Understanding the influence of music-social projects on students’ well-being is a growing area of research. This study examines the effects of Musiquem, a school-based music-social initiative implemented in a primary school in Spain, with the aim of (1) analysing its impact on students’ social well-being and (2) exploring the factors influencing students’ satisfaction with the programme. Seventy-five students (33 girls and 42 boys) from third to sixth grade (ages 8–12-years-old) participated in the study over the course of one academic year. The project was implemented during regular school hours through twice-weekly, 1-hr sessions. Activities included group instrumental learning (violin and cello), body percussion, singing, dancing, soundpainting, and collaborative music-making. The project was delivered jointly by schoolteachers and musicians-in-residence and included Service Learning components in which students designed and carried out socially oriented artistic actions. A mixed-methods research approach was used, with quantitative data collected through the Students’ Social Well-being at School (ESCODAD) scale and qualitative data collected through the “Student Satisfaction Dossier,” which included a one-to-ten satisfaction scale and seven open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (independent sample t-tests, p < .05, Hedge’s g for effect sizes), and qualitative data analysed inductively and thematically using MaxQDA. Results indicated significant improvements in various factors of social well-being, with stronger effects in solidarity and coexistence. Although not originally hypothesised, younger students showed greater gains. Students expressed high satisfaction, particularly valuing active participation and collaborative music-making. This study contributes to the growing literature on music education and well-being. The findings encourage further development and evaluation of music-social projects as tools for fostering inclusion, empathy, and meaningful community engagement through music.
Arriaga-SanzC.Macián-GonzálezR.Cabedo-MasA.MolinerL. (2022). Toquemos juntos! Motivación e interacción en el aula en iniciativas musicales comunitarias [Let’s play together! Motivation and classrrom interaction in community music initiatives]. Revista Música Hodie, 22, e69312. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v22.69312
2.
AzpiazuL.Fernández-ZabalaA.Rodríguez-FernándezA.Ramos-DíazE. (2023). Perceived emotional intelligence and subjective well-being during adolescence: The moderating effect of age and sex. Current Psychology, 42(35), 31048–31063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04128-1
3.
BakerG. (2021). Rethinking social action through music: The search for coexistence and citizenship in Medellín’s music schools. Open Book Publishers.
4.
BarrettM. S.SmigielH. M. (2007). Children’s perspectives of participation in music youth arts settings: Meaning, value and participation. Research Studies in Music Education, 28(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X070280010204
5.
BartleetB.-L.SunderlandN.CarfootG. (2016). Enhancing intercultural engagement through service learning and music making with Indigenous communities in Australia. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16667863
6.
BosV.HanR.WiebuschF.BroughtonM. C.DingleG. A. (2024). UQ voices: Building a community choir for international students following the global pandemic. Australian Voice, 25, 16–29.
Cabedo-MasA.Díaz-GómezM. (2013). Positive musical experiences in education: Music as a social praxis. Music Education Research, 15(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.763780
9.
Cabedo-MasA.Moliner-MiravetL.Campayo-MuñozE.Macián-GonzálezR.Arriaga-SanzC. (2023). Impact of group music-making on social development: A scoping review. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 46(2), 352–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2023.2173384
10.
Cabedo-MasA.Puerto-SánchezM. J.Macián-GonzálezR.Moliner MiravetL. (2020). Making music to investigate our neighbourhood: The Musiquem program. In Vicente-ÁlvarezR. M.GillandersC.Rodríguez-RodríguezJ.RomanelliG.PittJ. (Eds.), Music education and didactic materials (pp. 257–264). Grupo STELLAE/IARTEM.
11.
CampbellP. S. (2018). Music, education, and diversity: Building cultures and communities. Teachers College Press.
12.
CenteioE. E.SomersC. L.MooreE. W. G.GarnA.KulikN.MartinJ.ShenB.McCaughtryN. (2020). Considering physical well-being, self-perceptions, and support variables in understanding youth academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(1), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431619833493
13.
CheungA. C. K.SlavinR. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615
14.
Chiva-BartollO.MolinerM. L.Salvador-GarcíaC. (2020). Can service-learning promote social well-being in primary education students? A mixed method approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, Article 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104841
15.
Chiva-BartollO.Salvador-GarciaC.Fernando-FelixS.Cabedo-MasA. (2019). Service learning in musical education: Literature review and recommendations for practice. Revista Electronica Complutense de Investigacion en Educacion Musical-Reciem, 16, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5209/reciem.62409
16.
ClarkV. L. P.CreswellJ. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. SAGE.
17.
CreechA.VarvarigouM.HallamS. (2020). Contexts for music learning and participation: Developing and sustaining musical possible selves. Springer Nature.
18.
CrookeA. H. D.McFerranK. S. (2014). Recommendations for the investigation and delivery of music programs aimed at achieving psychosocial wellbeing benefits in mainstream schools. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 15–37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061963.pdf
19.
