This paper presents the method of plasticity index calculation of isotropic two-process surfaces on the basis of index developed by Greenwood and Williamson for random surfaces of Gaussian ordinate distribution. This method was applied to computer generated isotropic two-process textures. The proposed plasticity index of two-process surface was compared with that of plateau surface and of the whole surface calculated by traditional manner. It was shown that plasticity index and generally the contact properties of two-process surfaces depended not only on plateau but also in a smaller degree on valley roughness. The method of estimation of summit radius of plateau surface from the analysis of two-process surface was presented too.
ThomasTRRosenB-G. Determination of the optimum sampling interval for rough contact mechanics. Tribol Int2000; 33: 601–610.
7.
GreenwoodJA. A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear2006; 261: 191–200.
8.
HirstWHollanderAE. Surface finish and damage in sliding. Proc R Soc (Lond)1974; 337A: 379–394.
9.
PoonCYSaylesRS. The classification of rough surface contacts in relation to tribology. J Phys D Appl Phys1992; 25: A249–256.
10.
GreenwoodJATrippJH. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng1970–1971; 185: 625–633.
11.
AbbottEJFirestoneFA. Specifying surface quality – a method based on accurate measurement and comparison. Mech Eng1933; 55: 569–569.
12.
PullenJWilliamsonJBP. On the plastic contact of rough surfaces. Proc R Soc (Lond)1972; A327: 159–173.
13.
ChangWREtsionIBogyDB. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. ASME J Tribol1987; 109: 257–263.
14.
ZhaoYMaiettaDMChangL. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. ASME J Tribol2000; 20: 86–93.
15.
KogutLEtsionI. Elastic–plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. ASME J Appl Mech2002; 69: 657–662.
16.
KogutLEtsionT. A finite element based elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. Tribol Trans2003; 46: 383–390.
17.
JacksonRLGreenI. A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. ASME J Tribol2005; 127: 343–354.
18.
JacksonRLGreenI. A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol Int2006; 39: 906–914.
19.
CohenOKligermanYEtsionI. A model for contact and static friction of nominally flat rough surfaces under full stick contact condition. ASME J Tribol2008; 130: 031401–031401.
20.
Mc CoolJI. Extending the capability of the Greenwood Williamson microcontact model. ASME J Tribol2000; 122: 496–502.
21.
YuNPolycarpouAA. Contact of rough surfaces with asymmetric distribution of asperity heights. ASME J Tribol2002; 124: 367–376.
22.
JengY-RPengS-R. Elastic-plastic contact behavior considering asperity interactions for surface with various height distributions. ASME J Tribol2006; 128: 245–251.
23.
MalburgMCRajaJ. Characterization of surface texture generated by plateau-honing process. CIRP Ann1993; 42: 637–640.
24.
ZipinRB. The analysis of profile strata for surface texture specification. Appl Surf Sci1983; 15: 334–360.
25.
WhitehouseDJ. Assessment of surface finish profiles produced by multi-process manufacture. Proc Inst Mech Eng1985; 199: 263–270.
26.
Sanna Reddy H, Raja J and Chen K. Characterization of surface texture generated by multi-process manufacture. In: Transactions of the 7th international conference on metrology and properties of engineering surfaces, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1997, pp.111–118.
27.
PawlusPGrabonW. The method of truncation parameters measurement from material ratio curve. Precis Eng2008; 32: 342–347.
28.
CodgellJD. A convolved multi-Gaussian probability distribution for surface topography application. Precis Eng2008; 32: 34–46.
29.
PawlusP. Simulation of stratified surface topography. Wear2008; 264: 457–463.
30.
CampbellJC. Cylinder bore surface roughness in internal combustion engines: its appreciation and control. Wear1972; 19: 163–166.
31.
JengY. Impact of plateaued surfaces on tribological performance. Tribol Trans1996; 39: 354–361.
32.
GrabonWPawlusPSepJ. Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribol Int2010; 43: 1882–1892.
33.
DzierwaAPawlusPZelaskoW. The study of the tribological properties of one-process and two-process surfaces after vapour blasting and lapping using pin-on-disc tester. Key Eng Mater2013; 527: 217–222.
34.
LeefeSE“Bi-Gaussian” representation of worn surface topography in elastic contact problems. In: DowsonD (eds). Tribology for energy conservation, Elsevier, 1998, pp. 281–290.
35.
Tomanik E. Modelling the asperity contact area on actual 3D surfaces. SAE Paper 2005-01-1864.
36.
Dimkovski Z. Surfaces of honed cylinder liners. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2011.
37.
WuJJ. Simulation of rough surfaces with FFT. Tribol Int2000; 33: 47–58.
38.
PawlusPZelaskoW. The importance of sampling intervals in contact mechanics. Wear2012; 276: 121–129.
39.
PawarGPawlusPEtsionI. The effect of determining topography parameters on analyzing elastic contact between isotropic rough surfaces. ASME J Tribol2013; 135/1: 011401–011401.
40.
NayakPR. Random process model of rough surfaces. ASME J Lubr Technol1971; 93: 398–407.
41.
ZelaskoWPawlusPDzierwaA. Experimental investigation of plastic contact between a rough steel surface and a flat sintered carbide surface. Tribol Int2016; 100: 141–151.
42.
Pawlus P and Chetwynd DG. 3-D surface texture xharacterisation of cylinder bores. In: IX international colloquium on surfaces, Chemnitz, 29–31 January 1996, pp.473–484.
43.
BhushanBMajumdarA. Elastic–plastic contact model for bifractal surfaces. Wear1992; 153: 53–64.
44.
RosenB-GOhlssonRThomasTR. Nano metrology of cylinder bore wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf1998; 39: 519–527.
45.
PawlusPChetwyndDG. Efficient characterization of surface topography in cylinder bores. Precis Eng1996; 19: 164–174.
46.
KucharskiSStarzyńskiG. Study of contact of rough surfaces: modeling and experiment. Wear2014; 311: 167–179.
47.
GreenwoodJAWuJJ. Surface roughness and contact: an apology. Mechanica2001; 36: 617–630.
48.
WuJJ. The properties of asperities of real surfaces. ASME J Tribol2001; 123: 872–883.
49.
BigerelleMNiangaJMNajjarD. Roughness signature of tribological contact calculated by a new method of peaks curvature radius estimation on fractal surfaces. Tribol Int2013; 65: 235–247.
