Urban schools located along arterial roads face significant challenges from traffic-induced noise intrusion, which compromises classroom acoustic quality and student learning. This study examines how multiple architectural and site parameters influence the transmission of noise from outdoor to indoor environments through a comparative field investigation of two naturally ventilated schools in Nagpur, India. Forty unoccupied classrooms were assessed under both open- and closed-window conditions. Classrooms situated closer to the road, oriented parallel to traffic, and located below street level recorded the highest indoor noise levels (up to 70.1 dB(A)), frequently exceeding the National Building Code (NBC, 2016) guideline of 40–45 dB(A). Findings indicate that the wall opening-to-floor ratio (WOFR) alone was not found to be a reliable predictor of acoustic performance; rather, orientation, elevation, and setback interactively govern the degree of noise intrusion. Statistical modelling showed that distance and orientation were significant predictors of indoor noise levels due to traffic (p < 0.01), with increased setback reducing exposure by approximately 0.38 dB/m and perpendicular facades lowering levels by 3–4 dB. Results provide empirical support for key components of a source–path–building framework for outdoor-to-indoor noise transmission, highlighting that no single parameter ensures acoustic comfort.
SecchiSAstolfiACalossoG, et al. Effect of outdoor noise and façade sound insulation on indoor acoustic environment of Italian schools. Appl Acoust2017; 126: 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.023
2.
WenXLuGLvK, et al. Impacts of traffic noise on roadside secondary schools in a prototype large Chinese city. Appl Acoust2019; 151: 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.02.024
MealingsK.Classroom acoustics and cognition: A review of the effects of noise and reverberation on primary school children’s attention and memory. Build Acoust2022; 29(3): 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010x221104892
5.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI); Acoustical Society of America (ASA). ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010/part 1: acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools—part 1: permanent schools. ANSI, 2010.
6.
Standards Australia; Standards New Zealand. AS/NZS 2107:2016—acoustics: recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors. Standards Australia; Standards New Zealand, 2016.
7.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). DIN 18041:2016-03—acoustic quality in rooms—Specifications and instructions for the room acoustic design. DIN, 2016.
8.
Department for Education. Building bulletin 93: acoustic design of schools—performance standards. Department for Education, 2015.
9.
Boverket. Boverkets byggregler (BBR 18): mandatory provisions and general recommendations. National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, 2011.
10.
Swedish Standards Institute (SIS). SS 25268:2023—acoustics—sound classification of spaces in buildings—educational premises. SIS, 2023.
11.
Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). AIJ environmental standards for Schools (AIJES-S0001-2020). AIJ, 2020.
12.
Society of Acoustics of China. T/SASC—technical specification for acoustic design of school buildings. SASC; 2018.
13.
Bureau for Standardisation (NBN). NBN S01-400-2—acoustic criteria for school buildings. NBN, 2014.
14.
DirgawatiMAprianiGNAsyariAA, et al. Traffic-related noise at roadside schools: Assessment and prediction in urban setting. J Teknol Lingkung2021; 22(2): 178–189. https://doi.org/10.29122/jtl.v22i2.4607
15.
MendheSMDeshmukhAM.A scoping review of noise transmission from outdoors into classrooms: factors, impacts and mitigation strategies. Acoust Aust2025; 53: 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-024-00343-x
Bureau of Indian Standards. National Building Code of India 2016. Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016.
18.
PinhoPGPintoMAlmeidaRMSF, et al. Aspects concerning the acoustical performance of school buildings in Portugal. Appl Acoust2016; 106: 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.01.002
19.
CaoYGengYChenJ, et al. On-Site monitoring and a hybrid prediction method for noise impact on sensitive buildings near Urban Rail Transit. Buildings2025; 15(17): 3227. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173227
20.
PhadkeKVAbo-HassebaAŠvecJG, et al. Influence of noise resulting from the location and conditions of classrooms and schools in upper Egypt on teachers’ voices. J Voice2019; 33(5): 802.e1–802.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.003
21.
Tristán HernándezEPavón GarcíaILópez NavarroJM, et al. Evaluation of noise environments during daily activities of university students. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2016; 22(2): 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1096610
22.
LiFWuMLaiC, et al. A maximum noise-level prediction method for high-speed railways in China: a case study using the Baiyun campus of Guangdong polytechnic normal university. Appl Acoust2019; 150: 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.01.032
SilvaLTOliveiraISSilvaJF.The impact of urban noise on primary schools. Perceptive evaluation and objective assessment. Appl Acoust2016; 106: 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.12.013
25.
Indian Roads Congress. IRC:SP:84-2014—manual of specifications and standards for noise barriers. Indian Roads Congress, 2014.
26.
AguilarAJde la Hoz-TorresMLCostaN, et al. Indoor acoustic quality of educational buildings in South West Europe: influence of current ventilation strategies. J Build Eng2023; 80: 108012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108012
27.
YılmazYŞansalKEAşcıgil-DincerM, et al. A methodology to determine appropriate façade aperture sizes considering comfort and performance criteria: a primary school classroom case. Indoor Built Environ2022; 31(7): 1874–1891. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x221080566
28.
BalasbanehATYeohDZainal AbidinAR.Life cycle sustainability assessment of window renovations in schools against noise pollution in tropical climates. J Build Eng2020; 32: 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101784
HuangXLiuJMengZ.Application of university campus noise map based on noise propagation model: a case in Guangxi University. Sustainability2022; 14(14): 8613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148613
32.
YangHSChoHMKimMJ.On-site measurements for noise reduction through open windows of classrooms with different building dispositions. Appl Acoust2018; 139: 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.04.030