CroomA. M. (2015). Music practice and participation for psychological well-being: A review of how music influences positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. Musicae Scientiae, 19(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864914561709
20.
D’AlexanderC.IlariB. (2016). Social transformation of two students in an El Sistema-inspired orchestra program. Revista Internacional de Educacion Musical, 4, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.12967/RIEM-2016-4-p075-084
21.
Dell’AnnaS.PellegriniM.IanesD. (2021). Experiences and learning outcomes of students without special educational needs in inclusive settings: A systematic review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(8), 944–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1592248
22.
DemirbatirR. E. (2015). Relationships between psychological well-being, happiness, and educational satisfaction in a group of university music students. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(15), 2198–2206. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2375
23.
DillonS. (2006). Assessing the positive influence of music activities in community development programs. Music Education Research, 8(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800600779543
24.
DumbrillR.UrbainO.de FlorenceB. (2010). Building solidarity through musical improvisations: Let the children sing [Conference session]. Music for a Universal Consciousness of Solidarity, Tunisia. https://toda.org/assets/files/events/2010/Dumbril%20English.pdf
ElliottD. J. (1993). On the values of music and music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 1, 81–93.
28.
FaulknerS.WoodL.IveryP.DonovanR. (2012). It is not just music and rhythm . . . Evaluation of a drumming-based intervention to improve the social wellbeing of alienated youth. Children Australia, 37(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2012.5
29.
ForbesM.DingleG. A.AitchesonN.PowellC. (2025). From music performance to prescription: A guide for musicians and health professionals. Music & Science, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043251338013
30.
Fuentealba-UrraS.Rubio-RiveraA.González-CarrascoM.OyanedelJ. C.Céspedes-CarrenoC. (2021). The moderating role of sociodemographic factors in the relationship between physical activity and subjective well-being in Chilean children and adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), Article 11190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111190
31.
GillA.RickardN. S. (2012). Non-musical benefits of school-based music education and training. In RickardN. S.McFerranK. (Eds.), Lifelong engagement with music: Benefits for mental health and well-being (pp. 57–72). Nova Science Publishers.
32.
Giráldez-HayesA.Cabedo-MasA.Arriaga-SanzC. (2022). A veces lloro, pero son lágrimas de alegría: percepciones de bienestar psicológico a partir la práctica musical compartida [Sometimes I cry, but they are tears of joy: Perceptions of psychological well-being from shared musical practice]. Encuentros. Revista de Ciencias Humanas, Teoría Social y Pensamiento Crítico, 15, 250–266.
33.
HallamS.CreechA.VarvarigouM. (2017). Well-being and music leisure activities through the lifespan. In MantleR.SmithG. D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of music making and leisure (pp. 31–60). Oxford University Press.
34.
HallamS.HimonidesE. (2022). The power of music: An exploration of the evidence. Open Book Publishers.
HebertD. G.SaetherE. (2014). “Please, give me space”: Findings and implications from an evaluation of the GLOMUS intercultural music camp, Ghana 2011. Music Education Research, 16(4), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.851662
37.
HendersonS.CainM.IstvandityL.LakhaniA. (2017). The role of music participation in positive health and wellbeing outcomes for migrant populations: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 45(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616665910
38.
IlariB. (2018). Musical parenting and music education: Integrating research and practice. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123317717053
KallioA. A.WesterlundH.KarlsenS.MarshK.SætherE. (2021). The politics of diversity in music education. Springer Nature.
41.
Kandiko HowsonC.MatosF. (2021). Student surveys: Measuring the relationship between satisfaction and engagement. Education Sciences, 11(6), Article 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060297
42.
KawaseS.OgawaJ. I.ObataS.HiranoT. (2018). An investigation into the relationship between onset age of musical lessons and levels of sociability in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 415916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02244
43.
KirkpatrickD. L.KirkpatrickJ. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
44.
KoehlerF.NeubauerA. B. (2020). From music making to affective well-being in everyday life: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(4), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.25657/02:23091
45.
KokotsakiD.HallamS. (2007). Higher education music students’ perceptions of the benefits of participative music making. Music Education Research, 9(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800601127577
46.
LeeJ.KrauseA. E.DavidsonJ. W. (2017). The PERMA well-being model and music facilitation practice: Preliminary documentation for well-being through music provision in Australian schools. Research Studies in Music Education, 39(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X17703131
47.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102(1), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X506831
48.
LopesE.Berbel-GomézN.Díaz-GómezM. (2021). Connecting networks through percussion: Rhythm as an inclusive practice in socio-educational projects. Musica Hodie, 21, Article e69364. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v21.69364
49.
LuJ.HallingerP. (2018). A mirroring process: From school management team cooperation to teacher collaboration. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 238–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1278242
50.
