Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The performances of aerostatic spindle are highly affected by the fluid–structure interaction between air film and solid structure. This paper proposes a comprehensive two-way fluid–structure interaction model to analyze the fluid–structure interaction effect of an aerostatic spindle. The structure deformation induced by air film pressure is considered to predict the actual performance of aerostatic spindle. Furthermore, to provide theoretical basis for the structure parameters design, the influence of structural dimensions (such as the thickness of thrust plate) on its performance is investigated, and optimal structural parameters are acquired. The stiffness of aerostatic spindle with varying thrust plate thickness is tested to verify the reliability of simulation results.

Keywords

Aerostatic spindle stiffness fluid–structure interaction ultra-precision machining optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chang

Chan

Jeng

. Discharge coefficients in aerostatic bearings with inherent orifice-type restrictors. J Tribol 2015; 137: 011705–011705.

Neves

Schwarz

Menon

. Discharge coefficient influence on the performance of aerostatic journal bearings. Tribol Int 2010; 43: 746–751.

Liu

Zhang

et al.

Performance analysis of rotating externally pressurized air bearings. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2009; 223: 653–663.

Abele

Altintas

Brecher

. Machine tool spindle units. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2010; 59: 781–802.

Chen

Chiu

Cheng

. Influences of operational conditions and geometric parameters on the stiffness of aerostatic journal bearings. Precis Eng 2010; 34: 722–734.

Chen

. The effect of the recess shape on performance analysis of the gas-lubricated bearing in optical lithography. Tribol Int 2006; 39: 1336–1341.

Jeng

Chang

. Comparison between the effects of single-pad and double-pad aerostatic bearings with pocketed orifices on bearing stiffness. Tribol Int 2013; 66: 12–18.

Ding

. Influences of the geometrical parameters of aerostatic thrust bearing with pocketed orifice-type restrictor on its performance. Tribol Int 2007; 40: 1120–1126.

Belforte

Raparelli

Trivella

et al.

CFD analysis of a simple orifice-type feeding system for aerostatic bearings. Tribol Lett 2015; 58: 1–8.

10.

Gao

Cheng

Chen

et al.

CFD based investigation on influence of orifice chamber shapes for the design of aerostatic thrust bearings at ultra-high speed spindles. Tribol Int 2015; 92: 211–221.

11.

Belforte

Colombo

Raparelli

et al.

Comparison between grooved and plane aerostatic thrust bearings: static performance. Meccanica 2011; 46: 547–555.

12.

Zhang

Liu

et al.

Improvement on load performance of externally pressurized gas journal bearings by opening pressure-equalizing grooves. Tribol Int 2014; 73: 156–166.

13.

Ding

Cheng

. Dynamics design and analysis of direct-drive aerostatic slideways in a multi-physics simulation environment. Int J Mech Eng Educ 2013; 41: 315–328.

14.

Aguirre

Al-Bender

Brussel

. A multiphysics model for optimizing the design of active aerostatic thrust bearings. Precis Eng 2010; 34: 507–515.

15.

Gao

Cheng

Ding

et al.

Multiphysics-based design and analysis of the high-speed aerostatic spindle with application to micro-milling. Proc IMechE Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2016; 230: 852–871.

16.

Chen

et al.

Optimal design of an aerostatic spindle based on fluid–structure interaction method and its verification. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2016; 230: 690–696.

17.

Chen

et al.

Aerostatic thrust bearing performances analysis considering the fluid–structure coupling effect. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2016; 230: 1588–1596.

Investigation on the fluid–structure interaction effect of an aerostatic spindle and the influence of structural dimensions on its performance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References