Unlike other articles on the International Criminal Court (ICC) that focus on the
question of the court’s future effectiveness, this article seeks to
explain the creation of the court and its institutional design as established in its
statute. It applies theoretical arguments from the rationalist and constructivist
literature on international institutions to the ICC case; and demonstrates how both
theoretical perspectives can be combined in different ways. The ICC’s
establishment can be explained with rationalist arguments focusing on cooperation
problems and transaction cost, yet a constructivist view can
‘deepen’ the argument by explaining the perception of problems,
and provide an alternative argument focusing on legitimacy concerns. Regarding
institutional design, rationalist theory helps identify a tradeoff between a weak
court backed by the US and a strong court without US support; a complementary
constructivist approach can explain why states opted for the latter.
Abbott, Kenneth W.
(1999)
‘International Relations Theory, International Law, and the
Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts’
, The American Journal of International Law93(2):
361-379
.
2.
Abbott, Kenneth W.
and
Duncan Snidal
(2000)
‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’
, International Organization54(3):
421-456
.
3.
Amnesty International
(2001) Universal Jurisdiction: The Duty of States to Enact
and Enforce Legislation (Legal Memorandum). URL:
http://web.amnesty.org/web/web.nsf/pages/int_jus_uj_legal_memorandum
(accessed 02/02/2004).
4.
Arbour, Louise
(1999) Introductory Statement by Justice Louise Arbour,
Prosecutor ICTY and ICTR at the Launch of the ICC Coalition’s Global
Ratification Campaign (13 May 1999),
The Hague Appeal for Peace, ICTY Press
Release. URL: http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/p401-e.htm
(accessed: 02/02/2004).
5.
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.
(1999)
‘The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’
, The American Journal of International Law93(12):
22-43
.
6.
Ball, Howard
(1999) Prosecuting War Crimes and Genocide: The
Twentieth-Century Experience.
Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
.
7.
Bass, Gary Jonathan
(2000) Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crime
Tribunals.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
.
8.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif
(ed.) (1999) International Criminal Law, 2nd edn.New York: Transnational Publishers
.
9.
Bazelaire, Jean-Paul
and
Thierry Cretin
(2000) La justice pénale internationale. Son
evolution, son avenir, de Nuremberg à la Haye.
Paris: Presses Universitaries de France
.
10.
Beigbeder, Yves
(1999) Judging War Criminals. The Politics of International
Justice.
Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave
.
11.
Berger, Thomas U.
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security
in Germany and Japan’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp.
317-356.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
12.
Boli, John
(1987) ‘Human Rights or State Expansion?
Cross-National Definitions of Constitutional Rights’, in
George M. Thomas,John W. Meyer,Francisco O. Ramirez
and
John Boli
(eds) Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society and
Individual, pp. 133-149.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
13.
Bolton, John R.
(2001)
‘The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court
from America’s Perspective’
, Law and Contemporary Problems64(1):
167-180
.
14.
Brody, Reed
(2001)
‘The Prosecution of Hissene Habre. An “African Pinochet”’
, New England Law Review35:
321-335
.
15.
Cassese, Antonio
(1999)
‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some
Preliminary Reflections’
, European Journal of International Law10(1):
144-171
.
16.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.
(1998)
‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’
, World Politics50(2):
324-328
.
17.
CICC (Coalition for the International Criminal Court)
(2003a) US Bilateral Immunity or So-called ‘Art.
98’ Agreements. URL:
http://www.iccnow.org/documents/usandtheicc.html (accessed: 02/02/2004).
18.
CICC (Coalition for the International Criminal Court)
(2003b) CICC Background. URL: http://www.iccnow.org/introduction/ciccbackground.html.
19.
Cohen, Laurie A.
(1997)
‘Application of the Realist and Liberal Perspectives to the
Implementation of War Crime Trials: Case Studies of Nuremberg and Bosnia’
, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs2(1):
113-170
.
20.
Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign
(2000) Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee
Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia. URL: http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/nato061300.htm
(accessed 02/02/2004).
21.
Congressional Research Service
(2002) US Policy Regarding the International Criminal
Court, Report for Congress. URL:
http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/13389.pdf (accessed 02/02/2004).
22.
Cooper, Andrew F.
(2002) ‘Like-minded Nations, NGOs, and the
Changing Pattern of Diplomacy Within the UN System: An Introductory
Perspective’, in
Andrew F. Cooper,John English
and
Ramesh Thakur
(eds) Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?, pp.
1-18.
Tokyo, New York and Paris: United Nations
University Press
.
23.
Cooper, Andrew F.
,
John English
and
Ramesh Thakur
(eds) (2002) Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?Tokyo, New York and Paris: United Nations
University Press
.
24.
