This research set out to broaden the pool of evidence regarding the acoustic conditions at schools in South Africa. A review of local and international literature, standards and design guidelines shows that the ideal classroom acoustic conditions of 35 dBA ambient and 0.7 s reverberation time are required to enable a suitable environment for teaching and learning. A review of local literature revealed a very small body of knowledge regarding actual acoustic conditions and monitoring of classroom acoustics and that these cases demonstrated ambient noise levels in classrooms (whether occupied or unoccupied) to be above the recommendations of the relevant South African National Standard (SANS 10103). The limited local research promted the need for this case study. The findings of a province-wide survey of urban schools showed that traffic noise is the main source of noise disturbance in schools. A case study of five schools showed that the average outdoor noise level at schools exposed to traffic throughout the day is 63.3 dBA and the average indoor noise level at these schools when classrooms are unoccupied is approximately 58 dBA, which is significantly higher than the requirement. The reverberation time in classrooms was between 0.6 and 1.75 s. It is concluded that the current acoustic conditions in South African urban schools is poor when evaluated against the South African National Standards. However, since this is based on only five case studies, a broader study is required to understand the general conditions and establish suitable mitigation measures.
DockrellJEShieldBM.Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. Br Educ Res J2006; 32: 509–525.
2.
JamiesonDGKranjcGYuK, et al. Speech intelligibility of young school-aged children in the presence of real-life classroom noise. J Am Acad Audiol2004; 15: 508–517.
3.
PuglisiGEPratoASaccoT, et al. Influence of classroom acoustics on the reading speed: a case study on Italian second-graders. J Acoust Soc Am2018; 144: EL144–EL149.
4.
HyggeSEvansGWGGWBullingerM.A prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise on cognitive performance in schoolchildren. Psychol Sci2002; 13: 469–474.
5.
HyggeSBomanEVAEnmarkerI.The effects of road traffic noise and meaningful irrelevant speech on different memory systems. Scand J Psychol2003; 44: 13–21.
6.
LouwP.The effects of aircraft noise on children’s memory and attention. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2012, pp.1–92.
7.
BistafaSRBradleyJS.Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech. J Acoust Soc Am2000; 107(2): 861–875.
8.
BreitsprecherC. Effects of reverberation on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2011.
9.
SeabiJCockcroftKGoldschaggP, et al. The impact of aircraft noise exposure on South African children’s reading comprehension: the moderating effect of home language. Noise Health2012; 14(60): 244–252.
AstolfiABottalicoPBarbatoG.Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2012; 131: 247–257.
12.
SatoHBradleyJS.Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2008; 123: 2064–2077.
13.
MaluskiSGibbsBM.The effect of construction material, contents and room geometry on the sound field in dwellings at low frequencies. Appl Acoust2004; 65: 31–44.
14.
RakerdBHunterEJBerardiM, et al. Assessing the acoustic characteristics of rooms: a tutorial with examples. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups2018; 3(19): 8–24.
15.
NeumanACWroblewskiMHajicekJ, et al. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear Hear2010; 31: 336–344.
16.
KlatteMBergströmKLachmannT.Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front Psychol2013; 4: 578.
17.
ConnollyDDockrellJShieldB, et al. The effects of classroom noise on the reading comprehension of adolescents. J Acoust Soc Am2019; 145: 372–381.
18.
LjungRSorqvistPHyggeS.Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children’s reading and mathematical performance. Noise Health2009; 11: 194.
NelsonPKohnertKSaburS, et al. Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy?Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2005; 36: 219–229.
van ReenenCKarusseitC. Classroom acoustics as a consideration for inclusive education in South Africa. South African J Commun Disord2017; 64: 10.
23.
BluyssenPM.Health, comfort and performance of children in classrooms – new directions for research. Indoor Built Environ2017; 26: 1040–1050.
24.
YangWBradleyJS.Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 125: 922–933.
25.
SoderlundGSikstromSLoftesnesJ, et al. The effects of background white noise on memory performance in inattentive school children. Behav Brain Funct2010; 6: 55.
26.
AbikoffHCourtneyMESzeibelPJ, et al. The effects of auditory stimulation on the arithmetic performance of children with ADHD and nondisabled children. J Learn Disabil1996; 29: 238–246.
27.
SilvaLTOliveiraISSilvaJF.The impact of urban noise on primary schools. Perceptive evaluation and objective assessment. Appl Acoust2016; 106: 2–9.
28.
AnaGRShendellDGBrownGE, et al. Assessment of noise and associated health impacts at selected secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Environ Public Health. Epub ahead of print 8 October 2009. DOI: 10.1155/2009/739502.
29.
SarantopoulosGLykoudisSKassomenosP.Noise levels in primary schools of medium sized city in Greece. Sci Total Environ2014; 482–483: 493–500.
30.
PuglisiGEAstolfiACantor CutivaLC, et al. Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 141: 441–452.
31.
CalossoGPuglisiGEAstolfiA, et al. A one-school year longitudinal study of secondary school teachers’ voice parameters and the influence of classroom acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 142: 1055–1066.
32.
CiprianoMAstolfiAPelegrín-GarcíaD.Combined effect of noise and room acoustics on vocal effort in simulated classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 141: EL51–EL56.
MealingsK. Classroom acoustic conditions: understanding what is suitable through a review of national and international standards, recommendations, and live classroom measurements. In: The second Australasian acoustical societies’ conference, Acoustics 2016, Brisbane, Australia2016, vol. 2, pp.1–10.
