Traffic noise transmission through the open windows of naturally-ventilated classrooms can reduce speech intelligibility and can negatively impact academic performance. The findings of a numerical study are presented. Software was used to assess effective noise attenuation solutions for naturally-ventilated classrooms exposed to traffic noise. A typical situation in urban schools in Gauteng, South Africa, is considered in which classrooms are ventilated by large open windows in accordance with national building regulations and norms and standards for school design. The aim of the study was to establish a heuristic framework for early design decisions regarding how far from the road a classroom building should be set, and the effective height and position of a solid noise barrier to ensure a suitable ambient noise level inside a classroom with open windows. Efficacy was measured with reference to an indoor ambient sound level of 40 dBA. The findings show that with the insertion of barriers, the required ambient level was achieved for a classroom at least 68 m from the road, if the barrier is at least 3.5 m high. However, it was found that a significant insertion loss (>6 dB) and an improved signal to noise ratio could be achieved for classrooms as close as 17 m from the road with a barrier of at least 2 m high. Though not broadly generalizable, the findings provide a heuristic guide applicable for designing new schools or selecting attenuation interventions in existing city schools that are similar to those used in the study.
ZuberWJ. The flipped classroom, a review of the literature. Ind Commer Training2016; 48: 97–103.
2.
DeedCLeskoT. ‘Unwalling’ the classroom: teacher reaction and adaptation. Learn Environ Res2015; 18: 217–231.
3.
AbdelrazeqAJanssenDTummelC, et al. Teacher 4.0: requirements of the teacher of the future in context of the fourth industrial revolution. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of education, research and innovation, Seville, Spain, October 2016.
4.
DavisL. Classroom 4.0. Lindf Mag, p.14.
5.
MarchandGCNardiNMReynoldsD, et al. The impact of the classroom built environment on student perceptions and learning. J Environ Psychol2014; 40: 187–197.
6.
BakerL. A history of school design and its indoor environment standards, 1900 to today. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities, 2012.
7.
BarrettPDaviesFZhangY, et al. The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Build Environ2015; 89: 118–133.
8.
KlatteMBergströmKLachmannT. Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front Psychol2013; 4: 578.
9.
DockrellJEShieldBM. Acoustical barriers in classrooms: the impact of noise on performance in the classroom. Br Educ Res J2006; 32: 509–525.
10.
SubramaniamNRamachandraiahA. Speech intelligibility issues in classroom acoustics-a review. J Inst Eng Archit Eng Div2006; 87: 29–33.
11.
SeabiJM. Chronic aircraft noise exposure effects on children’s learning and development. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2014.
12.
HyggeSBomanEEnmarkerI. The effects of road traffic noise and meaningful irrelevant speech on different memory systems. Scand J Psychol2003; 44(1): 13–21.
13.
Van ReenenCKarusseitC. Classroom acoustics as a consideration for inclusive education in South Africa. S Afr J Commun Disord2017; 64: 10.
14.
KristiansenJLundSPPerssonR, et al. A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers’ noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2014; 87: 851–860.
15.
CalossoGPuglisiGEAstolfiA, et al. A one-school year longitudinal study of secondary school teachers’ voice parameters and the influence of classroom acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 142: 1055–1066.
16.
Department of Basic Education. Regulations relating to minimum uniform Norms and standards for public school infrastructure. South Africa. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 9771682584003-32963.
17.
SilvaLTOliveiraISSilvaJF. The impact of urban noise on primary schools. Perceptive evaluation and objective assessment. Appl Acoust2016; 106: 2–9.
18.
HyggeSEvansGWBullingerM. A prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise on cognitive performance in schoolchildren. Psychol Sci2002; 13: 469–474.
19.
ClarkCMartinRvan KempenE, et al. Exposure-effect relations between aircraft and road traffic noise exposure at school and reading comprehension: the RANCH project. Am J Epidemiol2006; 163: 27–37.
20.
PaunovicKBelojevicGJakovljevicB. Blood pressure of urban school children in relation to road-traffic noise, traffic density and presence of public transport. Noise Health2013; 15: 253.
21.
AnaGRShendellDGBrownGE, et al. Assessment of noise and associated health impacts at selected secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Environ Public Health2009; 2009: 739502.
