This paper presents a critical review on the measuring methods and parameters affecting nano-tribology in the context of nano-scale wear. Nano-scale wear phenomena play a crucial role in various industries, including micro/nano-systems, electronics, and biotechnology. The review begins by discussing the significance of nano-scale wear and its impact on device performance, lifespan, durability, energy efficiency, cost savings, and environmental sustainability. It then delves into the measuring methods employed to assess nano-scale wear, including scanning probe microscopy (SPM) techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) and friction force microscopy (FFM). The capabilities of AFM and FFM in studying the roughness of surface, adhesion, friction, scratch, abrasion, and nano-scale material transfer are highlighted. Additionally, the review explores the parameters affecting nano-wear, such as lubrication strategies, stress levels, sliding velocity, and atomic-scale reactions. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of advanced microscopy techniques in understanding tribological mechanisms at different scales, bridging the gap between macro and nano-tribology studies.
Feynman R. Nanotechnology. Caltechs Eng Sci. 1960; 23: 22–36.
2.
VakisAIYastrebovVAScheibertJ, et al.Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: an overview. Tribol Int2018; 125: 169–199.
3.
TakahataK. Advances in micro/nano electromechanical systems and fabrication technologies. Rijeka: InTech, 2013.
4.
EsashiM. Micro/nano electro mechanical systems for practical applications. J Phys Conf Ser2009; 187: 012001.
5.
SharmaPKaushikNKimuraH, et al.Nano-fabrication with metallic glass—an exotic material for nano-electromechanical systems. Nanotechnology2007; 18: 035302.
6.
JanickeMJacobK. A third industrial revolution. In: Long-term governance for social-ecological change. New York: MedCrave, 2013, pp.47–71.
7.
AlamM. Industrial tribology in the past, present and future: a review. Mater Sci Eng2021; 5: 85–91.
8.
RathaurASKatiyarJKPatelVK. Introduction and applications of tribology. In: Tribology in materials and applications. Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp.1–14.
9.
BhushanB. Nanotribology and nanomechanics: an introduction. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
10.
BhushanB. Nanotribology and nanomechanics. Wear2005; 259: 1507–1531.
11.
CampuzanoSDe ÁvilaBE-FYáñez-SedeñoP, et al.Nano/microvehicles for efficient delivery and (bio) sensing at the cellular level. Chem Sci2017; 8: 6750–6763.
12.
NikoleliG-PSiontorouCGNikolelisDP, et al.Biosensors based on microfluidic devices lab-on-a-chip and microfluidic technology. Nanotechnol Biosens2018; 8: 375–394.
13.
PortneyNGOzkanM. Nano-oncology: drug delivery, imaging, and sensing. Anal Bioanal Chem2006; 384: 620–630.
14.
SiaSKWhitesidesGM. Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly (dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis2003; 24: 3563–3576.
15.
ChenJDoumanidisHLyonsK, et al. Manufacturing at the nanoscale. Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshops, 2002-2004. NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY COORDINATION OFFICE ARLINGTON VA, 2007.
16.
WuQMiaoW-SGaoH-J,et al.Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: a review. Nanotechnol Rev2020; 9: 259–273.
17.
DevashreePSMYerukolaP. Nanomaterials Market by Material Type (Carbon Based Nanomaterials, Metal and Non-Metal Oxides, Metal, Dendrimers, Nanoclay, Nanocellulose), by End Use Industry (Paints & Coatings, Adhesives & Sealants, Health Care & Life Science, Energy, Electronics & Consumer Goods, Personal Care, Others): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021-2031. August 2022.
18.
InshakovaEInshakovO. World market for nanomaterials: structure and trends. In: MATEC web of conferences: EDP sciences, 2017, p.02013.
DivyanshiT. Nanotechnology market by type (nanosensor and nanodevice) and application (electronics, energy, chemical manufacturing, aerospace & defense, healthcare, and others): global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 2021-2030. Allied Market Research; July 2021.
22.
UzomaPCHuHKhademM,et al.Tribology of 2D nanomaterials: a review. Coatings2020; 10: 897.
