Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines U.S. college public relations (PR) students’ perspectives on the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on PR careers using Q methodology. The 36-statement Q sample was developed around four constructs from the extended technology acceptance model. Q sorts from 37 undergraduate PR students yielded two distinct factors. The first reflected optimism about generative AI’s role in PR, while the second expressed concern about its use. Both factors agreed that generative AI will serve as a supplementary tool and rejected the idea that it is difficult to use.

Keywords

public relations Q method mixed methods journalism and mass communication education journalism & mass communication programs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agrawal

(2024). Towards adoption of generative AI in organizational settings. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 64(5), 636–651.

AI media monitoring: Revolutionizing content tracking in the digital age. (n.d.). Cision. https://www.cision.com/resources/insights/ai-media-monitoring/

Albayati

(2024). Investigating undergraduate students’ perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203.

Alkaissi

McFarlane

S. I.

(2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2).

Banasick

(2023). Ken-Q analysis (Version 2.0.1) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8310377

Bonar

Slaughter

Keary

Davies

(2024). Supporting students with English as an additional language during emergency remote teaching: A Q methodology study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1–22.

Bonilla

(2025, June 28). Three winning DM9 campaigns are withdrawn from Cannes Lions, as festival pledges tighter oversight. AdAge. https://adage.com/events-awards/cannes-lions/aa-dm9-withdraws-three-campaigns/

Brown

(2004). Illuminating patterns of perception: An overview of Q methodology. In Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative (pp. 1–5).

Brown

S. F.

(1986). Q technique and method. In Berry

W. D.

Lewis-Beck

M. S.

(Eds.), New Tools for Social Scientists. Sage.

10.

Brown

S. R.

(1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.

11.

Brown

S. R.

(2005). Applying Q methodology to empowerment. Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. The World Bank.

12.

Cascella

Montomoli

Bellini

Bignami

(2023). Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: An analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4

13.

Casteleijn

Uys

du Plooy

Buys

Lister

H. E.

de Bruyn

(2024). Occupational adaptation of occupational therapists in a global crisis: Lessons learned from a Q-methodology study. Journal of Occupational Science, 31(4), 687–703.

14.

Chan

C. K. Y.

(2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43.

15.

ChatGPT Education. (n.d.). Columbia University Information Technology. https://www.cuit.columbia.edu/content/chatgpt-education?utm_source=chatgpt.com

16.

Chatterjee

Rana

N. P.

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Baabdullah

A. M.

(2021). Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120880.

17.

Chung

Kinsey

D. F.

(2019). An examination of consumers’ subjective views that affect the favorability of organizational logos: An exploratory study using Q methodology. Corporate Reputation Review, 22(3), 89–100.

18.

Cusnir

Nicola

(2024). Using generative Artificial Intelligence tools in public relations: Ethical concerns and the impact on the profession in the Romanian context. Communication & Society, 309–323.

19.

Danielson

Webler

Tuler

S. P.

(2009). Using Q method for the formative evaluation of public participation processes. Society & Natural Resources, 23(1), 92–96.

20.

Davis

F. D.

(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.

21.

Dinnar

Einav

(2024). “Newsers”: News repertoires and news perceptions among Israeli youth in the digital age. Communication Studies, 75(6), 918–942.

22.

Duckett

Westrick

N. M.

(2025). Exploring the use, adoption, and ethics of generative artificial intelligence in the public relations and communication professions. Communication Teacher, 39(1), 33–41.

23.

Eapen

Finkenstadt

Folk

Venkataswamy

(2023, July). How generative AI can augment human creativity. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/07/how-generative-ai-can-augment-human-creativity

24.

Fui-Hoon Nah

Zheng

Cai

Siau

Chen

. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304.

25.

Global Comms Report. (2024). https://www.cision.com/resources/guides-and-reports/2024-global-comms-report/

26.

Guo

Zhu

Wang

Shu

(2024). Tourists’ adoption of extended reality technologies: A meta-analytical structural equation modeling. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(3), 450–463.

27.

Gursoy

Chi

O. H.

Nunkoo

(2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169.

28.

Guzman

A. L.

Lewis

S. C.

(2024). What generative AI means for the media industries, and why it matters to study the collective consequences for advertising, journalism, and public relations. Emerging Media, 2(3), 347–355.

29.

Howes

(2025). Creating a prompt library: Applying generative AI skills to public relations practice. Journal of Public Relations Education, 11(1), 71–83.