MaorD.MitchemK. (2020). Hospitalized adolescents’ use of mobile technologies for learning, communication, and well-being. Journal of Adolescent Research, 35(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417753953
51.
MarshK.DieckmannS. (2017). Contributions of playground singing games to the social inclusion of refugee and newly arrived immigrant children in Australia. Education 3-13, 45(6), 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1347128
52.
MayorgaE.PicowerB. (2018). Active solidarity: Centering the demands and vision of the Black Lives Matter movement in teacher education. Urban Education, 53(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917747117
53.
McFerranK. (2010). Music for wellbeing in Australian schools. White paper. Executive summary. The University of Melbourne.
54.
MikulyukA. B.BraddockJ. H. (2018). K-12 school diversity and social cohesion: Evidence in support of a compelling state interest. Education and Urban Society, 50(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516678045
55.
MinorsH. J. (2020). Soundpainting: A tool for collaborating during performance. In BlainM.MinorsH. (Eds.), Artistic research in performance through collaboration (pp. 113–138). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38599-6_7
56.
MolinerL.AlegreF.Cabedo-MasA.Chiva-BartollO. (2021). Social well-being at school: Development and validation of a scale for primary education students. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 800248. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.800248
57.
NguyenJ.FergusonG. M. (2019). A global cypher: The role of hip hop in cultural identity construction and navigation for Southeast Asian American youth. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 164, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20279
58.
NikulaE.JärvinenT.LaihoA. (2020). The contradictory role of technology in Finnish young people’s images of future schools. Young, 28(5), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308819894806
59.
NobleT.McGrathH. (2008). The positive educational practices framework: A tool for facilitating the work of educational psychologists in promoting pupil wellbeing. Educational and Child Psychology, 25(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2008.25.2.119
OdenaO. (2023). The role of music in social projects: An introduction to its wellbeing benefits. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 27(3), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-01-2023-0013
62.
Oriola-RequenaS.Calderón-GarridoD.GustemsJ. (2023). Life satisfaction and adolescent music making: A comparison of youth choirs and bands in Spain. Musicae Scientiae, 27(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649211021458
63.
PangH. (2018). WeChat use is significantly correlated with college students’ quality of friendships but not with perceived well-being. Heliyon, 4(11), Article e00967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00967
RickardN. S.AppelmanP.JamesR.MurphyF.GillA.BambrickC. (2013). Orchestrating life skills: The effect of increased school-based music classes on children’s social competence and self-esteem. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411434824
66.
RickardN. S.McFerranK. (2012). Lifelong engagement with music: Benefits for mental health and well-being. Nova Science Publishers.
67.
RodriguezL. V. (2023). From the iron cage to “La Jaula de Oro”: Music as a cultural object. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 33(6), 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2740
68.
Rodríguez-SánchezA.Cabedo-MasA. (2021). Changes in the social fabric of victims of the armed conflict in Colombia based on an analysis of their sound environments. Musicae Scientiae, 26(3), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864921997515
69.
RoseD. C.HeatonP.BartoliA. J. (2015). Changes in the wellbeing of children starting to learn to play musical instruments. Assessment & Development Matters, 7(1), 26–30.
70.
SarazinM. (2017). Can student interdependence be experienced negatively in collective music education programmes? A contextual approach. London Review of Education, 15(3), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.3.11
71.
SlobodaJ., et al. (2020). Music for social impact: An overview of context, policy and activity in four countries, Belgium, Colombia, Finland, and the UK. Finnish Journal of Music Education, 23(1–2), 1–32.
72.
SolhaugT.OslerA. (2018). Intercultural empathy among Norwegian students: An inclusive citizenship perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1357768
73.
StantonA.ZandvlietD.DhaliwalR.BlackT. (2016). Understanding students’ experiences of well-being in learning environments. Higher Education Studies, 6(3), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n3p90
74.
StemlerS. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
75.
TreacyD. S.WesterlundH. (2019). Shaping imagined communities through music: Lessons from the School Song practice in Nepal. International Journal of Music Education, 37(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419850251
76.
TurinoT. (2008). Music as social life: The politics of participation. University of Chicago Press.
77.
VelosoA. L. (2016). Más allá de la Orquestra Geração: El retrato de Manuela, una joven que soñaba con ser clarinetista profesional [Beyond the Orquestra Geração: The Manuela’s portrait, a youngster who dreamt with becoming a professional clarinetist]. Revista Internacional de Educación Musical, 4, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.12967/RIEM-2016-4-p095-103
78.
WeerasingheI. S.FernandoR. L. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533–539.
79.
WeinbergM. K.JosephD. (2017). If you’re happy and you know it: Music engagement and subjective wellbeing. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616659552
80.
WrightR. (2012). Music education and social transformation: Building social capital through music. The Canadian Music Educator, 53(3), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.22176/act15.4.127
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