23.
BasuAKBhattacharyyaS. Scaling law. In: BasuAKBasuAGhoshS, et al. (eds) MEMS applications in electronics and engineering. Chapter 2. New York: AIP Publishing LLC, 2023, pp.13–35.
24.
BhushanB. Frontiers in nanotribology: magnetic storage, bio/nanotechnology, cosmetics, and bioinspiration. J Colloid Interface Sci2020; 577: 127–162.
25.
BhushanB. Nanotribology and nanomechanics in nano/biotechnology. Phil Trans R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci2008; 366: 1499–1537.
26.
RojaczHNevosadAVargaM. On wear mechanisms and microstructural changes in nano-scratches of fcc metals. Wear2023; 526-527: 204928.
27.
LuoCJiangYLiuY, et al.Role of interfacial bonding in tribochemical wear. Front Chem2022; 10: 852371.
28.
AbdelbaryA. Extreme tribology: fundamentals and challenges. New York: CRC Press, 2020.
29.
ColaçoR. From nano and microcontacts to wear of materials. In: GneccoEMeyerE (eds) Fundamentals of friction and wear on the nanoscale. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp.517–543.
30.
CarpickRWJacobsTD. Nanoscale wear as a stress-assisted chemical reaction: an in-situ TEM study. Microsc Microanal2014; 20: 1542–1543.
31.
TambeNBhushanB. Nanowear mapping: a novel atomic force microscopy based approach for studying nanoscale wear at high sliding velocities. Tribol Lett2005; 20: 83–90.
32.
MarchettoDRotaACalabriL, et al.AFM Investigation of tribological properties of nano-patterned silicon surface. Wear2008; 265: 577–582.
33.
BastatasLMartinez-MarinDMatthewsJ, et al.AFM nano-mechanics and calcium dynamics of prostate cancer cells with distinct metastatic potential. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Gen Subj2012; 1820: 1111–1120.
34.
AnRLaaksonenAWuM, et al.Atomic force microscopy probing interactions and microstructures of ionic liquids at solid surfaces. Nanoscale2022; 14: 11098–11128.
35.
DuSZhuZLiuC, et al.Experimental observation and finite element method modeling on scratch-induced delamination of multilayer polymeric structures. Polym Eng Sci2021; 61: 1742–1754.
36.
BhushanBBhushanBBaumann. Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Berlin: Springer; 2007.
37.
BhushanBMartiO. Scanning probe microscopy—principle of operation, instrumentation, and probes. In: Nanotribology and nanomechanics. New York: Springer, 2017, pp.33–93.
38.
SalapakaSMSalapakaMV. Scanning probe microscopy. IEEE Control Syst2008; 28: 65–83.
39.
BinnigGRohrerH. Scanning tunneling microscopy. IBM J Res Dev2000; 44: 279–293.
40.
MooreDF. Principles and applications of tribology: pergamon international library of science, technology, engineering and social studies: international series in materials science and technology. Oxford: Elsevier, 2013.
41.
BhushanB. Nanotribology and nanomechanics: an introduction. Switzerland: Springer, 2017.
42.
BhushanBBhushanB. Micro/nanotribology and micro/nanomechanics of magnetic storage devices. In: Nanotribology and nanomechanics: an introduction. New York: Springer, 2008, pp.1137–1197.
43.
TersoffJHamannDR. Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope. Phys Rev B1985; 31: 805–813.
44.
FangFJuB. Scanning tunneling microscope. In: LaperrièreLReinhartG (eds) CIRP Encyclopedia of production engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp.1090–1092.
45.
ChenJ. Introduction to scanning tunneling microscopy. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
46.
BaiC. Scanning tunneling microscopy and its application. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2000.
47.
BuiKFaumanJKesD, et al.Segmentation of scanning tunneling microscopy images using variational methods and empirical wavelets. Pattern Anal Appl2020; 23: 625–651.
GiessiblFJ. Advances in atomic force microscopy. Rev Mod Phys2003; 75: 949–983.
51.
