While the interest in understanding how music affects an individual’s development is growing, the significance of music education for a more equal society has also been frequently discussed. In this study, we pay special attention to the potential for social capital that music learning, making, and experiencing offer. We report upon the reactions and feedback from the audience and performers in attendance at concerts organised by the Resonaari Centre for Music Education in 2012 and 2014. Our research is based on two online questionnaires and group discussions with the students, teachers, and audience members. The findings explicate the importance and benefits of music, music-making, and music education for student musicians with special educational needs and for their relatives, friends, and audience.
AdamekM. S.DarrowA. (2005). Music in special education (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: AMTA.
2.
BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (2015). Preface: Why social justice and music education. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 204–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
CheckJ. W.SchuttR. K. (2012). Research methods in education. London, UK: Sage.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DarrowA.-A.AdamekM. (2015). Preparing for the future: Music students with special education needs in school and community life. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 204–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
DeLorenzoL. (Ed.). (2015). Giving voice to democracy in music education: Diversity and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
DobbsT. (2012). A critical analysis of disabilities discourse in the Journal of Research in Music Education 1990–2011. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, (194), 7–30.
8.
DuffyS. (2006). Keys to citizenship: A guide to getting good support for people with learning disabilities. Birkenhead, UK: Paradigm Consultancy & Development Agency.
9.
Economidou StavrouN.StakelumM. (Eds.). (2015). European perspectives on music education, Volume 4: Every learner counts – democracy and inclusion in music education. Innsbruck, Austria: Helbling Verlag.
10.
FergusonK. M. (2006). Social capital and children’s wellbeing: A critical synthesis of the international social capital literature. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 2–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2397.2006.00575.x
11.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2017). Taiteen perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet: yleinen ja laaja oppimäärä 2017 [Curriculum for Basic Education in the Arts: The basic and advanced syllabus 2017]. Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland.
12.
HelliwellJ.PutnamR. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 1435–1446.
13.
HendricksD. R.WehmanP. (2009). Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorders: Review and recommendations. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 77–88.
14.
KarjalainenP. (2011). Gimme some respect [DVD]. Finland: Meguru Production.
KivijärviS.KaikkonenM. (2015). The role of Special Music Centre Resonaari in advancing inclusive music education in Finland. In Economidou StavrouN.StakelumM. (Eds.), European perspectives on music education, Volume 4: Every learner counts – democracy and inclusion in music education (pp. 229–240). Innsbruck, Austria: Helbling Verlag.
17.
KärkkäinenJ.PassiJ.-P. (2012). The Punk Syndrome [DVD]. Finland: Mouka Filmi Oy.
18.
KärkkäinenJ.PassiJ.-P. (2017). The Punk Voyage [Film]. Finland: Mouka Filmi Oy.
LangstonT. W.BarrettM. S. (2008). Capitalizing on community music: A case study of the manifestation of social capital in a community choir. Research Studies in Music Education, 30, 118–138. doi:10.1177/1321103X08097503
21.
MarzanoM. (2002). Informed consent. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 809–835). London, UK: Sage.
22.
NarayanD.CassidyM. F. (2001). A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: Development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current Sociology, 49(2), 59–102.
23.
NindM. (2008). Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: Methodological challenges (Working Paper: Project Report). Southampton, UK: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
24.
OckelfordA. (2000). Music in the education of children with several of profound learning difficulties: Issues in current UK provision, a new conceptual framework, and proposals for research. Psychology of Music, 28(2), 197–217.
25.
OckelfordA. (2012). Commentary: Special abilities, special needs. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of research in music education I (pp. 7–10). New York, NY: Oxford University.
26.
PesonenH.KontuE.PirttimaaR. (2015). Sense of belonging and life transitions for two females with autism spectrum disorder in Finland. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 18(2), 73–86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.9782/2159–4341–18.2.73
27.
PesonenH.KontuE.SaarinenM.PirttimaaR. (2016). Conceptions associated with sense of belonging in different school placements for Finnish pupils with special education needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(1), 59–75. doi:10.1080/08856257.2015.1087138
28.
PohjannoroU.PesonenM. (2009). Musiikkialan ammattilaisten ja harrastajien kouluttajat 2008. Musiikkialan toimintaympäristöt ja osaamistarve [Institutions and organisations educating professionals in music]. Helsinki, Finland: Sibelius Academy.
29.
PoutiainenA.KivijärviS.KaikkonenM. (2013). Music for all for music – A study of the Resonaari concert audience and equalized interaction. In TirriK.KuusistoE. (Eds.), Interaction in educational domains (pp. 171–181). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Educational Research Association/Sense Publishers.
30.
PutnamR. D. (1993). What makes democracy work?National Civic Review, 82(2), 101–107.
31.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
32.
PutnamR. D. (2009). Diversity, social capital, and immigrant integration: Introductory remarks. National Civic Review, 98(1), 3–5.
33.
Resonaari Soi 2010. (2010). [DVD]. Finland: Resonaari Music Centre & Kala Productions.
34.
RuuskanenP. (2001). Sosiaalinen pääoma – käsitteet, suuntaukset ja mekanismit [Social capital: Concepts, traditions and mechanisms] (VATT-tutkimuksia 81). Helsinki, Finland: Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus.
35.
SahlbergP. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
36.
SealeT.ShawE. M. (2002). Using software to analyse qualitative interviews. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 299–316). London, UK: Sage.
37.
SutelaK.JuntunenM. L.OjalaJ. (2016). Inclusive music education: The potential of the Dalcroze approach for students with special educational needs. Approaches: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Music Therapy, 8(2), 179–188.
38.
UNESCO. (2010). Seoul agenda: Goals for the development of arts education. Paris, France: Author.
39.
VesalaK. M.RantanenT. (Eds.). (2007). Argumentaatio ja tulkinta: Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa [Argumentation and interpretation: The qualitative attitude research approach]. Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.
40.
VäkeväL.KurkelaV. (2012). Rhythm masters: Developing a Master Program in popular music and folk music in provincial areas in Finland. US-China Education Review B2, 244–257.
41.
WarrenC. A. B. (2002). Interviewing as social interaction. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 299–316). London, UK: Sage.
42.
WesterlundH.LehikoinenK.AnttilaE.HouniP.KarttunenS.VäkeväL.… PässiläA. (2016). Taiteet, tasa-arvo & hyvinvointi: Katsaus kansainväliseen tutkimukseen [Arts, equality and well-being: Review on international research]. Helsinki, Finland: University of the Arts & ArtsEqual Consortium.
43.
WilksL. (2011). Bridging and bonding: Social capital at music festivals. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 3(3), 281–297. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2011.5768
44.
WrightR. (2010). (Ed.). Sociology and music education. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