KapetanakiSKonstantopoulouSLinosA. Noise measurements and sources of noise in primary schools located in vulnerable areas in Greece: a cross-sectional study. Occup Med Health Aff2018; 6: 6.
25.
KaramiKCheraghiMFiroozabadiMS. Trafifc noise As a serious effect On class teacher In Firoozabad city, Iran. Med J Islam World Acad Sci2012; 20(2): 39–42.
van ReenenCPlessisCD. Acoustics in South African classrooms: regulations versus reality. Build Acoust. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1351010X211036904.
31.
TwardellaDMatzenWLahrzT, et al. Effect of classroom air quality on students’ concentration: results of a cluster-randomized cross-over experimental study. Indoor Air2012; 22: 378–387.
32.
Haverinen-ShaughnessyUMoschandreasDJShaughnessyRJ. Association between substandard classroom ventilation rates and students’ academic achievement. Indoor Air2011; 21: 121–131.
33.
PattersonBMorrowCDKohlsD, et al. Mapping sites of high TB transmission risk: integrating the shared air and social behaviour of TB cases and adolescents in a South African township. Sci Total Environ2017; 583: 97–103.
34.
Standards South Africa. SANS 10103:2008. The measurement and rating of environmental noise with respect to annoyance and to speech communication. Pretoria: Standards South Africa, 2008.
SarantopoulosGLykoudisSKassomenosP. Noise levels in primary schools of medium sized city in Greece. Sci Total Environ2014; 482–483: 493–500.
40.
De SalisMHOldhamDJSharplesS. Noise control strategies for naturally ventilated buildings. Build Environ2002; 37: 471–484.
41.
YangWJeonJY. Design strategies and elements of building envelope for urban acoustic environment. Build Environ2020; 182: 107121.
42.
YeungMNgILamJ, et al. Tackling traffic noise through plenum windows – an application in Hong Kong. In: Internoise 2014, Melbourne, Australia, 16–19November2014, pp.4–7.
43.
BadinoEMancaRShtrepiL, et al. Effect of façade shape and acoustic cladding on reduction of leisure noise levels in a street canyon. Build Environ2019; 157: 242–256.
44.
LocherBPiquerezAHabermacherM, et al. Differences between outdoor and indoor sound levels for open, tilted, and closed windows. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 1–16.
45.
MealingsK. Classroom acoustic conditions : understanding what is suitable through a review of national and international standards, recommendations, and live classroom measurements. Australas Acoust Soc Conf Acoust2016; 2: 1–10.
46.
Standards South Africa. SANS 10218-1:2004 Acoustical properties of buildings Part 1 : Grading criteria for the airborne sound insulation properties of buildings. Pretoria: Standards South Africa, 2004.
47.
ProbstW. Benchmark tests to rank software for noise prediction. In: Proceedings of ICSV14, Cairns, Australia, 9–12 July 2007.
48.
ProbstWProbstF. Validation of calculation methods for sound propagation outdoors. In: NOISE-CON 2011, Portland, Oregon, 25–27 July 2011.
49.
RakerdBHunterEJBerardiM, et al. Assessing the acoustic characteristics of rooms: a tutorial with examples. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups2018; 3: 8–24.
ScamoniFScrosatiC. The façade sound insulation and its classification. In: Forum Acusticum 2014, Krakow, 7–12 September 2014.
52.
Sobreira-SeoaneMARodríguez-MolaresAMartín-HerreroJ, et al. Automated {EN} 12354 calculations of entire buildings: sonarchitect Iso. Proc Internoise2010; 2010: 1–13.
53.
ISO 140-5. Acoustics – measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements – part 5: field measurements of airborne sound insulation of façade elements and façades. 1998.
54.
UrbánDRoozenNBZaťkoP, et al. Assessment of sound insulation of naturally ventilated double skin facades. Build Environ2016; 110: 148–160.
McSheffertyDWhitmerWMAkeroydMA. The just-meaningful difference in speech-to-noise ratio. Trends Hear2016; 20: 2331216515626570.
57.
AstolfiAPellereyF. Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am2008; 123(1): 163–173.
58.
KlatteMLachmannTMeisM. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise Health2010; 12: 270–282.
59.
McSheffertyDWhitmerWMAkeroydMA. The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio. Trends Hear. Epub ahead of print 12 February 2015. DOI: 10.1177/2331216515626570.