RugarDHansmaP. Atomic force microscopy. Phys Today1990; 43: 23–30.
52.
EatonPWestP. Atomic force microscopy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
53.
DufrêneYF. Towards nanomicrobiology using atomic force microscopy. Nat Rev Microbiol2008; 6: 674–680.
54.
MeyerE. Atomic force microscopy. Prog Surf Sci1992; 41: 3–49.
55.
TortoneseM. Cantilevers and tips for atomic force microscopy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag1997; 16: 28–33.
56.
RamanAMelcherJTungR. Cantilever dynamics in atomic force microscopy. Nano Today2008; 3: 20–27.
57.
KingWPBhatiaBFeltsJR, et al.Heated atomic force microscope cantilevers and their applications. Annu Rev Heat Trans2013; 16: 287–326.
58.
MoritaSGiessiblFJMeyerE,et al.Noncontact atomic force microscopy. Vol. 3. New York: Springer, 2015.
59.
AlbrechtTQuateC. Atomic resolution imaging of a nonconductor by atomic force microscopy. J Appl Phys1987; 62: 2599–2602.
60.
KimH-JYooS-SKimD-E. Nano-scale wear: a review. Int J Prec Eng Manuf2012; 13: 1709–1718.
61.
TambeNSBhushanB. Nanoscale friction and wear maps. Philos Trans: Math, Phys Eng Sci2008; 366: 1405–1424.
62.
Handschuh-WangSWangTZhouX. Recent advances in hybrid measurement methods based on atomic force microscopy and surface sensitive measurement techniques. RSC Adv2017; 7: 47464–47499.
63.
PuckertCTomaskovic-CrookEGambhirS, et al.Electro-mechano responsive properties of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel on conducting polymer electrodes quantified using atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter2017; 13: 4761–4772.
64.
BhushanBLiuH. Nanotribological properties and mechanisms of alkylthiol and biphenyl thiol self-assembled monolayers studied by AFM. Phys Rev B2001; 63: 245412.
65.
BhushanBGoldadeAV. Measurements and analysis of surface potential change during wear of single-crystal silicon (100) at ultralow loads using Kelvin probe microscopy. Appl Surf Sci2000; 157: 373–381.
66.
BhushanBIsraelachviliJNLandmanU. Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale. Nature1995; 374: 607–616.
67.
BhushanBRuanJ-A. Atomic-scale friction measurements using friction force microscopy: part II—application to magnetic media. J Tribol1994; 116: 389–396.
68.
DuSXiaoSWoosJ, et al.Effect of grain pattern and talc content on scratch and mar behaviors of textured thermoplastic olefins. In: SPE ANTEC 2018: annual technical conference for plastic professionals 2018.
69.
DuSHamdiMSueH-J. Experimental and FEM analysis of mar behavior on amorphous polymers. Wear2020; 444-445: 203155.
70.
DuSHamdiMSueHJ. Finite element modeling on barrel mar behavior of amorphous polymers. In: SPE ANTEC 2020: annual technical conference for plastic professionals, 2020, p.363–367. Society of Plastics Engineers.
71.
MarquisECutiniMAnasoriB, et al.Nanoscale MXene interlayer and substrate adhesion for lubrication: a density functional theory study. ACS Appl Nano Mater2022; 5: 10516–10527.
72.
ChungK-HKimD-E. Fundamental investigation of micro wear rate using an atomic force microscope. Tribol Lett2003; 15: 135–144.
73.
ShaoYFalkM. Molecular dynamics simulation investigations of atomic-scale wear. APS March Meeting Abstracts, 2013, R28. 010.
74.
RamayanamSS. Fundamental study of nano-scale adhesion and friction properties of graphene in ambient air and liquid environments. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University, 2015.
75.
BhushanBKwakKJ. Velocity dependence of nanoscale wear in atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett2007; 91: 163113.
76.
BhushanB. Boundary lubrication studies using atomic force/friction force microscopy. In: Handbook of micro/nano tribology. New York: CRC Press, 2020, pp.357–370.
77.
