Instructors, challenged by traditional student learning, desire to gain a deeper
understanding of how students learn. Utilization of Q-method provides an effective
methodology to improve instructor understanding of human subjectivity. This research
depicts how Q-methodology can provide the educator a rich tool to identify and assess
student learning styles. This paper reports the adaptation of an existing learning styles
instrument to a Q-method analysis in three upper-division communication classes. Four
learning groups emerged from the analysis: Global Conceptualizer, Verbal Learner,
Realistic Visualizer, and Ambiguous Conceptualizer. These four learning groups are
discussed with implications for teaching and learning. The paper concludes that the use of
Q-method can deepen understanding of students’ learning preferences by strengthening
existing approaches of learning styles and improve instructor understanding of
students.
BransfordJ.D.FranksJ.F.VyeN.J.SherwoodR.D. (1989).
New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be
told. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (eds), Similarity and
Analogical Reasoning (pp. 470–497).
New York: Cambridge University
Press.
2.
BrewerG.A.SeldenS.C.Facer IIR.L. (2000).
Individual conceptions of public service motivation.
Public Administration Review, 60,
254–264.
3.
BrownS.R. (1980).
Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political
science. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
4.
BrownS.R. (1991).
Q-methodology. Retrieved March6, 2013 from
http://facstaff.uww.edu/cottlec/qarchive/primer1.html
5.
BrownS.R. (1996).
Q-methodology and qualitative research.
Qualitative Health Research, 6,
561–567.
6.
BrownS.R. (1999,
May). Subjective behaviour analysis. Paper
read at the ‘The Objective Analysis of Subjective Behavior: William Stephenson’s Q
Methodology’. Panel presented at the 25th Anniversary Annual Convention
of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago,
IL.
7.
BrownS.R.DurningD.W.SeldenS. (1998).
Q methodology. In MillerG. (ed.), Handbook of
Research Methods in Public Administration (pp.
599–636). New York, NY:
Marcel Dekker, Inc.
8.
CassidyS. (2004).
Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and
measures. Educational Psychology, 24,
419–444.
9.
CerbinB. (2009).
Assessing How Students Learn. Retrieved
March7, 2009 from
http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/sub.asp?key=245&su.bkey=2882
10.
CoffieldF.MoseleyD.HallE.EcclestoneK. (2004).
Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 education: A systematic and
critical review. The Learning and Skills Research
Centre, London. Retrieved
February4, 2012 from
http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
11.
CurryL. (1983).
An organisation of learning style theory and constructs.
In CurryL. (ed.), Learning styles in
continuing education (pp. 115–131).
Halifax: Dalhausie
University.
12.
CurryL. (1987).
Integration concepts of cognitive or learning Style: A review with attention to
psychometric standards. Ottawa, ON:
Canadian College of Health Service
Executives.
13.
DanielsonS. (2009).
Q method and surveys: Three ways to combine Q and R.
Field Methods, 20(10),
1–19.
14.
diSessaA. (1985).
Learning about knowing. In KleinE. L. (ed.), Children and
Computers. New directions for child development, (pp.
94–124). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
15.
DelahoussayeM. (2002).
The perfect learner: An expert debate on learning styles.
Training, 39(5),
28–36.
16.
DervinB. (2003).
Human studies and user studies: A call for methodological
inter-disciplinarity. Information Research,
9(1) paper 166. Retrieved January9, 2012 from
http://InformationR.net/ir/9-1/paper166.html
17.
DeweyJ. (1900). The
school and society. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
18.
DriverD.JetteK.LiraL. (2008).
Student learning identities: developing a learning taxonomy for the
political science classroom. Journal of Political Science
Education, 4, 61–85.
19.
DweckC.S.BernpechatJ. (1983).
Children’s theories of intelligence. In ParisS.G.OlsonG. M.StevensonH. W. (Eds.), Learning and
motivation in the classroom, (pp. 239–256).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
20.
DwyerK.K. (1998).
Communication apprehension and learning style preference: Correlations
and implications for teaching. Communication Education,
47(2), 137–151.
21.
EntwistleN.J. (2005,
Sep5–7) Ways of thinking and ways of teaching across contrasting subject
areas. Paper presented at the ISL 2005 Conference, Improving Student Learning by
Assessment, London. Retrieved from
http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html#measurement
22.
EntwistleN.J.PetersonE.R. (2004)
Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships
with study behaviour and influences of learning environments.
International Journal of Educational Research, 41,
407–428.
23.
FelderR.M. (1993).
Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science
education. Journal of College Science Teaching,
23(5), 286–290.
24.
FelderR.M.BrentR. (2001).
Effective strategies for cooperative learning.
Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching,
10(2), 69–75.
FelderR.M.SilvermanR.K. (1988).
Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.
Engineering Education, 78(7),
674–681. Retrieved May5, 2011 from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.774&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[with updated author preface (2002)].
27.
FelderR.M.SolomanB.A. (2011)
Learnings styles and strategies. Retrieved
May4, 2011 from
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.htm
28.
FelderR.M.SpurlinJ. (2005).
Applications reliability and validity of the index of learning
styles. International Journal of Engineering Education,
21(1), 103–112.
29.
GardnerH. (1999).
Intellligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.
New York: Basic
Books.
30.