30.

Kelleher

O’Malley

(2005). Applying the technology acceptance model to assess outcomes in a globally linked strategic communication project. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 60(4), 402–414.

31.

Kemp

(2025, June 27). DM9’s Grand Prix withdrawn as Cannes lions pledges to introduce AI safeguards. AdAge. https://www.adweek.com/agencies/cannes-lions-revokes-dm9s-grand-prix-will-introduce-ai-safeguards/

32.

Kenthapadi

Lakkaraju

Rajani

(2023, August). Generative AI meets responsible AI: Practical challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 5805–5806). ACM.

33.

Lim

Y. J.

(2024). Revolutionizing campus communications: The power of ChatGPT in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Education, 10(2), 91–129.

34.

Liu

Henseler

Liu

(2022). What makes tourists adopt smart hospitality? An inquiry beyond the technology acceptance model. Digital Business, 2(2), 100042.

35.

Louis

Nah

(2023). A systematic review of scholarship in AI and communication research (1990-2022). In Research handbook on artificial intelligence and communication. Edward Elgar Publishing.

36.

Manis

K. T.

Choi

(2019). The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware. Journal of Business Research, 100, 503–513.

37.

Marr

(2023, July 24). The Difference between generative AI and traditional AI: An easy explanation for anyone. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/07/24/the-difference-between-generative-ai-and-traditional-ai-an-easy-explanation-for-anyone/

38.

Mauldin

C. R.

(1980). Closing the gap between communication research and communication. Operant Subjectivity, 3(3), 83–108.

39.

Mazid

Wallace

Chen

Choi

(2024). Exploring key drivers for embracing artificial intelligence in public relations pedagogy. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 1–22.

40.

McKeown

Thomas

D. B.

(2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384412

41.

McKinsey. (2023). Generative AI and the future of work in America. Which jobs will be in demand? Which ones are shrinking? And which ones could be hardest to fill? https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-work-in-america

42.

Mehra

Paul

Kaurav

R. P. S.

(2021). Determinants of mobile apps adoption among young adults: Theoretical extension and analysis. Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(5), 481–509.

43.

Microsoft & Accenture. (2024). The economic potential of generative AI in the United States. https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/11/21/the-3-8-trillion-opportunity-unlocking-the-economic-potential-of-the-us-generative-ai-ecosystem/

44.

Microsoft Copilot at UC. (n.d.). University of Cincinnati. https://www.uc.edu/about/ucit/software-tools/ai/tools/copilot.html

45.

MITxPRO. (2024, October 22). Exploring the shift from traditional to generative AI. https://curve.mit.edu/exploring-shift-traditional-generative-ai

46.

Muck Rack. (2025). New Muck Rack Report reveals generative AI is now essential for PR professionals. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/16/3011030/0/en/New-Muck-Rack-Report-Reveals-Generative-AI-Is-Now-Essential-for-PR-Professionals.html

47.

Munoz-Leiva

Climent-Climent

Liébana-Cabanillas

(2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(1), 25–38.

48.

New Generative AI Available: Gemini. (2025, July 15). University of Minnesota. https://it.umn.edu/news-alerts/news/new-generative-ai-available-gemini

49.

Nutsugah

Senanu

(2024). On the tech trek and industrial revolutions: Unravelling the impact of generative AI on public relations praxis in Africa. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(4), 341–359.

50.

E. J.

(2024). Can we build a relationship through artificial intelligence (AI)? Understanding the impact of AI on organization-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 50(4), 102469.

51.

Paige

J. B.

Morin

K. H.

(2016). Q-sample construction: A critical step for a Q-methodological study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 38(1), 96–110.

52.

Panda

Upadhyay

A. K.

Khandelwal

(2019). Artificial intelligence: A strategic disruption in public relations. Journal of Creative Communications, 14(3), 196–213.

53.

Papakostas

Troussas

Krouska

Sgouropoulou

(2023). Exploring users’ behavioral intention to adopt mobile augmented reality in education through an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(6), 1294–1302.

54.

Phaneuf

(2020, February 12). 7 real examples of brands and businesses using chatbots to gain an edge. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/business-chatbot-examples

55.

Pillai

Sivathanu

Metri

Kaushik

(2024). Students’ adoption of AI-based teacher-bots (T-bots) for learning in higher education. Information Technology & People, 37(1), 328–355.

