Music performance is an intensive sensorimotor task that involves the generation of mental representations of musical information that are actively accessed, maintained, and manipulated according to the demands of the performance. Internal representations and external information interact through feedback and feedforward processes that adjust the musician’s motor behavior to optimize a musical performance. This study aimed to examine the relationship between altered sensory feedback and performance errors. Seventeen experienced pianists aged between 33 and 54 years performed Hanon Exercise N°1 from memory under four different conditions: (1) normal (normal sensory feedback); (2) closed fallboard (altered haptic and auditory feedback); (3) blindfolded (altered visual feedback); and (4) combined (blindfolded and closed fallboard; altered haptic, auditory, and visual feedback). Performance errors were quantified based on a video analysis of the performances. Results indicated that compared with normal performance, participants made significantly more note errors in the blindfolded condition and more bar-adding errors per trial in the closed fallboard condition. The comparison between the normal condition and the three altered sensory feedback conditions revealed the impact of altering sensory feedback in musical performance. These findings are discussed in the context of music learning.
AnggoroR. R. M. K. M.KaryawantoH. Y. (2020, December3). Study of Dalcroze’eurhythmics concept on Hanon fingering etude in developing piano core skill. In International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (pp. 561–566). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.098
3.
AscherslebenG. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1304
4.
BachP.FrankC.KundeW. (2022). Why motor imagery is not really motoric: Towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w
5.
BangertM.AltenmüllerE. O. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neuroscience, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-4-26
6.
BantonL. J. (1995). The role of visual and auditory feedback during the sight-reading of music. Psychology of Music, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735695231001
7.
BishopL.BailesF.DeanR. T. (2012). Musical imagery and the planning of dynamics and articulation during performance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2013.31.2.97
BishopL.BailesF.DeanR. T. (2014). Performing musical dynamics: How crucial are musical imagery and auditory feedback for expert and novice musicians?Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2014.32.1.51
10.
BishopL.GoeblW. (2017). Music and movement: Musical instruments and performers. In AshleyR.TimmersR. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to music cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2013.31.2.97
11.
BlancaM. J.ArnauJ.López-MontielD.BonoR.BendayanR. (2013). Skewness and kurtosis in real data samples. Methodology, 92(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000057
12.
BoutinA.DoyonJ. (2020). A sleep spindle framework for motor memory consolidation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1799), Article 20190232. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0232
BrownR. M.PalmerC. (2013). Auditory and motor imagery modulate learning in music performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00320
15.
ChenQ.BeatyR. E.QiuJ. (2020). Mapping the artistic brain: Common and distinct neural activations associated with musical, drawing, and literary creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 41(12), 3403–3419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25025
16.
ChengF. P. H.GroßbachM.AltenmüllerE. O. (2013). Altered sensory feedbacks in pianist’s dystonia: The altered auditory feedback paradigm and the glove effect. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00868
17.
CohenS.BodnerE. (2019). Music performance skills: A two-pronged approach–facilitating optimal music performance and reducing music performance anxiety. Psychology of Music, 47(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618765349
18.
CouchmanJ. J.BeasleyR.PfordresherP. Q. (2012). The experience of agency in sequence production with altered auditory feedback. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.10.007
19.
DieterK. C.HuB.KnillD. C.BlakeR.TadinD. (2014). Kinesthesis can make an invisible hand visible. Psychological Science, 25(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613497968
20.
EldridgeM.SaltzmanE.LahavA. (2010). Seeing what you hear: Visual feedback improves pitch recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903316136
21.
EngelA.BangertM.HorbankD.HijmansB. S.WilkensK.KellerP. E.KeysersC. (2012). Learning piano melodies in visuo-motor or audio-motor training conditions and the neural correlates of their cross-modal transfer. Neuroimage, 63, 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.038
22.
FinneyS. A. (1997). Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Perception, 15(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285747
23.
FinneyS. A.PalmerC. (2003). Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196082
FuruyaS.SoechtingJ. F. (2010). Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2307-2
GoeblW.PalmerC. (2008). Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance. Experimental Brain Research, 186(3), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1252-1
28.