JiangZLuCJBogyDB,et al.An investigation of the experimental conditions and characteristics of a nano-wear test. Wear1995; 181-183: 777–783.
78.
VeličkovićSStojanovićBBabićM, et al.Parametric optimization of the aluminium nanocomposites wear rate. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41: 1–10.
79.
KonradJGneccoEDietzelD,et al.Anisotropy of nanoscale friction: influence of lattice structure, temperature, and wear. Phys Rev B2023; 107: 195438.
80.
WangKLaiJXuJ, et al.Multiscale analysis of wheel-rail rolling contact wear and damage mechanisms using molecular dynamics and explicit finite elements. Tribol Int2023; 185: 108574.
81.
KoinkarVNBhushanB. Microtribological studies of Al2O3, Al2O3 · TiC, polycrystalline and single-crystal Mn · Zn ferrite, and SiC head slider materials. Wear1996; 202: 110–122.
82.
BogyDBLuC-JJiangZ,et al.Experimental determination of tribological properties of ultra-thin solid films. In: CaseyJCrochetMJ (eds) Theoretical, experimental, and numerical contributions to the mechanics of fluids and solids: a collection of papers in honor of Paul M Naghdi. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 1995, pp.483–505.
83.
ThakurPChaharDTanejaS, et al.A review on MnZn ferrites: synthesis, characterization and applications. Ceram Int2020; 46: 15740–15763.
84.
RahamanMNSonnybalB. 7 - New ceramics and composites for joint replacement surgery. In: LysaghtMWebsterTJ (eds) Biomaterials for artificial organs. Elsevier, 2011, pp.185–206.
85.
XuTTChengSJinLZ, et al.High-temperature flexural strength of SiC ceramics prepared by additive manufacturing. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2020; 17: 438–448.
86.
DengJCanTSunJ. Microstructure and mechanical properties of hot-pressed Al2O3/TiC ceramic composites with the additions of solid lubricants. Ceram Int2005; 31: 249–256.
87.
DwivediDK. Adhesive wear behaviour of cast aluminium–silicon alloys: overview. Mater Des (1980-2015)2010; 31: 2517–2531.
88.
ChenYYangKLinH, et al.Important contributions of multidimensional nanoadditives on the tribofilms: from formation mechanism to tribological behaviors. Compos B: Eng2022; 234: 109732.
89.
GajevicSGajicSStojanovicB,et al.Tribological properties of aluminium matrix nanocomposites. Appl Eng Lett2016; 1: 72–79.
90.
JeyasimmanDNarayanasamyRPonalagusamyR, et al.The effects of various reinforcements on dry sliding wear behaviour of AA 6061 nanocomposites. Mater Des2014; 64: 783–793.
91.
SadeghiBShamanianMAshrafizadehF, et al.Wear behavior of AI-based nanocomposites reinforced with bimodal micro-and nano-sized AI O particles produced by spark plasma sintering. Mater Perform Charact2018; 7: 327–350.
92.
LiXFanZHuangS, et al.Brittle-to-ductile transition in nanoscratching of silicon and gallium arsenide using Berkovich and Conical tips. Appl Surf Sci2023; 637: 157934.
93.
HeYZhangLCuiJ,et al.Blunting and wear of AFM tips during dynamic lithography. Wear2023; 522: 204694.
94.
DaiGPohlenzFFelgnerA, et al.Quantitative analysis of nano-wear on DLC coatings by AFM. CIRP Ann2013; 62: 543–546.
95.
LiuHBhushanB. Nanotribological characterization of molecularly thick lubricant films for applications to MEMS/NEMS by AFM. Ultramicroscopy2003; 97: 321–340.
96.
WangJZhuangWLiangW, et al.Inorganic nanomaterial lubricant additives for base fluids, to improve tribological performance: recent developments. Friction2022; 10: 645–676.
97.
AdmankarVBhatJBhapkarU. Experimental investigation and optimization of tribological properties for worm gear with different additives percentage of lubricating oil: a review. Mater Today Proc2022; 50: 1697–1699.
98.