Crawford, James
(1995)
‘The ILC Adopts a Statute for an International Criminal Court’
, The American Journal of International Law89(2):
404-416
.
25.
Davenport, David
(2002/03)
‘The New Diplomacy’
, Policy Review116:
17-30
.
26.
Edgar, Alistair D.
(2002) ‘Peace, Justice, and Politics: The
International Criminal Court, “New Diplomacy” and the UN
System’, in
Andrew F. Cooper,John English
and
Ramesh Thakur
(eds) Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?, pp.
133-151.
Tokyo, New York and Paris: United Nations
University Press
.
27.
El Zeidy, Mohamed
(2002)
‘The United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb on Article 16 of the
ICC Statute: Security Council Power of Deferrals and Resolution 1422’
, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law35(5):
1503-1544
.
28.
Farer, Tom J.
(2000)
‘Restraining the Barbarians: Can International Criminal Law Help?’
, Human Rights Quarterly22(1):
90-117
.
29.
Fearon, James D.
and
Alexander Wendt
(2002) ‘Rationalism vs. Constructivism: A
Skeptical View’, in
Walter Carlsnaes,Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
52-72.
London: Sage
.
30.
Ferencz, Benjamin B.
(1998) From Nuremberg to Rome. Toward an International
Criminal Court.
Bonn: Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden
(Policy Paper no. 8).
31.
Finnemore, Martha
(1993)
‘International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United
Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy’
, International Organization47(4):
565-597
.
32.
Finnemore, Martha
(1996)
‘Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights From
Sociology’s Institutionalism’
, International Organization50(2):
325-347
.
33.
Finnemore, Martha
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(1998)
‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’
, International Organization52(4),
887-917
.
34.
Gallarotti, Giulio
and
Arik Y. Preis
(1999)
‘Toward Universal Human Rights and the Rule of Law: The Permanent
International Criminal Court’
, Australian Journal of International Affairs53(1):
95-111
.
35.
Grewe, Wilhelm G.
(ed.) (1992) Fontes Historiae Iuris Gentium, Vol. 3/2
(1815-1945).
Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter
.
36.
Griffin, John B.
(2001)
‘A Predictive Framework for the Effectiveness of International
Criminal Tribunals’
, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law34(2):
406-455
.
37.
Guardian
(2001)
‘Justice in the Balkans: Hague Tribunal Sets a Valuable Precedent’
, The Guardian (6 August), anonymous.
38.
Guzzini, Stefano
(2000)
‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’
, European Journal of International Affairs6(2):
147-182
.
39.
Hebel, Herman A.M. von
(1999) ‘An International Criminal Court
— A Historical Perspective’, in
Herman A.M. von Hebel
,
Johan G. Lammers
and
Jolien Schukking
(eds) Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour
of Adriaan Bos, pp. 13-38.
The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press;
Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International
.
40.
Human Rights Watch
(2003) Belgium: Anti-Atrocity Law Limited, 5 April.
URL: http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/04/belgium040503.htm (accessed 02/02/2004).
41.
ICTY Appeals Chamber
(1995)
‘The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Case No. IT-94-AR72, Decision on
the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, October 2, 1995’
, Human Rights Law Journal16:
439-444
.
42.
IMT (International Military Tribunal)
(1945)
‘The Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of Major War
Criminals of the European Axis, Charter of the International Military
Tribunal, August 8, 1945’
, American Journal of International Law39(4, Supplement):
257-264
.
43.
Kamminga, Menno T.
(2000) Final Report on the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction
in Respect of Gross Human Rights Offences,
Committee on International Human Rights Law and Practice.
International Law Association (ILA), London Conference
.
44.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
(1997) Tamed Power: Germany in Europe.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
45.
Keck, Margaret E.
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(1998) Activists Beyond Borders.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
46.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
.
47.
Kier, Elizabeth
(1997) Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine
Between the Wars.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
.
48.
Kindleberger, Charles P.
(1986)
‘International Public Goods without International Government’
, American Economic Review76(1):
1-13
.
49.
Kirsch, Philippe
(1999) ‘Introduction’, in
Herman A.M. von Hebel
,
Johan G. Lammers
and
Jolien Schukking
(eds) Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour
of Adriaan Bos, pp. 1-10.
The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press,
Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International
.
50.
Kirsch, Philippe
and
John T. Holmes
(1998)
‘The Birth of the Permanent International Criminal Court: The
1998 Rome Conference’
, Canadian Yearbook of International Law36:
3-39
.
51.
Kirsch, Philippe
and
John T. Holmes
(1999)
‘The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The
Negotiating Process’
, American Journal of International Law93(1):
2-12
.
52.
Kissinger, Henry A.
(2001)
‘The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction’
, Foreign Affairs80(4):
86-96
.
53.