35.
Acoustical Society of America. ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010/Part 1 American national standard acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, Part 1: permanent schools. Melville: Acoustical Society of America, 2010.
36.
Department for Education. Acoustic design of schools – performance standards. Build Bull2015; 93: 1–43.
ParkerG. Effective noise barrier design and specification. In: Proceedings of Acoustics 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006.
39.
BerglundBLindvallTSchwelaDH. Guidelines for community noise. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999.
40.
SABS Standards Division. SANS 10400-A:2016. South African National Standard. The application of the National Building Regulations. Part A: General principles and rquirements. Pretoria, South Africa: SABS Standards Division, 2016.
41.
Department of Education. The national minimum uniform norms and standards for school infrastructure. Department of Basic Education, Pretoria, South Africa, 2009; 1: 1–35.
42.
Department of Basic Education. Regulations relating to minimum uniform norms and standards for public school infrastructure. Government Notice 37081, Pretoria, South Africa, 2013, pp.19–20.
43.
AmsterdamC.School infrastructure in South Africa: views and experiences of educators and learners. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2010, pp.1–5.
44.
ProzeskyE. Die verkenning en beskrywing van stressors van leerders in ’n Graad 1-leeromgewing. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2005.
45.
RammaL.Knowledge and attitudes of teachers regarding the impact of classroom acoustics on speech perception and learning. S Afr J Commun Disord2009; 56: 35–47.
46.
RammaL.Rethinking our classrooms: assessment of background noise levels and reverberation in schools. Educ Change2007; 11: 115–130.
47.
NaudeMMeierC.Elements of the physical learning environment that impact on the teaching and learning in South African Grade 1 classrooms. S Afr J Educ2019; 39: 1–11.
48.
SeabiJM. Chronic aircraft noise exposure effects on children’s learning and development. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2014.
49.
MarumoMO. The influence of improved acoustics on English First Additional Language teaching and learning in the Foundation Phase. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2018.
van der MerweHM. The construct validity and reliability of the memory scale, the search and memory task, and the Toulouse-Pieron test for a sample of South African primary school learners. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2009, pp.1–103.
52.
VolkelG. The longitudinal effect of treatment, gender, socio-economic status and home language on primary school children’s reading comprehension, annoyance reactions to road and aircraft noise exposure and coping, in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2017.
53.
NchemanyiJN. Community perceptions on noise pollution generated by aircraft in cape town. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa, 2006.
54.
HatchuelWBeronA.Hearing loss in children – an investigation into the incidence of hearing defects among children attending a South African primary school. SA Med J1965; 38: 130–136.
55.
WieseA.An investigation into ambient noise levels at Rietenbosch primary school. Doctoral Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2018.
56.
KasimonjeBM. Impact of aircraft noise and language on primary school learners’ reading comprehension in KwaZulu- Natal. University of Withwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2012.
57.
FergusonKTCassellsRCMacAllisterJW, et al. The physical environment and child development: an international review. Int J Psychol2013; 48: 437–468.
58.
Van TonderCLWilliamsC. Exploring the origins of burnout among secondary educators. SA J Ind Psychol2009; 35: 204–218.
59.
BoninelliIFerreiraTMMeffertP. Classroom acoustics and auditory figure-ground discrimination. South African Institute for Psychological and Psychometric Research, Pretoria, South Africa, 1981.
60.
HollanderC. The effects of aircraft noise on the auditory language processing abilities of English first language primary school learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2011.
61.
KathardHRammaLPascoeM, et al. How can speech-language therapists and audiologists enhance language and literacy outcomes in South Africa? (And why we urgently need to). S Afr J Commun Disord2011; 58: 59–71.
62.
SeabiJCockcroftKGoldschaggP, et al. A prospective follow-up study of the effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure on learners’ reading comprehension in South Africa. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol2015; 25: 84–88.
63.
EhlertK.Perceptions of public primary school teachers regarding noise-induced hearing loss in South Africa. S Afr J Commun Disord2017; 64: e1–e12.
HollanderCde AndradeVM.The effects of aircraft noise on the auditory language processing abilities of English first language primary school learners in Durban, South Africa. Urban Educ2014; 49: 783–805.
66.
AndersonK-LKritzingerAPottasL.Auditory skills and listening comprehension in English second language learners in Grade 1. S Afr J Childood Educ2019; 9: 1–10.
67.
van DijkCHugoRLouwB. The needs of teachers of children with hearing loss within the inclusive education system. S Afr J Commun Disord2004; 51: 23–44.
68.
KassutoCJ. Architects’ and acoustic consultants’ low-cost consideration for improving classroom acoustics in the South African context. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2019.
69.
TorijaAJFlindellIH.Listening laboratory study of low height roadside noise barrier performance compared against in-situ field data. Build Environ2014; 81: 216–225.
70.
EhrlichGEGurovichY.A typical case study of school sound insulation. Sound Vib2004; 38: 16–19.
71.
KapetanakiSKonstantopoulouSLinosA.Noise measurements and sources of noise in primary schools located in vulnerable areas in Greece: a cross-sectional study. Occup Med Health Aff2018; 6(3): 277. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000277.
72.
MinnaarLHeystekJ. Online surveys as data collection instruments in education research: a feasible option? Pretoria: Unisa Press, 2013.
