This article presents the results of a study using Q-methodology to identify and compare different learning styles between video production and media studies undergraduate courses. Three groups emerged from the video production course compared to four groups from a previous study. These two sets of groups were compared. Results demonstrate distinctions and similarities between the different learning styles that emerged from the two types of courses. The article concludes that the use of Q-methodology can deepen understanding of students’ learning preferences and improve instruction through more balanced and learner-focused curricular approaches.
BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. F.VyeN. J.SherwoodR. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C.Facer IIR. L. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 6(3), 254–264.
3.
BrownS. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
BrownS. R. (1991). Q-methodology Retrieved 30October2014, from http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/qarchive/primer1.html
5.
BrownS. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561–567.
6.
BrownS. R. (1999, May). Subjective behavior analysis. Paper read at a panel on ‘The Objective Analysis of Subjective Behavior: William Stephenson’s Q Methodology’, at the 25th anniversary annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.
7.
BrownS. R.DurningD. W.SeldenS. (1998). Q methodology. In MillerG. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 599–636). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
8.
CassidyS. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444.
9.
CerbinB. (2009). Assessing how students learn. Retrieved 7March2009, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/sub.asp?key=245&su.bkey=2882
10.
CoffieldF.MoseleyD.HallE.EcclestoneK. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 education: A systematic and critical review. London: The Learning and Skills Research Centre. Retrieved 4February2012, from http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
11.
CuillierD.SchwalbeC. B. (2010). GIFTed teaching: A content analysis of 253 great ideas for teaching awards in journalism and mass communication education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 65(1), 22–39. doi: 10.1177/107769581006500104
12.
CurryL. (1987). Integration concepts of cognitive or learning Style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa, ON: Canadian College of Health Service Executives.
13.
DanielsonS. (2009). Q method and surveys: Three ways to combine Q and R. Field Methods, 20(10), 1–19.
14.
DelahoussayeM. (2002). The perfect learner: An expert debate on learning styles. Training, 39(5), 28–36.
15.
DennisK. E.GoldbergA. P. (1996). Weight control self-efficacy types and transitions affect weight-loss outcomes in obese women. Addictive Behaviors, 21(1), 103–116.
16.
du PlooyG. M. (2006). Bridging the chasm between theory and research/practice in communication science: A challenge in higher education. Communicare, 25(2), 62–84.
17.
EntwistleN. J. (2005, September5–7). Ways of thinking and ways of teaching across contrasting subject areas. Paper presented at the ISL 2005 Conference, Improving Student Learning by Assessment, London. Retrieved 30October2014, from http://www.academia.edu/3427348/Ways_of_thinking_and_ways_of_teaching_across_contrasting_subject_areas
FelderR. M.SilvermanR. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. Retrieved 5May2011, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.774&rep=rep1&type=pdf[withupdatedauthorpreface(2002)].
20.
FelderR. M.SpurlinJ. (2005). Applications reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103–112.
21.
GardnerH. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
22.
GreenoJ.CollinsA.ResnickL. (1996). Cognition and learning. In BerlinerD.CalfeeR. (Eds), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
23.
HallR. T.JensenR. R.McLeanD. D. (2008). Designing for the student: Users’ styles and department web sites. Innovate, 5(1). Retrieved 24February2012, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=416
24.
HallR. T.JensenR. R.McLeanD. D. (2013). Learning in the Geoscience classroom: Q-Methodology, learning styles, and individual preferences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(1), 120–128.
25.
HallE.MoseleyD. (2005). Is there a role for learning styles in personalized education and training?International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 24(3), 243–255.
26.
HarrisL. V. A.SadowskiM. S.BirchmanJ. A. (2009). A comparison of learning style models and assessment instruments for university graphics educators. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 70(1). Retrieved 29September2012, from http://www.edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ/article/view/44
27.
HendryG. D.HeinrichP.LyonP. M.BarrattA. L.SimpsonJ. M.HydeS. J.GonsalkoraleS.HydeM.MgaiethS. (2005). Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study self-efficacy, preference for group work and group climate. Educational Psychology, 25(4), 395–407.
28.
HerrmannN. (1989). The creative brain: Insights into creativity, communication, management, education, and self-understanding. Lake Lure, NC: Brain Books.
29.
HoagA. M.BhattacharyaS. S.HelselJ.HuY.LeeS.KimJ.KimS.MichaelP. W.ParkC.SagerS.SeoS.StarkC.YeoB. (2002). A literature review of computers and pedagogy for journalism and mass communication education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57(4), 398–412. doi: 10.1177/107769580205700408
30.
JacobsonS. W.Aaltio-MarjosolaI. (2001). Strong objectivity and the use of Qmethodologyin cross-cultural research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(3), 228–246.
31.
JoyS.KolbD. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style?International Journal of Cultural Relations, 33(1), 69–85.
32.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
33.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
KolbD. A. (1985). Learning style inventory and technical manual. Boston: McBer & Company.
35.
LitzingerT. A.LeeS. H.WiseJ. C.FelderR. M. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 309–319.
36.
LynnM. J. (2009). Learning orientations: Diversity in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 195–208.
37.
MiddlehurstR. (2008). Not enough science or not enough learning? Exploring the gaps between leadership theory and practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 322–339.
38.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
ParsonsP. (2003). A need for reform to align practice with values. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 58(3), 214–218.
40.
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkD. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
41.
PierceC. S. (1955). The law of mind. In BuchlerJ. (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Pierce (pp. 339–353). Dover, NY: Dover Publications.
42.
RajeshR.PugazhendhiS.GaneshK.DucqYvesLenny KohS. C. (2012). Generic balanced scorecard framework for third party logistics service provider. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 269–282. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.040.
43.
RhodesL.RoesnerA. (2009). Teaching magazine publishing through experiential learning. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 63(4), 303–316.
44.
RidingR. J.CheemaI. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3&4), 193–215.
45.
RobbinsP.KruegerR. (2000). Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. Professional Geographer, 52(4), 636–648.
46.
SandbrookC.ScalesI.ViraB.AdamsW. (2010). Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology, 25(2), 285–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010. 01592.x
47.
SterigouD.AireyD. (2011). Q-methodology and tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 311–322.
48.
VermuntJ. D.VerloopN. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 257–280.
49.
WaldeckJ. H. (2006). What does ‘personalized education’ mean for faculty, and how should it serve our students?Communication Education, 55(3), 345–352.
50.
WiggerU.MrtekR. G. (1994). Use of Q-technique to examine attitudes of entering pharmacy students toward their profession. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 58(1), 8–15.
