Opposing narratives about children’s digital media use: a critical discourse analysis of online public advice given to parents in Australia and Belgium

Abstract

What are the public discourses about parental guidance of children’s digital media use in Australia and Belgium? The findings of a multi-method interpretive content analysis suggest that both risks and opportunities are made significant, (re-)claiming power for parents to decide what is realistic. Belgian critical-optimistic commentary suggests that it is normal to see a variety of parenting practices in society, encouraging parents to make informed decisions considering the child’s developmental age and mutual trust. Australian public commentary features emotionally laden, opposing views, whereby restriction seems the golden rule for guiding young children’s engagement with digital media. Across the 30 months of the dataset, however, Australian pieces began to give voice to experts who embrace more relaxed rules. The study illuminates how public narratives are sites of political manoeuvring, revealing ideological stances relating to parental mediation and children’s media use, sensitive to and reflective of situated meanings bound by space and time.

Keywords

children digital media discourse analysis narratives parental mediation public advice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACMA (2008) Developments in Internet Filtering Technologies and Other Measures for Promoting Online Safety. Second Annual Report to the Minister for Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy, p. 133. Australian Communications and Media Authority. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20190313064756/https://acma.gov.au/-/media/Research-and-Analysis/Information/pdf/developments_in_internet_filters_2ndreport-pdf.pdf?la=en; https://www.acma.gov.au/-/media/Research-and-Analysis/Information/pdf/developments_in_internet_filters_2ndreport-pdf.pdf?la=en (accessed 17 April 2020).

Ahuvia

(2001) Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research 54(2): 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011087813505

Altheide

(2002) Children and the discourse of fear. Symbolic Interaction 25(2): 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2002.25.2.229

Anderson

(2015) While you might judge me, this parenting trick is my saviour. Mamamia, January 16. Available at: https://www.mamamia.com.au/ipads-bad-for-toddlers-yes-please/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

Anderson

(2016) Experts warn giving your child an iPad to calm a tantrum stunts their development. Mamamia, March 19. Available at: https://www.mamamia.com.au/experts-warn-giving-your-child-an-ipad-to-calm-a-tantrum-stunts-their-development/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

Asare-Donkoh

(2017) Children in the media: how much space do they get in Ghanaian newspapers? Journal of Children and Media 11(4): 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1348370

Barassi

(2016) Contested visions: digital discourses as empty signifiers from the ‘network’ to ‘big data.’ Communication and the Public 1(4): 423–435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316680220

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Belgian Data Protection Authority (2019) Mag ik als ouder de smartphone / tablet van mijn kinderen nakijken? Available at: https://www.ikbeslis.be/ouders-leerkrachten/smartphones-apps/ouderlijke-controle (accessed 15 April 2019).

10.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589–597. DOI:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.

12.

Bulger

Burton

O’Neill

, et al. (2017) Where policy and practice collide: comparing United States, South African and European Union approaches to protecting children online. New Media & Society 19(5): 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686325

13.

Carlton

(2015) Giving iPads to babies is child abuse, says doctor, 23 September. Available at: https://kidspot.com.au/baby/real-life/in-the-news/giving-ipads-to-babies-is-child-abuse-says-doctor/news-story/6462c3596ca54bce4817caf065cba735 (accessed 29 August 2018).

14.

Chambers

(2012) The changing nature of childhood. In: Chambers

(ed.) A Sociology of Family Life: Change and Diversity in Intimate Relations. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp. 76–93.

15.

Council on Communications and Media (2011) Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics 128(5): 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1753

16.

Council on Communications and Media (2016) Media and young minds. Pediatrics 138(5): e20162591. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591

17.

De Smet

(2017) Een oproep aan alle ouders: stop met games te demoniseren, 12 May. Available at: https://datanews.knack.be/ict/nieuws/een-oproep-aan-alle-ouders-stop-met-games-te-demoniseren/article-opinion-851779.html (accessed 14 September 2018).

18.

Domoff

Miller

Khalatbari

, et al. (2017) Maternal beliefs about television and parental mediation in a low-income United States sample. Journal of Children and Media 11(3): 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1339102

19.

Dor

(2015) Screen time sure crime. The Cairns Post, 5 December 5, p 11.

20.

Drotner

(1999) Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica 35(3): 593–619.

21.

Esser

Vliegenthart

(2017) Comparative research methods. In: Matthes

(ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0035

22.

Field

(2015) Tablets blamed for increase in children’s eye problems. ABC News, 10 July. Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-10/lack-time-outdoors-more-ipad-blamed-childrens-eye-problems/6594522 (accessed 27 August 2018).

23.

Foley

Sutton

Wiseman

, et al. (2018) International Digital Economy and Society Index 2018 (No. SMART 2017/0052), p. 79. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/international-digital-economy-and-society-index-2018 (accessed 14 April 2019).

24.

Gee

(2011) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.

25.

Giddens

(1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Available at: http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=2664 (accessed 27 December 2017).

26.

Gielkens

(2015) Mag ik op de Ipad mama? 10 tips tabletgebruik kids, 1 October. Available at: https://www.leukewereld.be/2017/2015/10/mag-ik-op-de-ipad-mama-10-tips-voor-tabletgebruik-bij-kleuters/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

27.

Gielkens

(2016) Een kind sus je niet met een iPad, 2 November. Available at: https://www.leukewereld.be/2017/2016/11/een_kind_sus_je_niet_met_een_ipad/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

28.

Graham

(2011) The product of text and ‘other’ statements: discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(6): 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00698.x

29.

Harkness

Blom

Oliva

, et al. (2007) Teachers’ ethnotheories of the ‘ideal student’ in five western cultures. Comparative Education 43(1): 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060601162438

30.

