Using the logic of a two-phase cooperation framework (first bargaining to reach an agreement, then enforcement of the negotiated agreement), this article examines how the risk of institutional breakdown can help promote international cooperation. I argue first that the risk of institutional breakdown can help promote bargaining cooperation by raising the opportunity costs of bargaining failure, thus providing a strong incentive for states who value the fragile international institution to negotiate a cooperative agreement. Having helped states to reach a cooperative bargain, the risk of institutional breakdown can also play a role in the subsequent enforcement phase. I argue second that the risk of valued institutional breakdown can reduce state preferences for defection, moving the enforcement problem away from the standard Prisoners' Dilemma structure. To illustrate these arguments, I examine the European Community's decision to recognize the breakaway Yugoslav republics of Croatia and Slovenia.
Agence France Presse (1991) `France Supports EC Recognition for Croatia, Slovenia', 5 December.
2.
Aggarwal, V.K.
(1998) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Axelrod, R.
(1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Axelrod, R.
and R. Keohane (1985) `Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions', World Politics38: 226-254.
5.
Crawford, B.
(1996) `Explaining Defection from International Cooperation: Germany's Unilateral Recognition of Croatia', World Politics48: 482-521.
6.
Crawford, B.
(1998) `An Empty Nest? Reconciling European Security Institutions in the Bosnian Crisis', in V.K. Aggarwal (ed.) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
Downs, G.W.
and D.M. Rocke (1995) Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Eckstein, H.
(1975) `Case Study and Theory in Political Science', in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Economist (1992b) `Countdown to Recognition', 3 January: 57.
11.
Economist (1992c) `Hail, Croatia', 3 January: 10.
12.
Economist (1991) `The Deal is Done', 14 December: 51-53.
13.
Fearon, J.D.
(1998) `Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation', International Organization52: 269-305.
14.
Garrett, G.
(1992) `International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market', International Organization46: 533-560.
15.
Garrett, G.
and B.R. Weingast (1993) `Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market', in J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane (eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Glenny, M.
(1991) `Germany Fans the Flames of War', New Statesman & Society, 20 and 27 December.
17.
Glenny, M.
(1993) The Fall of Yugoslavia: The Third Balkan War. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
18.
Gordon, P.H.
(1997/98) `Europe's Uncommon Foreign Policy', International Security22: 74-100.
19.
Haggard, S.
and B.A. Simmons. (1987) `Theories of International Regimes', International Organization41: 429-517.
20.
Hansenclever, A.
, P. Mayer and V. Rittberger (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hill, C.
(1997) `The Actors Involved: National Perspectives', in E. Regelsberger et al. (eds) Foreign Policy of the European Union: From EPC to CFSP and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
22.
Ikenberry, G.J.
(1993) `Salvaging the G-7', Foreign Affairs72: 132-139.
23.
Jakobsen, P.V.
(1995) `Multilateralism Matters, But How? The Impact of Multilateralism on Great Power Policy towards the Break-up of Yugoslavia', Cooperation and Conflict30: 365-398.
24.
Jorgensen, K.E.
(1993) `The European Community and Eastern Europe', in O. Norgaard et al. (eds) The European Community in World Politics. London: Pinter Publishers.
25.
Katzenstein, P.J.
(1997) Tamed Power: Germany in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Keohane, R.O.
(1983) `The Demand for International Regimes', in S. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Keohane, R.O.
(1984) After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Kinzer, S.
(1991) `Slovenia and Croatia Get Bonn's Nod', New York Times, 24 December: A3.
29.
Koremenos, B.
(2001) `Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility', International Organization55: 289-325.
30.
Krasner, S.D.
(1991) `Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier', World Politics43: 336-366.
31.
LaFranchi, H.
(1991a) `Europeans Move Toward Consensus on Yugoslavia', Christian Science Monitor, 4 December.
32.
LaFranchi, H.
(1991b) `Europeans Tighten Political Ranks', Christian Science Monitor, 19 December.
33.
