Enhancing our knowledge about students’ experiences during their studies in higher music education is essential to understand and support them as they cope with their specific workloads in studying music. This study provides a research-based understanding of what engaging in music means to music students when they reflected on their experiences of their studies and workloads. The data were collected from interviews with 29 students in higher music education institutions in Finland and the United Kingdom, and the analysis was conducted by following the framework of transcendental phenomenology. Music students’ experiences of their workload are connected in multifaceted ways to the meanings they ascribe to their engagement in music, such as intense and complex experiences that are also a source of vitality, their development as musicians, their creative self-expression, their interaction with others and in building a community, their personal growth and coping approaches during their studies, and the transcendental experiences they encounter during their engagement with music. Thus, the findings indicate that engaging in music is a holistic experience for music students. This study shows the importance of understanding and investing in music students’ unique workload experiences through research on the teaching and learning practices of higher music education institutions, which can in turn support music students’ well-being, learning, and future careers.
AlvessonM.SköldbergK. (2009). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
2.
BernhardH. C. (2007). A comparison of burnout between undergraduate music and non-music majors. Visions of Research in Music Education, 9–10, 1–13.
3.
BondeL. O.JuelK.EkholmO. (2018). Associations between music and health-related outcomes in adult non-musicians, amateur musicians and professional musicians—Results from a nationwide Danish study. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 27(4), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2018.1439086
BullA. (2019). Class, control, and classical music. Oxford University Press.
6.
BurnardP. (2012). Commentary: Musical creativity as practice. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 2 (pp. 319–336). Oxford University Press.
7.
CrawfordR. (2014). A multidimensional/non-linear teaching and learning model: Teaching and learning music in an authentic and holistic context. Music Education Research, 16(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.812627
8.
CreechA.GauntH. (2012). The changing face of individual instrumental tuition: Value, purpose and potential. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 1 (pp. 694–711). Oxford University Press.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). SAGE.
10.
CreswellJ. W.HansonW. E.Plano ClarkV. L.MoralesA. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
11.
DellE. M.VarpioL.PetrosoniakA.GajariaA.McCarthyA. E. (2014). The ethics and safety of medical student global health electives. International Journal of Medical Education, 5, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5334.8051
12.
HallamS.PapageorgiI. (2017). Conceptions of musical understanding. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16671037
13.
JääskeläinenT. (2021). Tuition fees, entrance examinations and misconceptions about equity in higher music education. Nordic Research in Music Education, 2(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v2.2803
14.
JääskeläinenT. (2022). Using a transcendental phenomenological approach as a model to obtain a meaningful understanding of music students’ experienced workload in higher education. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 23(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea23n6.
15.
JääskeläinenT.López-ÍñiguezG. (2022). Tools for teachers to support music students in managing and coping with their workload in higher education. Frontiers in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.895090
16.
JääskeläinenT.López-ÍñiguezG.LehikoinenK. (2022). Experienced workload, stress, and coping among professional students in higher music education: An explanatory mixed methods study in Finland and the United Kingdom. Psychology of Music. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211070325
17.
JääskeläinenT.López-ÍñiguezG.PhillipsM. (2020). Music students’ experienced workload, livelihoods and stress in higher education in Finland and the United Kingdom. Music Education Research, 22(5), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1841134
18.
JääskeläinenT.López-ÍñiguezG.PhillipsM. (2022). Music students’ experienced workload in higher education: A systematic review and recommendations for good practice. Musicae Scientiae. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221093976
19.
KokotsakiD.HallamS. (2007). Higher education music students’ perceptions of the benefits of participative music making. Music Education Research, 9(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800601127577
20.
KoopsL. H.KuebelC. R. (2019). Self-reported mental health and mental illness among university music students in the United States. Research Studies in Music Education, 43, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19863265
21.
LapidakiE.de GrootR.StagkosP. (2012). Communal creativity as sociomusical practice. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 2 (pp. 371–388). Oxford University Press.
LindströmE.JuslinP. N.BresinR.WilliamonA. (2003). “Expressivity comes from within your soul”: A questionnaire study of music students’ perspectives on expressivity. Research Studies in Music Education, 20(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X030200010201
24.
López-ÍñiguezG.BurnardP. (2022). Toward a nuanced understanding of musicians’ professional learning pathways: What does critical reflection contribute?Research Studies in Music Education, 44, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X211025850
25.
MikszaP.EvansP.McPhersonG. E. (2019). Wellness among university-level music students: A study of the predictors of subjective vitality. Musicae Scientiae, 25, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919860554
26.
Moerer-UrdahlT.CreswellJ. W. (2004). Using transcendental phenomenology to explore the “ripple effect” in a leadership mentoring program. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300202
27.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
28.
OdenaO. (2018). Developing conservatoire students’ creativity through musical dramatization. In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity revisited: Educational foundations, practices and research (pp. 65–79). Routledge.
29.
PapageorgiI.HaddonE.CreechA.MortonF.De BezenacC.HimonidesE.PotterJ.DuffyC.WhytonT.WelchG. (2010). Institutional culture and learning I: Perceptions of the learning environment and musicians’ attitudes to learning. Music Education Research, 12(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613801003746550
30.
ParkA.GuptillC.SumsionT. (2007). Why music majors pursue music despite the risk of playing-related injuries. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 22(3), 89–96.
31.
ParkesK. A.JonesB. D. (2012). Motivational constructs influencing undergraduate students’ choices to become classroom music teachers or music performers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411435512
32.
PerkinsR. (2013). Learning cultures and the conservatoire: An ethnographically-informed case study. Music Education Research, 15(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2012.759551
33.
PerkinsR.ReidH.AraújoL. S.ClarkT.WilliamonA. (2017). Perceived enablers and barriers to optimal health among music students: A qualitative study in the music conservatoire setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00968
34.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). Plenum Press.
35.
ReidA. (2001). Variation in the ways that instrumental and vocal students experience learning music. Music Education Research, 3(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800020029932
36.
ReimerM. U. (2010). Toward a holistic education. Journal of Performing Arts Leadership in Higher Education, 1, 32–49.
37.
ThorgersenC. F. (2010). Quality holistic learning in musikdidaktik from a student perspective: Where, when and how does it occur?Visions of Research in Music Education, 15(1), 1–29.
38.
UpitisR. B. (2012). Music and the arts: As ubiquitous and fundamental as the air we breathe. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 2 (pp. 689–693). Oxford University Press.
39.
UpitisR. B.AbramiP. C.VarelaW.KingM.BrookJ. (2017). Student experiences with studio instruction. Music Education Research, 19(4), 410–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1202221
40.
WebbM.SeddonF. A. (2012). Musical instrument learning, music ensembles, and musicianship in a global and digital age. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, volume 1 (pp. 752–768). Oxford University Press.
