This article explores the area that spans between the boardwalk and the Limassol Marina to highlight the tensions between two major trends in terms of the constructions of urban spaces worldwide, namely, open public spaces and segre/gated communities. Between them, lies the area of the boardwalk, one of the most successful public spaces in the island in terms of public access, openness, and inclusion. Employing ethnographic methods, this article examines walking in and other uses of these areas. It challenges de Certeau’s binary framework by suggesting that power may be more complex than simply two discrete levels, hence tactics are not a monopoly of the “powerless.” I argue that those striving to be perceived as powerful and “in control” employ a range of “tactics of inhibition” to limit possible uses of space. “Tactical chor(e)ographies” is proposed as an analytical term that can capture these processes.
AlinskyS. D. (1989). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.
2.
AtkinsonR. (2002). Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods?: An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of new urban agenda (Vol. 5). ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
3.
BanerjeeT. (2001). The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9–24.
4.
CresswellT. (1997). Imagining the nomad: Mobility and the postmodern primitive. In BenkoG.StrohmayerU. (Eds.), Space and social theory: Interpreting modernity and postmodernity (pp. 360–379). Blackwell.
5.
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life (RendallS., Trans.) (p. 117). University of California Press.
6.
HarveyD. (1989). The condition of postmodernity (Vol. 14). Blackwell.
7.
HarveyD. (2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development (Vol. 8). Franz Steiner Verlag.
8.
HarveyD. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.
9.
HerzfeldM. (2016). Cultural intimacy: Social poetics and the real life of states, societies, and institutions. Routledge.
10.
HolmesS. (2013). Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States (Vol. 27). University of California Press.
11.
IngoldT. (2010). Footprints through the weather-world: Walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, S121–S139.
12.
KourosT. (2021a). Tactical citizenships: Encounters with everyday state in the Republic of Cyprus [PhD dissertation, University of Cyprus].
13.
KourosT. (2021b). Whose sidewalk? Tactically negotiating the boundary between public and private space in Limassol. Anthropology of Eastern Europe Review, 38(1), 63–78.
14.
KourosT. (2022). Reaping the fruits of informal urbanism: A multi-species ethnography of tactical gardening in public space in Limassol. Built Environment, 48(2), 188–205.
15.
KourosT.PapadakisY. (2018). Religion, immigration, and the role of context: The impact of immigration on religiosity in the Republic of Cyprus. Journal of Religion in Europe, 11(4), 321–347.
16.
KyriakidesT. (2018). Tactics of association. Social Anthropology, 26(4), 471–486.
ListerbornC. (2005). How public can public spaces be?City, 9(3), 381–388.
19.
LowS. M.TaplinD.ScheldS. (2005). Rethinking urban parks: Lessons in culture and diversity. University of Texas Press.
20.
MelucciA.AvritzerL. (2000). Complexity, cultural pluralism and democracy: Collective action in the public space. Social Science Information, 39(4), 507–527.
21.
Merleau-PontyM.SmithC. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
22.
MitchellD. (1995). The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 108–133.
23.
MitchellD. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press.
24.
NapolitanoV.PrattenD. (2007). Michel de Certeau: Ethnography and the challenge of plurality. Social Anthropology, 15(1), 1–12.