Kittichaisaree, Kriangsak
(2001) International Criminal Law.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
54.
Koremenos, Barbara,Charles Lipson
and
Duncan Snidal
(2001)
‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’
, International Organization55(4):
761-800
.
55.
Krasner, Stephen
(1976)
‘State Power and the Structure of International Trade’
, World Politics28(3):
317-347
.
56.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
(2000)
‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s
“Social Theory of International Politics” and the
Constructivist Challenge’
, Millennium: Journal of International Studies29(1):
73-101
.
57.
Lee, Roy S.
(1999) ‘Creating an International Criminal Court
— of Procedures and Compromises’, in
Herman A.M. von Hebel
,
Johan G. Lammers
and
Jolien Schukking
(eds) Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour
of Adriaan Bos, pp. 141-152.
The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press;
Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International
.
58.
Lietzau, William K.
(2001)
‘International Criminal Law After Rome: Concerns From a US
Military Perspective’
, Law and Contemporary Problems64:
119-140
.
59.
Lutz, Ellen
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(2000)
‘International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America’
, International Organization54(3):
633-659
.
60.
March, James J.
and
Johan P. Olsen
(1998)
‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’
, International Organization52(4):
943-970
.
61.
Mayerfeld, Jamie
(2003)
‘Who Shall Be the Judge? The United States, the International
Criminal Court, and the Global Enforcement of Human Rights’
, Human Rights Quarterly25(1):
93-129
.
62.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1997)
‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’
, International Organization51(4):
513-553
.
63.
Morton, Jeffrey S.
(2000) The International Law Commission of the UN.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
64.
Neier, Aryeh
(1998) War Crimes.
New York: Times Books
.
65.
Nel, Philip
(2002) ‘Between Counter-Hegemony and
Post-Hegemony: The Rome Statute and Normative Innovation in World
Politics’, in
Andrew F. Cooper,John English
and
Ramesh Thakur
(eds) Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?, pp.
152-161.
Tokyo, New York and Paris: United Nations
University Press
.
66.
New York Times
(2003)
‘Belgium Scales Back Its War Crimes Law Under US Pressure’
, The New York Times (2 August), anonymous.
67.
O’Shea, Sheila
(1995/96)
‘Interaction Between International Criminal Tribunals and
National Legal Systems’
, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics28(1-2):
367-434
.
68.
Oye, Kenneth A.
(1985)
‘Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies’
, World Politics38(1):
1-24
.
69.
Pace, William R.
(1999) ‘The Relationship between the
International Criminal Court and Non-Governmental
Organizations’, in
Herman A.M. von Hebel
,
Johan G. Lammers
and
Jolien Schukking
(eds) Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour
of Adriaan Bos, pp. 189-211.
The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press;
Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International
.
70.
Pejic, Jelena
(1998)
‘Creating a Permanent International Criminal Court: The Obstacles
to Independence and Effectiveness’
, Columbia Human Rights Law Review29:
291-354
.
71.
Pejic, Jelena
(2002)
‘Accountability for International Crimes: From Conjecture to Reality’
, International Review of the Red Cross845:
13-33
.
72.
Peskin, Victor
(2000)
‘Conflicts of Justice — An Analysis of the Role of the
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’
, International Peacekeeping6(4-6):
128-137
.
73.
Popovski, Vesselin
(2000)
‘International Criminal Court: A Necessary Step Towards Global Justice’
, Security Dialogue31(4):
405-419
.
74.
Randall, Kenneth C.
(1988)
‘Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law’
, Texas Law Review66:
785-841
.
75.
Risse, Thomas
(2002) ‘Transnational Actors and World
Politics’, in
Walter Carlsnaes,Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
255-274.
London: Sage
.
76.
Risse, Thomas
(2003) ‘Konstruktivismus, Rationalismus und
Theorien Internationaler Beziehungen — warum empirisch nichts so
heiß gegessen wird, wie es theoretisch gekocht
wurde’, in
Gunther Hellmann,Klaus Dieter Wolf
and
Michael Zürn
(eds) Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und
Perspektiven in Deutschland, pp. 99-132.
Baden-Baden: Nomos
.
77.
Risse, Thomas
and
Stephen C. Ropp
(1999) ‘International Human Rights Norms and
Domestic Change: Conclusions’, in
Thomas Risse,Stephen C. Ropp
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic
Change, pp. 234-278.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
78.
Risse, Thomas
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(1999) ‘The Socialization of International Human
Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction’, in
Thomas Risse,Stephen C. Ropp
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic
Change, pp. 1-38.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
79.
Risse, Thomas,Stephen C. Ropp
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(eds) (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms
and Domestic Change.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
80.
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi
(2001)
‘The Pinochet Precedent and Universal Jurisdiction’
, New England Law Review35:
311-319
.