56.

PRSA. (2023). PRSA releases guidance on artificial intelligence. https://www.prsa.org/news/2023/11/20/prsa-releases-guidance-on-artificial-intelligence

57.

Rafique

Almagrabi

A. O.

Shamim

Anwar

Bashir

A. K.

(2020). Investigating the acceptance of mobile library applications with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers & Education, 145, 103732.

58.

Ramlo

(2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28–45.

59.

Rane

(2023). ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence (AI) for smart industry: Role, challenges and opportunities for industry 4.0, industry 5.0 and society 5.0. Challenges and Opportunities for Industry, 4.

60.

Rese

Baier

Geyer-Schulz

Schreiber

(2017). How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 306–319.

61.

Ronge

Maier

Rathgeber

(2025). Towards a definition of generative artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 38(1), 31.

62.

Ryan

(2024). Generative AI in the classroom: Teaching a critical skill for the public relations writing student. Journal of Public Relations Education, 9(3), 25–45.

63.

Salzano

Ashby-King

D. T.

(2025). Examining proposed generative AI integrations in public relations: Offering participatory (AI) public relations. Public Relations Inquiry.

64.

Schiavo

Businaro

Zancanaro

(2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence. Technology in Society, 77, 1–13.

65.

Sedkaoui

Benaichouba

(2024). Generative AI as a transformative force for innovation: A review of opportunities, applications and challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management.

66.

Shabila

N. P.

Al-Tawil

N. G.

Al-Hadithi

T. S.

Sondorp

(2014). Using Q-methodology to explore people’s health seeking behavior and perception of the quality of primary care services. BMC Public Health, 14, 1–9.

67.

Stickl

J. E.

Wester

K. L.

Wachter Morris

C. A.

(2019). Making sense of subjectivity: Q methodology in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 106–118.

68.

Tarantola

(2023, November 30). How OpenAI’s ChatGPT has changed the world in just a year. Engadget. https://www.engadget.com/openai-became-the-nexus-of-the-technology-world-in-2023-143010513.html

69.

Tefertiller

Vasquez

Brammer

(2025). The kids are alright: Examining how US public relations students ethically navigate artificial intelligence. Journal of Public Relations Education, 11(1), 8–42.

70.

UF GPT: Microsoft Copilot. (n.d.). UF Information Technology. https://it.ufl.edu/ai/microsoft-copilot/

71.

Understanding AI Literacy. (n.d.). Stanford University. https://teachingcommons.stanford.edu/teaching-guides/artificial-intelligence-teaching-guide/understanding-ai-literacy

72.

Vizcaíno

García

Villar

J. C.

Piattini

Portillo

(2013). Applying Q-methodology to analyse the success factors in GSD. Information and Software Technology, 55(7), 1200–1211.

73.

Vujnovic

Kruckeberg

Swiatek

Galloway

(2025). AI regulation and ethical considerations surrounding the use of artificial intelligence in PR: The need for transparency and accountability. In Public relations and the rise of AI (pp. 77–93). Routledge.

74.

Watts

Stenner

(2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Sage.

75.

Webler

Danielson

Tuler

(2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Social and Environmental Research Institute. http://www.seri-us.org/sites/default/files/Qprimer.pdf

76.

Wolf

Good

J. M.

Brown

S. R.

Cuppen

E. H.

Ockwell

Watts

(2011). Q methodology and its applications: Reflections on theory. Operant Subjectivity, 35(1).

77.

Wright

(2023, March 20). Coke launches “create real magic” AI art contest using GPT-4 and Dall-E 2. The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2023/03/20/coke-launches-create-real-magic-ai-art-contest-using-gpt-4-and-dall-e

78.

Yang

(2025). Preparing public relations’ practitioners for the AI era: Advancing pedagogical principles in public relations’ artificial intelligence education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(1), 3–24.

79.

Yue

C. A.

Men

L. R.

Mitson

Davis

D. Z.

Zhou

(2024). Artificial intelligence for internal communication: Strategies, challenges, and implications. Public Relations Review, 50(5), 102515.

80.

Zlateva

Steshina

Petukhov

Velev

(2024). A conceptual framework for solving ethical issues in generative artificial intelligence. In Electronics, communications and networks (pp. 110–119). IOS Press.

Generative AI Through the Eyes of Aspiring PR Professionals in the United States: A Q-Methodology Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References