Involuntary semantic memories are a new topic in psychology. Initial research has suggested that musical memories are a dominant type of involuntary memory. Interestingly, no comprehensive information exists on the commonality of “earworms”, or repeated involuntary imagery of music (INMI), and its relationship to the engagement with musical activities. The present study investigated these using cross-sectional, retrospective reports from a questionnaire study that was conducted among Finnish internet users (N = 12,519). The analyses of the data revealed that 89.2% of participants reported experiencing this phenomenon at least once a week. The amount of music practice and listening was positively related to the frequency of involuntary music. Women reported elevated levels of involuntary imagery episodes in contrast to men, who reacted differently. In older age-groups the frequency of the incidents decreased among both sexes. People with extensive musical practice history seemed to experience longer musical segments and more often instrumental ones. They were less agitated by involuntary music and reported it less often. The results are discussed in relation to a memory-based hypothesis of involuntary musical imagery. In conclusion, INMI is viewed as an integral part of our musical mind.
BailesF. (2007). The prevalence and nature of imagined music in the everyday lives of musical students. Psychology of Music, 35(4), 1–16.
2.
BarussI.WammesM. (2009). Characteristics of spontaneous musical imagery. Journal Of Consciousness Studies, 16(1), 37–61.
3.
BeamanC. P.WilliamsT. I. (2010). Earworms (‘stuck song syndrome’): Towards a natural history of intrusive thoughts. British Journal of Psychology, 101(4), 637–653.
4.
BennettS. (2003). Song stuck in your thoughts? Profiling musical imagery repetition (MIR). Paper presented at Society for Music Perception and Cognition Conference 2003, University of Nevada, USA, 17 June.
5.
BrodskyW.KesslerY.RubinsteinB. S.GinsborgJ.HenikA. (2008). The mental representation of music notation: Notational audiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 427–445.
6.
BrownB. (2006). The perpetual music track. The phenomenon of constant musical imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(6), 25–44.
CopeT. E.BaguleyD. M. (2009). Is musical hallucination an otological phenomenon? A review of the literature. Clinical Otolaryngology, 34(5), 423–430.
9.
DattatreyaN. M.ChittaranjanA. (2009). Musical obsession: Repeated auditory imagery of a cell phone ring tone. Psychiatry And Clinical Neurosciences, 63(4), 591–592.
10.
EversS.EllgerT. (2004). The clinical spectrum of musical hallucinations. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 227(1), 55–65.
11.
FreudS. (1911). The interpretation of dreams. 3rd translated edition (BrillA. A., Trans.): Plain Label Books.
12.
HalpernA. R.ZatorreR. J. (1999). When that tune runs through your head: A PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. Cerebral Cortex, 9(7), 697–704.
HemmingJ. (2009). Zur Phänomenologie des “Ohrwurms”. In AuhagenW.BullerjahnC.HögeH. (Eds.), Musikpsychologie – Musikalisches Gedächtnis und musikalisches Lernen (Vol. 20, pp. 184–207). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15.
HermeshH.KonasS.ShilohR.DarR.MaromS.WeizmanA.. (2004). Musical hallucinations: Prevalence in psychotic and nonpsychotic outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 65(2), 191–197.
16.
HoningH.LadinigO. (2008). The potential of the internet for music perception research: A comment on lab-based versus Web-based studies. Empirical Musicology Review, 3.
KadoshR. C.HenikA. (2007). Can synaesthesia research inform cognitive science?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 177–184.
19.
KellarisJ. J. (2001). Identifying properties of tunes that get stuck in your head: Toward a theory of cognitive itch. Paper presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Winter 2001 Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
20.
KellarisJ. J. (2003). Dissecting earworms: Further evidence on the song-stuck-in-your-head phenomenon. Paper presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Winter 2003 Conference, New Orleans, LA.
21.
KvavilashviliL.MandlerG. (2004). Out of one’s mind: A study on involuntary semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 48(1), 47–94.
22.
LeaverA. M.Van LareJ.ZielinskiB.HalpernA. R.RauscheckerJ. P. (2009). Brain activation during anticipation of sound sequences. Journal Of Neuroscience, 29(8), 2477–2485.
23.
LiikkanenL. A. (forthcoming). Inducing involuntary musical imagery: An experimental study. Musicae Scientiae.
24.
LiikkanenM. (ed). (2009). Suomalainen vapaa-aika. Arjen ilot ja valinnat. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
25.
LotzeM.SchelerG.TanH. R.BraunC.BirbaumerN. (2003). The musician’s brain: Functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. Neuroimage, 20(3), 1817–1829.
26.
MaceJ. H. (2005). Experimentally manipulating the effects of involuntary conscious memory on a priming task. American Journal of Psychology, 118(2), 159–182.
27.
MaceJ. H. (ed). (2007). Involuntary memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
28.
MandlerG. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering wihtout really trying. In UmiltàC.MoscovitchM. (Eds.) Attention and performance, XV: Conscious and nonconscious information (Vol. XV, pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
McNally-GagnonA.HébertS.PeretzI. (2009). The obsessive song phenomenon: Induction, memory and emotions. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society of Music Perception and Cognition 2009.
30.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161–176.
31.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
32.
PraharajS. K.GoyalN.SarkarS.BagatiD.SinhaP.SinhaV. K. (2009). Musical obsession or pseudohallucination: Electrophysiological standpoint. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63(2), 230–234.
33.
RauscheckerJ. P. (2001). Cortical plasticity and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930(June), 330–336.
34.
ReikT. (1953). The haunting melody: Psychoanalytic experiences in life and music. New York: Farrar, Straus and Young.
35.
SacksO. (2007). Musicophilia: Tales of music and the brain. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36.
SchlagmanS.KliegelM.SchulzJ.KvavilashviliL. (2009). Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 397–411.
37.
SkitkaL. J.SargisE. G. (2006). The internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529–555.
38.
TeraoT.IkemuraN. (2000). Musical obsessions or hallucinations?Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 12(4), 518–519.
39.
Ukkola-VuotiL.OikkonenJ.OnkamoP.KarmaK.RaijasP.JarvelaI. (2011). Association of the arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A) haplotypes with listening to music. Journal of Human Genetics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/jhg.2011.1310.1038/jhg.2011.13.
40.
WegnerD. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52.
41.
WellsG. L.OlsonE. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 277–295.
42.
ZatorreR. J.HalpernA. R. (2005). Mental concerts: Musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron, 47(1), 9–12.
43.
Zungu-DirwayiN.HugoF.van HeerdenB. B.SteinD. J. (1999). Are musical obsessions a temporal lobe phenomenon?Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 11(3), 398–400.