81.
Rome Statute
(1998) Rome Statute of the International Criminal
Court. URL: http://www.un.org/law/icc/.
82.
Roth, Kenneth
(1999) ‘Speech One: Endorse the International
Criminal Court’, in
Alton Frye
(ed.) Toward an International Criminal Court? Three Options Presented as
Presidential Speeches, pp. 19-36.
New York: Council on Foreign Relations
.
83.
Roth, Kenneth
(2001)
‘The Case for Universal Jurisdiction’
, Foreign Affairs80(5):
150-154
.
84.
Rubin, Alfred P.
(2000)
‘Some Objections to the International Criminal Court’
, Peace Review12(1):
45-50
.
85.
Rudolph, Christopher
(2001)
‘Constructing an Atrocities Regime: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals’
, International Organization55(3):
655-691
.
86.
Ruggie, John Gerard
(1982)
‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded
Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order’
, International Organization36(2):
379-415
.
87.
Sadat, Leila Nadya
(2002) The International Criminal Court and the
Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium.
New York: Transnational Publishers
.
88.
Scharf, Michael P.
(1999) ‘The Politics Behind the US Opposition to
the International Criminal Court’, New England
International and Comparative Law Annual 5. URL:
http://www.nesl.edu/intljournal/vol5/scharf.htm (accessed 02/02/2004).
89.
Scharf, Michael P.
(2001)
‘Application of Treaty-Based Universal Jurisdiction to Nationals
of Non-Party States’
, New England Law Review35:
363-382
.
90.
Scheffer, David J.
(1999)
‘The United States and the International Criminal Court’
, The American Journal of International Law93(12):
12-22
.
91.
Scheffer, David J.
(2002)
‘Staying the Course with the International Criminal Court’
, Cornell International Law Journal35:
47-100
.
92.
Sewall, Sarah
and
Carl Kaysen
(2000) The United States and the International Criminal
Court. URL: http://www.amacad.org/projects/iccarticle.htm (accessed 02/02/2004).
93.
Shepard, William S.
(2000)
‘Restraining Gulliver: American Exceptionalism and the
International Criminal Court’
, Mediterranean Quarterly11(1):
55-74
.
94.
Sherman, Antonia
(1996)
‘Sympathy for the Devil: Examining a Defendant’s Right
to Confront Before the International War Crimes Tribunal’
, Emory International Law Review10:
833-878
.
95.
Simmons, Beth A.
and
Lisa L. Martin
(2002) ‘International Organizations and
Institutions’, in
Walter Carlsnaes,Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
192-211.
London: Sage
.
96.
Skodvin Hegdal, Tora
(1992)
‘“Structure” and “Agent”
in Institutional Bargaining: Design and Political Leadership in the Third
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea’
, Cooperation and Conflict27(2):
163-191
.
97.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie
(1999) ‘Memorandum to the
President’, in
Alton Frye
(ed.) Toward an International Criminal Court? Three Options Presented as
Presidential Speeches, pp. 1-18.
New York: Council on Foreign Relations
.
98.
Smidt, Michael L.
(2001)
‘The International Criminal Court: An Effective Means of Deterrence?’
, Military Law Review167:
156-240
.
99.
Smith, Thomas W.
(2002)
‘Moral Hazard and Humanitarian Law: The International Criminal
Court and the Limits of Legalism’
, International Politics39:
175-192
.
100.
Snidal, Duncan
(1997) ‘International Political Economy
Approaches to International Institutions’, in
Jagdeep S. Bhandari
and
Alan O. Sykes
(eds) Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and
Empirical Perspectives, pp. 477-512.
Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press
.
101.
Teitelbaum, Alejandro
(1999)
‘Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Critique’
, Social Justice26(4):
107-114
.
102.
Thornberry, Cedric
(1996)
‘Saving the War Crimes Tribunal’
, Foreign Policy104:
72-85
.
103.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
(2003) Status of Ratifications of the Principal International
Human Rights Treaties, as of 2 November 2003. URL:
http://www.unhchr.ch/pdf/report.pdf (accessed 02/02/2004).
104.
Van Den Wyngaert, Christine
(2000) International Criminal Law: A Collection of
International and European Instruments.
The Hague: Kluwer Law International
.
Wendt, Alexander
(2001)
‘Driving With the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of
Institutional Design’
, International Organization55(4):
1021-1053
.
107.
Young, Oran R.
(1989)
‘The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural
Resources and the Environment’
, International Organization43(3):
349-375
.
108.
Young, Oran R.
(1991)
‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of
Institutions in International Society’
, International Organization45(3):
281-308
.
109.
Young, Oran R.
(1994) International Governance. Protecting the Environment
in a Stateless Society.
Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press
.