SahooRRBiswasSK. Effect of layered MoS2 nanoparticles on the frictional behavior and microstructure of lubricating greases. Tribol Lett2014; 53: 157–171.
99.
ChenJJuC. Effect of sliding speed on the tribological behavior of a PAN-pitch carbon-carbon composite. Mater Chem Phys1995; 39: 174–179.
100.
MaoLCaiMLiuQ,et al.Effects of sliding speed on the tribological behavior of AA 7075 petroleum casing in simulated drilling environment. Tribol Int2020; 145: 106194.
101.
FernandesPJLMcDulingC. Surface contact fatigue failures in gears. Eng Fail Anal1997; 4: 99–107.
102.
XingXWangQMengS, et al.Fatigue and recrystallization evolution of carbide-free bainitic layer under high-stress rolling sliding contact. Wear2023; 526-527: 204958.
103.
ChenZHeXXiaoC,et al.Effect of humidity on friction and wear—a critical review. Lubricants2018; 6: 74.
104.
ClaerboutVENicoliniPPolcarT. Exploring nanoscale lubrication mechanisms of multilayer MoS2 during sliding: the effect of humidity. Front Chem2021; 9: 684441.
105.
WangHLinNYuanS, et al.Numerical simulation on hydrodynamic lubrication performance of bionic multi-scale composite textures inspired by surface patterns of subcrenata and clam shells. Tribol Int2023; 181: 108335.
106.
SotresJArnebrantT. Experimental investigations of biological lubrication at the nanoscale: the cases of synovial joints and the oral cavity. Lubricants2013; 1: 102–131.
107.
HeHQianLPantanoCG,et al.Effects of humidity and counter-surface on tribochemical wear of soda-lime-silica glass. Wear2015; 342-343: 100–106.
108.
SariMVilleFHaiahemA,et al.Effect of lubricant contamination on friction and wear in an EHL sliding contact. Mechanics2010; 82: 43–49.
109.
RamadanMA. Friction and wear of sand-contaminated lubricated sliding. Friction2018; 6: 457–463.
110.
LiZLiYXiaoY, et al.Study on water resistance and tribological behaviours of basalt fibre/acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber composites under water lubrication at various temperatures. RSC Adv2019; 9: 34744–34753.
111.
WangWZhangGXieG. Ultralow concentration of graphene oxide nanosheets as oil-based lubricant additives. Appl Surf Sci2019; 498: 143683.
112.
HolmR. Friction wear in metallic contacts without current. In: Elektrische Kontakte/electric contacts handbook. Elsevier, 1958, pp.242–254.
113.
ArchardJ. Contact and rubbing. J Appl Phys1953; 23: 18.
114.
BhushanBNosonovskyM. Scale effects in dry and wet friction, wear, and interface temperature. Nanotechnology2004; 15: 749–761.
115.
BeraB. Adhesive wear theory of micromechanical surface contact. Int J Comput Eng Resour2013; 3: 73–78.
116.
ChowdhurySKRGhoshP. Adhesion and adhesional friction at the contact between solids. Wear1994; 174: 9–19.
117.
LiuYLiuYMaT, et al. Atomic scale simulation on the anti-pressure and friction reduction mechanisms of MoS₂ monolayer. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;11: 9–19.
118.
YangYO’HernCSHuangL,et al.The nature of atomic wear from molecular simulations. Tribol Int2022; 167: 107418.
119.
LiSYeW-TShiY-R, et al.Atomistic simulation and experimental verification of tribological behavior of high entropy alloy/graphene composite coatings. Surf Coat Technol2023; 467: 129683.
120.
SinghD. Molecular dynamics based simulations as an effective tool for studying coating materials on metals. In: Coating materials: computational aspects, applications and challenges. Elsevier, 2023, pp.157–165.
121.
HeJTangHWangC. Advances of molecular dynamics simulation in tribochemistry and lubrication investigations: a review. J Ind Eng Chem2023; 126: 1–19.
122.
BanijamaliSMShariat RazaviMPalizdarY, et al.Experimental and simulation study on wear behavior of ZK60 alloy with 3 wt.% Yttrium addition. J Mater Eng Perform2022; 31: 4721–4734.