HanonC. L. (1911). The virtuoso pianist: In sixty exercises for the piano (Vol. 1). G. Schirmer.
29.
HasegawaT.MatsukiK. I.UenoT.MaedaY.MatsueY.KonishiY.SadatoN. (2004). Learned audio-visual cross-modal associations in observed piano playing activate the left planum temporale. An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(3), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.005
30.
HeldingL. (2020). The musician’s mind: Teaching, learning, and performance in the age of brain science. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
31.
HighbenZ.PalmerC. (2004). Effects of auditory and motor mental practice in memorized piano performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 159, 58–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319208
32.
HodgesD.ThautM. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of music and the brain. Oxford University Press.
33.
HommelB.MüsselerJ.AscherslebenG.PrinzW. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
34.
KellerP. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance: Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252(1), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06439
35.
KellerP. E.KochI. (2008). Action planning in sequential skills: Relations to music performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601160864
36.
KulpaJ. D.PfordresherP. Q. (2013). Effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on sequence production. Experimental Brain Research, 224, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3289-z
37.
LappeC.LappeM.KellerP. E. (2018). The influence of pitch feedback on learning of motor-timing and sequencing: A piano study with novices. PLOS ONE, 13(11), Article e0207462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207462
38.
LedermanS. J.KlatzkyR. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1439
39.
MadeiraR. M.dos SantosR. A. T. (2022). The effects of sensory deprivations during the initial practice of short piano pieces: An experiment with four students at different academic levels. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211002242
40.
MaidhofC.PitkäniemiA.TervaniemiM. (2013). Predictive error detection in pianists: A combined ERP and motion capture study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00587
41.
Nunes-SilvaM.JanzenT. B.RodriguesR. G.LuzA. R. D. (2021). Sensory feedback in music performer–instrument interactions. Psychology of Music, 49(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620928397
42.
OdendaalA. (2019). Individual differences between the practicing behaviors of six pianists: A challenge to Perceptual Learning Style theory. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18774365
43.
OldratiV.FinisguerraA.AvenantiA.AgliotiS. M.UrgesiC. (2021). Differential influence of the dorsal premotor and primary somatosensory cortex on corticospinal excitability during kinesthetic and visual motor imagery: A low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Sciences, 11(9), Article 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091196
44.
PenhuneV. B. (2019). Musical expertise and brain structure: The causes and consequences of training. In ThautM. H.HodgesD. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music and the brain (pp. 417–438). Oxford Library of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198804123.013.17
45.
PfordresherP. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1331–1345. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1331
46.
PfordresherP. Q. (2008). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of transition-based similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 708–725. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.708
47.
PfordresherP. Q.BeasleyR. T. (2014). Making and monitoring errors based on altered auditory feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00914
48.
PfordresherP. Q.ChowK. (2019). A cost of musical training? Sensorimotor flexibility in musical sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 967–973. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1535-5
49.
PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC. (2002). Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance. Psychological Research, 66(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260100075
50.
PfordresherP. Q.MantellJ. T.BrownS.ZivadinovR.CoxJ. L. (2014). Brain responses to altered auditory feedback during musical keyboard production: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1556, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.004
51.
PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC. (2006). Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(3), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193683
52.
ReppB. H. (1999). Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. Music Perception, 16(4), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285802
53.
RileyK.CoonsE. E.MarcarianD. (2005). The use of multimodal feedback in retraining complex technical skills of piano performance. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2005.2016
54.
RuizM. H.StrübingF.JabuschH. C.AltenmüllerE. (2011). EEG oscillatory patterns are associated with error prediction during music performance and are altered in musician’s dystonia. Neuroimage, 55(4), 1791–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.050
55.
ShinY. K.ProctorR. W.CapaldiE. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020541
WesseldijkL. W.MosingM. A.UllénF. (2021). Why is an early start of training related to musical skills in adulthood? A genetically informative study. Psychological Science, 32(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620959014
59.
WöllnerC.WilliamonA. (2007). An exploratory study of the role of performance feedback and musical imagery in piano playing. Research Studies in Music Education, 29(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X07087567
60.
WolpertD. M.DoyaK.KawatoM. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1238
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
