In the context of advanced instrumental learning, this study had two purposes: to investigate the relationships of epistemic beliefs to first-year music students’ self-reported learning strategies in practising a musical instrument, and to examine the adaption of a measure of academic personal epistemology to the musical domain. One hundred and thirty music students (71 women and 59 men) from six music academies/conservatoires filled out questionnaires detailing their epistemic beliefs and strategy use. To some degree, the factor analysis showed cross-subject generalizability in the dimensions of epistemic beliefs in the music version of the original measure. The four dimensions found were: certainty of knowledge (α = .64); control of knowledge acquisition (α = .66); ambiguity of knowledge (α = .56); and simplicity of knowledge (α = .50). Beliefs about the control of knowledge acquisition and the simplicity of knowledge were significantly related to strategies, but the correlations were low. Gender and degree programme were also significantly related to epistemic beliefs.
BråtenI.StrømsøH. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565.
2.
BråtenI.StrømsøH. I.SamuelstuenM. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 814–840.
3.
BrymanA.CramerD. (1999). Quantitative data analysis with the SPSS release 8 for Windows. London: Routledge.
4.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.
5.
DeBackerT. K.CrowsonH. M.BeesleyA. D.ThomaS. J.HestevoldN. L. (2008). The challenge of measuring epistemic beliefs: An analysis of three self-report instruments. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 281–312.
6.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
7.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
8.
EricssonK. A.RoringR. W.NandagopalK. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18(1), 3–56.
9.
Garrett-IngramC. (1997, March). Something to believe in: The relationship between epistemological beliefs and study strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
10.
GinsborgJ. (2002). Classical singers learning and memorising a new song: An observational study. Psychology of Music, 30, 58–101.
11.
GrusonL. M. (1981). What distinguishes competence: An investigation of piano practising. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada.
12.
HallamS. (1992). Approaches to learning and performance of expert and novice musicians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, UK.
13.
HallamS. (2000). The development of performance planning strategies in musicians. In WoodsC.LuckG.BrochardR.SeddonF.SlobodaJ.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Keele: Keele University Department of Psychology.
14.
HoferB. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 129–163.
15.
HoferB. K.PintrichP. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
16.
MiklaszewskiK. (1989). A case study of a pianist preparing a musical performance. Psychology of Music, 17, 95–109.
17.
MillsJ. (2002). Conservatoire students’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective instrumental and vocal tuition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153(4), 78–82.
18.
MuisK. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190.
19.
NeberH.Schommer-AikinsM. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.
20.
NerlandM. (2004). Instrumental teaching as cultural practices [Instrumentalundervisning som kulturell praksis]. Oslo: NMH-publications2004, No 1.
21.
NielsenK. (1999). Musikalsk mesterlære [Musical apprenticeship]. In NielsenK.KvaleS. (Eds.), Mesterlære – Læring som sosial praksis (pp. 112–124). Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
22.
NielsenS. G. (1999a). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 275–91.
23.
NielsenS. G. (1999b). Regulation of learning strategies during practice. Psychology of Music, 27(2), 218–229.
24.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 155–167.
25.
PaulsenM. B.FeldmanK. A. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning. Journal of Staff, Program, & Organization Development, 16(2), 83–91.
26.
PaulsenM. B.WellsC. T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365–384.
27.
PerryW. P.Jr (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
28.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Technical Report No. 91-b-004.
29.
SchmittN. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353.
30.
SchneiderW.WeinertF. E. (1990). The role of knowledge, strategies, and aptitudes in cognitive performance: Concluding comments. In SchneiderW.WeinertF. E. (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 286–302). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
SchommerM. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.
32.
SchommerM. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411.
33.
SchommerM. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In GarnerR.AlexanderP. A. (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25–40). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
34.
Schommer-AikinsM.DuellO. K.BarkerS. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan’s classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 347–366.
35.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A. (1994). Is everyone musical?The Psychologist, 7, 349–354.
36.
SpiroR. J.FeltovichP. JCoulsonR. L. (1996). Two epistemic world-views: Prefigurative schemas and learning in complex domains. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S51–S61.
37.
WeinsteinC. E.MayerR. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In WittrockM.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: McMillan.
38.
ZimmermanB. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.
39.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73–86.