123.
LiuYZhuDGilbertJL. Sub-nano to nanometer wear and tribocorrosion of titanium oxide-metal surfaces by in situ atomic force microscopy. Acta Biomater2021; 126: 477–484.
124.
AghababaeiRZhaoK. Micromechanics of material detachment during adhesive wear: a numerical assessment of Archard's wear model. Wear2021; 476: 203739.
ChenYGuoC-SGaoW,et al.Effective scheme for understanding rolling and sliding at nanoscale. Carbon N Y2020; 161: 269–276.
127.
NosonovskyMHsuSM. Model for adhesion-based energy dissipation during friction. In: International joint tribology conference, 2006, pp.1021–1141.
128.
LiangJHMilneZRouhaniM, et al.Stress-dependent adhesion and sliding-induced nanoscale wear of diamond-like carbon studied using in situ TEM nanoindentation. Carbon N Y2022; 193: 230–241.
129.
DuS. Numerical modeling on scratch and mar induced damages in polymeric systems. PhD Dissertation, 2020.
130.
XiaQGillespieDROwenAK,et al.Quasi-static thermal modeling of multiscale sliding contact for unlubricated brush seal materials. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2019; 141: 071016.
131.
JacobsTDBCarpickRW. Nanoscale wear as a stress-assisted chemical reaction. Nat Nanotechnol2013; 8: 108–112.
132.
GuoYZhouXLeeK, et al.Recent development in friction of 2D materials: from mechanisms to applications. Nanotechnology2021; 32: 312002.
133.
NaskarAChoudharyAPaulS. Wear mechanism in high-speed superabrasive grinding of titanium alloy and its effect on surface integrity. Wear2020; 462-463: 203475.
134.
HänggiPTalknerPBorkovecM. Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers. Rev Mod Phys1990; 62: 251–341.
135.
JacobsTDBGotsmannBLantzMA,et al.On the application of transition state theory to atomic-scale wear. Tribol Lett2010; 39: 257–271.
136.
MaceraF. Wear understood at the atomic level. Advanced Science News, 2013.
137.
WangYQinYFuD, et al.Behaviors of ZTA (zirconia toughened alumina) reinforced iron composites under impact abrasive wear conditions. Wear2020; 458-459: 203397.
138.
QiXWangHDongY, et al.Experimental analysis of the effects of laser surface texturing on tribological properties of PTFE/Kevlar fabric composite weave structures. Tribol Int2019; 135: 104–111.
139.
MazzuccoDSpectorM. Effects of contact area and stress on the volumetric wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Wear2003; 254: 514–522.
140.
YanYSunTLiangY,et al.Effects of scratching directions on AFM-based abrasive abrasion process. Tribol Int2009; 42: 66–70.
141.
XuXvan der ZwaagSXuW. The scratch and abrasive wear behaviour of a tempered martensitic construction steel and its dual phase variants. Wear2016; 358: 80–88.
142.
ZhouQLuoDHuaD, et al.Design and characterization of metallic glass/graphene multilayer with excellent nanowear properties. Friction2022; 10: 1913–1926.
143.
WangXKimSHChenC, et al.Humidity dependence of tribochemical wear of monocrystalline silicon. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015; 7: 14785–14792.
144.
LiZZhengFWangL, et al.Effect of hydrogen adsorption on the atomic-scale wear of few-layer graphene. Tribol Int2021; 164: 107208.
145.
LinL-YKimD-EKimW-K,et al.Friction and wear characteristics of multi-layer graphene films investigated by atomic force microscopy. Surf Coat Technol2011; 205: 4864–4869.
146.
Tran-KhacB-CKimH-JDelRioFW,et al.Operational and environmental conditions regulate the frictional behavior of two-dimensional materials. Appl Surf Sci2019; 483: 34–44.
147.
HuJZengQ. Friction and wear in nanoscratching of single crystals: effect of adhesion and plasticity. Nanomaterials2022; 12: 4191.
