing World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 237–254.
30.
EichengreenB (2001) Capital account liberalization: What do cross-country studies tell us?World Bank Economic Review15(3): 341–365.
31.
EvansP (2005) Counter-hegemonic globalization. In: JanoskiTAlfordRRHicksAM. (eds) The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization. New York: Cambridge University, 655–670.
32.
FinnemoreM (1996) Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization50(2): 325–348.
33.
FisherWFPonniahT (2003) Another World is Possible: Popular Alternatives to Globalization at the World Social Forum. London: Zed Books.
34.
FordhamBOMcKeownTJ (2003) Selection and influence: Interest groups and congressional voting on trade policy. International Organization57(3): 519–549.
35.
Fourcade-GourinchasMBabbSL (2002) The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Sociological Review108(3): 533–579.
36.
FrancoGNetoDMP (2004) A desregulamentação da conta de capitais: limitações macroeconômicas e regulatórias. In: Aprimorando o mercado de câmbio brasileiro. Sao Paulo: Bolsa de Mercadorias e Futuros.
37.
FrankDJMcEneaneyEH (1999) The individualization of society and the liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces77(3): 911–944.
38.
FrankDJHironakaASchoferE (2000) The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review65(1): 96–116.
39.
FranklinJC (2008) Shame on you: The impact of human rights criticism on political repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 187–211.
40.
Freedom House (1996) World Survey of Economic Freedom 1995–1996: A Freedom House Study. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
41.
FriedenJA (1991) Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization45(4): 425–451.
42.
Gale (2010) Encyclopedia of Associations: International Organizations, 49th edn.Florence: Gale Cengage Learning.
43.
GenroT (2000) Os Desafios da Tragédia [The challenges of the tragedy]. Estudos Avançados14(38): 222–234.
44.
GilardiF (2012) Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Sage, 453–477.
45.
GoldfajnIMinellaA (2007) Capital flows and controls in Brazil: What have we learned? In: EdwardsS (ed.) Capital Controls and Capital Flows in Emerging Economies: Policies, Practices and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 349–420.
46.
GreenhillB (2010) The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms. International Studies Quarterly54(1): 127–145.
47.
Hafner-BurtonE (2008) Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization62(4): 689–716.
48.
Hafner-BurtonETsutsuiK (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology110(5): 1373–1411.
49.
HeniszWBennettJZelnerA (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructural reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review70(6): 871–897.
50.
HuberEBogliacciniJ (2010) Latin America. In: CastlesFGLeibfriedSLewisJ. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 644–655.
51.
Independent Evaluation Office (2003) IMF and Recent Capital Account Crises: Indonesia, Korea, Brazil. Washington, DC: Independent Evaluation Office.
IngramPRobinsonJBuschML (2005) The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology111(3): 824–858.
54.
JäkelICSmolkaM (2013) Individual attitudes towards trade: Stolper–Samuelson revisited. Open Economies Review24(4): 731–761.
55.
KarcherSSteinbergDA (2013) Assessing the causes of capital account liberalization: How measurement matters. International Studies Quarterly57(1): 128–137.
56.
KeaneJ (2003) Global Civil Society?New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
KeckMSikkinkK (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
58.
KogutBMacphersonJM (2008) The decision to privatize: Economists and the construction of ideas and policies. In: SimmonsBDobbinFGarrettG (eds) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 104–140.
59.
KonoDY (2008) Does public opinion affect trade policy?Business and Politics10(2): Article 2. DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1224.
60.
LandmanT (2005) Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
61.
LeblangD (1997) Systemic and domestic determinants of capital controls in the developed and developing world. International Studies Quarterly41(3): 435–454.
62.
LeeC (2007) Labor unions and good governance: A cross-national comparative analysis. American Sociological Review72(4): 585–609.
63.
MaddalaGS (1983) Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MeyerJWBoliJThomasGM. (1997) World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology103(1): 144–181.
65.
MilaniCRSLaniadoRN (2007) Transnational social movements and the globalization agenda: A methodological approach based on the analysis of the World Social Forum. Brazilian Political Science Review1(2): 10–39.
66.
MizruchiMSFeinL (1999) The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly44(4): 653–683.
67.
ModyASaraviaD (2003) Catalyzing Capital Flows: Do IMF-Supported Programs Work as Commitment Devices? IMF Working Paper 03/100. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
68.
MukherjeeBSingerDA (2010) International institutions and domestic compensation: The IMF and the politics of capital account liberalization. American Journal of Political Science54(1): 45–60.
69.
MukherjeeBYadavVBéjarS (2013) Electoral particularism, bank concentration, and capital account liberalization in developing democracies. Comparative Political Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488551.
70.
MurdieA (2009) Signals without Borders: The Conditional Impact of INGOs. PhD Thesis, Emory University, USA.
71.
MurdieADavisDR (2012) Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 1–16.
72.
MurdieAHicksA (2013) Do international NGOs boost government services? The case of health. International Organization67(3): 541–573.
73.
NeumayerE (2005) Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights?Journal of Conflict Resolution49(6): 925–953.
74.
PeckJ (2004) Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography28(3): 392–405.
75.
PepinskyT (2013) The domestic politics of financial internationalization in the developing world. Review of International Political Economy20(4): 848–880.
76.
PolilloSGuillénMF (2005) Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology110(6): 1764–1802.
77.
PorterT (2005) Globalization and Finance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
78.
PowellF (2007) The Politics of Civil Society: Neoliberalism or Social Left?Bristol: Polity Press.
79.
PriceR (2003) Transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics. World Politics55(4): 579–606.
80.
QuinnDPInclánC (1997) The origins of financial openness: A study of current and capital account liberalization. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 771–813.
81.
QuinnDPToyodaAM (2007) Ideology and voter preferences as determinants of financial globalization. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 344–363.
82.
QuinnDPSchindlerMToyodaAM (2011) Assessing measures of financial openness and integration. IMF Economic Review59(3): 488–522.
RisseTRoppSC (1999) International human rights norms and domestic change. In: RisseTRoppSCSikkinkK (eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 234–278.
85.
RodrikD (1995) Political economy of trade policy. In: GrossmanGMRogoffK (eds) Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1457–1494.
86.
SchoferELonghoferW (2011) The structural sources of association. American Journal of Sociology117(2): 539–585.
87.
SchrankAKurtzMJ (2005) Credit where credit is due: Open economy industrial policy and export diversification in Latin America and the Caribbean. Politics and Society33(4): 671–702.
88.
SimmonsBAElkinsZ (2004) The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review98(1): 171–189.
89.
SimmonsBADobbinFGarrettG (2008) Introduction: The diffusion of liberalism. In: SimmonsBADobbinFGarrettG (eds) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–63.
90.
SmithJWiestD (2011) Social Movements in the World System: The Politics of Crisis and Transformation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
91.
SmithJWiestD (2012) Transnational Social Movement Organization Dataset, 1953–2003. ICPSR33863-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), 2012–07–16. DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR33863.v1.
92.
SolingenE (2012) Of dominoes and firewalls: The domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion. International Studies Quarterly56(4): 631–644.
93.
TomzM (2012) International finance. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Sage, 692–719.
94.
UIA (Union of International Associations) (2008–2009) Yearbook of International Organizations (45 edn, Vols 1–4). Union of International Associations.
95.
VreelandJR (2003) The IMF and Economic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
96.
WeylandK (2007) Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
97.
WoodsN (2006) The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
98.
World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
99.
ZornC (2001) Generalizing estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science45(2): 470–490.