Hartley

(2015) Babies ‘benefit from iPads at a young age’: study, 23 June. Available at: http://www.essentialbaby.com.au/baby/education-play/babies-benefit-from-ipads-at-a-young-age-study-20150623-ghv6ki (accessed 14 September 2018).

31.

Hsieh

H-F

Shannon

(2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.

32.

Jensen

(2016) Parent-pressure: a history of parents as co-consumers of children’s media. Nordicom Review 37(1): 29–42.

33.

Kammerl

Kramer

(2016) The changing media environment and its impact on socialization processes in families. Studies in Communication Sciences 16: 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.04.004

34.

Lambrecht

(2017) Schermtijd kinderen – Geen beperking – Geen Grenzen – Mama ABC, 3 March. Available at: https://sofielambrecht.be/schermtijd-kinderen/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

35.

Livingstone

Third

(2017) Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: an emerging agenda. New Media & Society 19(5): 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318

36.

Lonne

Gillespie

(2014) How do Australian print media representations of child abuse and neglect inform the public and system reform? Stories place undue emphasis on social control measures and too little emphasis on social care responses. Child Abuse & Neglect 38(5): 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.04.021

37.

Loughran

(2015) A rethink on screen ban for kids under two, 30 October. http://www.essentialbaby.com.au/toddler/education-play/a-rethink-on-screen-ban-for-kids-under-two-20151030-gkmu9p (accessed 14 September 2018).

38.

Macenaite

(2017) From universal towards child-specific protection of the right to privacy online: dilemmas in the EU General Data Protection Regulation. New Media & Society 19(5): 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686327

39.

McLauchlan

(2016) The pros and cons of kids using tablets. The Northern Star, 13 January, p. 6.

40.

Masceroni

Holloway

(2017) The Internet of toys: a report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. Report no. COST Action IS1410, p. 60. Available at: http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IoToys-June-2017-reduced.pdf (accessed 18 January 2018).

41.

Mascheroni

Ólafsson

(2014) Net Children Go Mobile Risks and Opportunities, 2nd edn. Milano: Educat, p. 124.

42.

Mavoa

(2018) Advising on screen time in Australia: is the evidence up to the task, 18 April. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/parenting4digitalfuture/2018/04/18/advising-on-screen-time-in-australia/ (accessed 12 April 2019).

43.

Mavoa

Gibbs

Carter

(2017) Constructing the young child media user in Australia: a discourse analysis of Facebook comments. Journal of Children and Media 11(3): 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1308400

44.

Mostmans

(2016) Internet mediation and the family gap: explorative ethnographic interviews in new family forms in Belgium. Journal of Children and Media 10(4): 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1222298

45.

Nabi

Krcmar

(2016) It takes two: the effect of child characteristics on U.S. parents’ motivations for allowing electronic media use. Journal of Children and Media 10(3): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1162185

46.

nbn (2015) Top tips on technology and toddlers, 24 July. Available at: https://www.nbnco.com.au/blog/health/top-tips-on-technology-and-toddlers.html (accessed 14 September 2018).

47.

Nowell

Norris

White

, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

48.

Orlando

(2015) The problem with kids and technology, 23 August. Available at: https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2015/08/the-problem-with-kids-and-technology/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

49.

Raghavan

Harkness

Super

(2010) Parental ethnotheories in the context of immigration: Asian Indian immigrant and Euro-American mothers and daughters in an American Town. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41(4): 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110362629

50.

Rhodes

(2015). Top ten child health problems: what the public thinks. RCH National Child Health Poll. Available at: www.rchpoll.org.au/ (accessed 27 December 2017).

51.

Saldaña

(2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

52.

Seiter

(2008) Practicing at home: computers, pianos, and cultural capital. In: McPherson

(ed.) Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, pp. 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262633598.027

53.

Stiles

(2015) Child’s play: you should buy your toddler an iPad, 22 December. Available at: https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/tech/2015/12/22/buy-toddler-ipad/ (accessed 27 July 2018).

54.

Sugden

(2015) Sorry, Kate Winslet. You’re right, but I won’t keep my kids off screens, 3 November. Available at: http://www.mamamia.com.au/entertainment/kate-winslet-bans-social-media/ (accessed 14 September 2018).

55.

Symons

Ponnet

Walrave

, et al. (2017) A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents’ internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 73: 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004

56.

Third

Bellerose

Dawkins

, et al. (2014) Children’s Rights in the Digital Age: A Download from Children around the World. Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre. Available at: http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/753447/Childrens-rights-in-the-digital-age.pdf (accessed 17 April 2020).

57.

Trueltzsch-Wijnen

Aliagas

(2017) New techs, new fears? A look at historical discourses around children and technologies. Report no. Cost Action IS1410, pp. 12–14. Available at: http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IoToys-June-2017-reduced.pdf (accessed 17 April 2018).

58.

United Nations (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx (accessed 17 April 2020).

59.

Van Audenhove

Mariën

Vanwynsberghe

(2018) Media literacy policy in Flanders Belgium: from parliamentary discussions to public policy. Journal of Media Literacy Education 10(1): 59–81.

60.

Warren

(2016) ‘Someday you’ll have children just like you’: what tomorrow’s parents can teach us about parental mediation research. Journal of Children and Media 10(2): 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1130733

61.

Willett

(2015) The discursive construction of ‘good parenting’ and digital media – the case of children’s virtual world games. Media, Culture & Society 37(7): 1060–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715591666

62.

Wyness

(2012) Children’s participation and intergenerational dialogue: bringing adults back into the analysis. Childhood 20(4): 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212459775

63.

Zaman

Nouwen

Vanattenhoven

, et al. (2016) A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240