Hand functioning in progressive multiple sclerosis improves with tDCS added to daily exercises: A home-based randomized,double-blinded,sham-controlled clinical trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2024
Hand functioning in progressive multiple sclerosis improves with tDCS added to daily exercises: A home-based randomized,double-blinded,sham-controlled clinical trial
Many individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are challenged by reduced manual dexterity and limited rehabilitation options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during motor training can improve rehabilitation outcomes. We developed a protocol for remotely supervising tDCS to deliver sessions of stimulation paired with training at home.
Objective:
This study evaluated the effectiveness of at-home tDCS paired with manual dexterity training for individuals with PMS.
Methods:
Sixty-five right-hand dominant participants with PMS and hand impairment were randomized to receive either active or sham M1-SO tDCS paired with manual dexterity training over 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes were measured by the changes in Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) and Dellon-Modified-Moberg-Pick-Up Test (DMMPUT).
Results:
The intervention had high rates of adherence and completion (98% of participants completed at least 18 of 20 sessions). The active tDCS group demonstrated significant improvement for the left hand compared with baseline in 9-HPT (−5.85 ± 6.19 vs −4.23 ± 4.34, p = 0.049) and DMMPUT (−10.62 ± 8.46 vs −8.97 ± 6.18, p = 0.049). The active tDCS group reported improvements in multiple sclerosis (MS)-related quality of life (mean increase: 5.93 ± 13.04 vs −0.05 ± −8.27; p = 0.04).
Conclusion:
At-home tDCS paired with manual dexterity training is effective for individuals with PMS, with M1-SO tDCS enhancing training outcomes and offering a promising intervention for improving and preserving hand dexterity.
NewsomeSDVon GeldernGShouH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of hand function in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2019; 32: 107–113.
2.
JohanssonSYtterbergCClaessonIM, et al. High concurrent presence of disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol2007; 254(6): 767–773.
3.
KisterIBaconTEChamotE, et al. Natural history of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Int J MS Care2013; 15(3): 146–156.
4.
SpoorenAITimmermansAASeelenHA. Motor training programs of arm and hand in patients with MS according to different levels of the ICF: A systematic review. BMC Neurol2012; 12(1): 49.
5.
HolperLCoenenMWeiseA, et al. Characterization of functioning in multiple sclerosis using the ICF. J Neurol2010; 257(1): 103–113.
6.
ZackowskiKMFreemanJBrichettoG, et al. Prioritizing progressive MS rehabilitation research: A call from the International Progressive MS Alliance. Mult Scler2021; 27(7): 989–1001.
7.
PéranPNemmiFDutilleulC, et al. Neuroplasticity and brain reorganization associated with positive outcomes of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in progressive multiple sclerosis: A fMRI study. Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 42: 102127.
8.
BoffaGTacchinoASbragiaE, et al. Preserved brain functional plasticity after upper limb task-oriented rehabilitation in progressive multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol2020; 27(1): 77–84.
9.
NitscheMAPaulusW. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol2000; 527(Pt. 3): 633–639.
10.
Monte-SilvaKKuoMFHessenthalerS, et al. Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul2013; 6(3): 424–432.
11.
KronbergGRahmanASharmaM, et al. Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro. Brain Stimul2020; 13(2): 287–301.
12.
Nombela-CabreraRPérez-NombelaSAvendaño-CoyJ, et al. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil2023; 20(1): 142.
13.
PilloniGChoiCShawM, et al. Walking in multiple sclerosis improves following aerobic exercise paired with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial. Ann Clin Transl Neurol2020; 7: 2310–2319.
14.
CharvetLEShawMTBiksonM, et al. Supervised transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul2020; 13(3): 686–693.
15.
PilloniGVogel-EynyALustbergM, et al. Tolerability and feasibility of at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS): Single-center evidence from 6,779 sessions. Brain Stimul2022; 15(3): 707–716.
16.
ShawMTBestPFrontarioA, et al. Telerehabilitation benefits patients with multiple sclerosis in an urban setting. J Telemed Telecare2019; 27: 39–45.
17.
KammCPMattleHPMüriRM, et al. Home-based training to improve manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler2015; 21(12): 1546–1556.
18.
Raj KumarABilalogluSRaghavanP, et al. Grasp rehabilitator: A mechatronic approach. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DMD2019-3242 (2019, accessed 5 February 2024).
19.
LuYBilalogluSAluruV, et al. Quantifying feedforward control: A linear scaling model for fingertip forces and object weight. J Neurophysiol2015; 114(1): 411–418.
20.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33(11): 1444–1452.
21.
GoodkinDEHertsgaardDSeminaryJ. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: Improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1988; 69(10): 850–854.
22.
SnelbakerAJWilkinsonGSRobertsonGJ, et al. Wide range achievement test 3 (WRAT3). In: DorfmanWIHersenM (eds) Understanding Psychological Assessment. Boston, MA: Springer, 2001, pp. 259–274.
23.
StroberLBBruceJMArnettPA, et al. A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test –Oral version. Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 43: 102154.
24.
FeysPLamersIFrancisG, et al. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2017; 23(5): 711–720.
25.
AmirjaniNAshworthNLOlsonJL, et al. Discriminative validity and test–retest reliability of the Dellon-modified Moberg pick-up test in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst2011; 16(1): 51–58.
26.
MathiowetzVWeberKKashmanN, et al. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res1985; 5(1): 24–38.
27.
AmirjaniNAshworthNLGordonT, et al. Normative values and the effects of age, gender, and handedness on the Moberg Pick-Up Test. Muscle Nerve2007; 35(6): 788–792.
28.
DellonESMoureyRDellonAL. Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. Plast Reconstr Surg1992; 90(1): 112–117.
29.
MathiowetzVKashmanNVollandG, et al. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66(2): 69–74.
30.
PolmanCHRudickRA. The multiple sclerosis functional composite: A clinically meaningful measure of disability. Neurology2010; 74(Suppl. 3): S8–S15.
31.
SebastiãoESandroffBMLearmonthYC, et al. Validity of the timed up and go test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2016; 97(7): 1072–1077.
32.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol1988; 54(6): 1063–1070.
33.
VickreyBGHaysRDHarooniR, et al. A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res1995; 4(3): 187–206.
34.
ParlowSEKinsbourneM. Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain Cogn1989; 11(1): 98–113.
35.
KaminskiEMaudrichTBasslerP, et al. tDCS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the trained hand enhances cross-limb transfer in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 935781.
36.
BoggioPSCastroLOSavagimEA, et al. Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett2006; 404(1): 232–236.
37.
RiddingMCFlavelSC. Induction of plasticity in the dominant and non-dominant motor cortices of humans. Exp Brain Res2006; 171(4): 551–557.
38.
HarrisJEEngJJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the non-dominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2006; 20(3): 380–389.
39.
ShiraniAOkudaDT. Handedness and potential implications for neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 37: 101405.