HallR.T.JensenR.R.McLeanD.D. (2008).
Designing for the student: Users’ styles and department web
sites. Innovate, 5(1).
Retrieved on 24February2012 from
http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=416
31.
HallE.MoseleyD. (2005).
Is there a role for learning styles in personalised education and
training?International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 24,
243–255.
32.
HendryG.D.HeinrichP.LyonP.M.BarrattA.L.SimpsonJ.M.HydeS.J.GonsalkoraleS.HydeM.MgaiethS. (2005).
Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study
self-efficacy, preference for group work and group climate.
Educational Psychology, 24,
395–407.
33.
JacobsonS.W.Aaltio-MarjosolaI. (2001).
Strong’ objectivity and the use of Q-methodology in cross-cultural
research. Journal of Management Inquiry,
10, 228–246.
34.
JonassenD.H.GrabowskiB.L. (1993).
Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum
Associates.
35.
KirschnerP.A.SwellerJ.ClarkR.E. (2006).
Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the
failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based
teaching. Educational Psychologist,
41, 75–86.
36.
KolbD.A. (1984).
Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
LitzingerT.A.LeeS.H.WiseJ.C.FelderR.M. (2007).
A psychometric study of the Index of Learning Styles.
Journal of Engineering Education, 96,
309–319.
40.
LiuC. (2008).
An empirical research of e-learners’ learning styles by
Q-Methodology. International Journal of Innovation and
Learning, 5, 633–650.
41.
LynnM.J. (2009).
Learning orientations: Diversity in higher education.
Learning and Individual Differences,
19(2), 195–208.
42.
ManochehriNick-Naser. (2008).
Individual learning style effects on student satisfaction in a web-based
environment. International Journal of Instructional
Media, 35, 221–228,
43.
McKeownB.F.ThomasT.B. (1988).
Q-methodology: Quantitative applications in the social sciences.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
44.
PerryW.G., Jr. (1970).
Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years:
A scheme. New York:
Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
45.
PiagetJ. (1952). The
origin of intelligence in children. New York:
International University Press.
46.
PierceC.S. (1955).
The law of mind. In BuchlerJ. (ed.), Philosophical
writings of Pierce (pp. 339–353).
Dover, NY: Dover
Publications.
47.
PrawatR.S. (1992).
Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist
perspective. American Journal of Education,
100, 354–395.
48.
PooleJ. (2006).
E-learning and learning styles: Students’ reactions to web-based language
and style at Blackpool and The Fylde College. Language &
Literature, 15,
307–320.
49.
PotterW.J.EmanuelR. (1990).
Students’ preferences for communication styles.
Communication Education, 39,
234–249.
50.
RajeshR.PugazhendhiS.GaneshK.YvesDucqLenny KohS.C. (2012).
Generic balanced scorecard framework for third party logistics service
provider. International Journal of Production
Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.040.
51.
RidingR.J.CheemaI. (1991).
Cognitive styles: An overview and integration.
Educational Psychology, 14,
193–215.
52.
RitterF.E.FreedA.R.HaskettO.L.M. (2005).
Discovering user information needs: The case of university department Web
sites. Interactions,
12(5), 19. Retrieved from
http://ritter.ist.psu.edu/papers/ritterFH05.pdfArchivedathttp://www.webcitation.org/5YWrT7m0P
53.
RobbinsP.KruegerR. (2000).
Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q Method in human
geography. Professional Geographer,
52, 636–648.
54.
SharpJulie E. (1997,
June). Applying Kolb communication style theory in the
communication classroom. Business Communication
Quarterly, 60(2),
129–134.
55.
SimonsP.R.J. (1993).
Constructive learning: The role of the learner. In
DuffyT.M.LowyckJ.JonassenD.H. (eds), Designing
environments for constructive learning (pp.
291–314). New York:
Springer Verlag.
56.
SkinnerB.F. (1957).
Verbal behavior. New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
57.
StephensonW. (1969).
Foundations of communication theory.
Psychological Record, 19,
65–82.
58.
VermuntJ.D. (1994).
Inventory of learning styles in higher education: Scoring key for the inventory
of learning styles in higher education. Tilburg,
Netherlands: Tilburg University Department of
Educational Psychology.
59.
VermuntJ.D. (1998).
The regulation of constructive learning processes.
The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68,
149–171.
60.
VermuntJ.D. (2005).
Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual
factors and academic performance. Higher Education,
49, 205–234.
61.
VermuntJ.D.VerloopN. (1999).
Congruence and friction between learning and teaching.
Learning and Instruction, 9,
257–280.
62.
WeblerT.DanielsonS.TulerS. (2009). Using
Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research.
Greenfield, MA: 3 Social and
Environmental Research Institute. Retrieved November8, 2011 from
www.seri-us.org/pubs/Qprimer.pdf
63.
WiggerU.MrtekR.G. (1994).
Use of Q-technique to examine attitudes of entering pharmacy students
toward their profession. American Journal of Pharmaceutical
Education, 58, 8–15.
64.
ZophyJ.W. (1982).
On learner-centered teaching. The History
Teacher, 15, 185–196.
65.
ZwynoM.S. (2003).
A contribution of validation of some meaning for Felder-Soloman’s index
of learning styles. Proceedings from the 2003 Annual ASEE
Conference and Exposition.