Le Gloannec, A.
(1992) `The Implications of German Unification for Western Europe', in P. Stares (ed.) The New Germany and the New Europe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34.
Libal, M.
(1997) Limits of Persuasion: Germany and the Yugoslav Crisis, 1991-1992. Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
Mansfield, E.D.
(1998) `The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Arrangements', Journal of Conflict Resolution42: 523-543.
36.
Mansfield, E.D.
, J.C. Pevehouse and D.H. Bearce (1999/2000) `Preferential Trading Arrangements and Military Disputes', Security Studies9: 92-118.
37.
Martin, L.L.
(1992a) `Interests, Power and Multilateralism', International Organization46: 765-792.
38.
Martin, L. L.
(1992b) `Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions During the Falkland Islands Conflict', International Security16: 143-178.
39.
Martin, L.L.
and B. Simmons (1998) `Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions', International Organization52: 729-758.
40.
Mearsheimer, J.J.
(1990) `Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War', International Security15: 5-56.
41.
Mearsheimer, J.J.
(1994/95) `The False Promise of International Institutions', International Security19: 5-49.
42.
Milner, H.
(1992) `International Theories of Cooperation among Nations', World Politics44: 466-496.
43.
Morrow, J.D.
(1994) `Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information', International Organization48: 387-423.
44.
Newhouse, J.
(1992) `The Diplomatic Round: Dodging the Problem', New Yorker24 August.
45.
Oneal, J.R.
and B. Russett (1999) `The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992', World Politics52: 1-37.
46.
Oye, K.A.
(1986) Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Palmer, J.
(1991) `EC agrees on Yugoslavia Compromise', The Guardian (London), 17 December.
48.
Peel, Q.
(1992) `Damned if it Does — and if it Doesn't', Financial Times, 18/19 January: 6.
49.
Perry, M.
and P. Reny (1993) `A Non-Cooperative Bargaining Model with Strategically Timed Offers', Journal of Economic Theory59: 50-77.
50.
Peterson, N.
(1993) `The European Union and Foreign and Security Policy', in O. Norgaard et al. (eds) The European Community in World Politics. London: Pinter Publishers.
51.
Pomfret, R.
(1997) The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Powell, R.
(1993) `Guns, Butter, and Anarchy', American Political Science Review87: 115-132.
53.
Putnam, R.
(1988) `Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games', International Organization42: 427-460.
54.
Riding, A.
(1991) `European Nations Declare Sanctions Against Belgrade', New York Times, 9 November: A1, A6.
55.
Rosendorff, B.P.
and H.V. Milner (2001) `The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape', International Organization55: 829-857.
56.
Ross, G.
(1995) Jacques Delors and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
Rubenstein, A.
(1982) `Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model', Econometrica50: 97-100.
58.
Russett, B.
, J.R. Oneal and D.R. Davis (1998) `The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85', International Organization52: 441-467.
59.
Salmon, T.C.
(1992) `Testing Times for European Political Cooperation: The Gulf and Yugoslavia, 1990-1992', International Affairs68: 233-253.
60.
Sandholtz, W.
(1993) `Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht', International Organization47: 1-39.
61.
Singer, D.
(1992) `Germany Muscles In', Nation, 3 February.
62.
Skaperdas, S.
and C. Syropoulos (1996) `Can the Shadow of the Future Harm Cooperation?', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization29: 355-372.
63.
Tagliabue, J.
(1991) `Bold New Germany: No Longer a Political Dwarf', New York Times, 16 December: A12.
64.
Unger, D.C.
(1993) `Germany is Not to Blame for Bosnia', New York Times, 7 June: A16.
65.
Vernet, D.
(1992) `The Dilemma of French Foreign Policy', International Affairs68: 655-664.
66.
Waltz, K.N.
(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
67.
Woodward, S.L.
(1995) Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
68.
World Trade Organization
(1995) Regionalism and the World Trading System. Geneva: WTO.
69.
Young, O.R.
(1983) `Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes', in S. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
