Even though it seems that riding a fixed-gear bike is to take the line of least resistance in search for the optimal flow in between cars, or with respect to traffic arrangements in general, in doing so, fixed-gear cyclists simultaneously reject social conventions of interaction with and within the urban space. Hence, the question emerges: how far can resistance, practical critique, or even social change be detected in fixed-gear cycling and related practices? A motto like “you own a car, not the road” indicates that some fixed-gear cyclists insist on a specific “right to the city”; a claim that particularly criticizes the relationship between drivers and cyclists and also touches upon the further issue of personal mobility centered on the term “urban cycling.” Two practical examples will be discussed to show that such claims are inherently “critical” meanings of the idealized—still bodily enacted—fixed-gear rider and to show the ambivalence and limits of such a critique’s potential.
ABC News. (2014). Bikers dash across Mexico City in illegal Alleycat races. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/fA4qqB8j8Gc
2.
AldredR. (2013). Incompetent or too competent? Negotiating everyday cycling identities in a motor dominated society. Mobilities, 8, 252-271. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.696342
BelligerA.KriegerD. (Eds.). (2006). Anthology: Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie [Anthology: An introductory handbook on actor-network theory]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transkript.
5.
BordenI. (2003). A performative critique of the American city: The urban practice of skateboarding, 1958-1998. In MilesM.HallT.BordenI. (Eds.), The city cultures reader (2nd ed., pp. 291-297). London, England: Routledge.
6.
ButlerJ. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
de CerteauM. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1977). Anti-Ödipus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie I [Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia I]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
13.
DoughtyK.MurrayL. (2014). Discourses of mobility: Institutions, everyday lives and embodiment. Mobilities, 11, 303-322. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
14.
FurnessZ. (2007). Critical mass, urban space and vélomobility. Mobilities, 2, 299-319. doi:10.1080/17450100701381607
15.
FurnessZ. (2010). One less car. Bicycling and the politics of automobility. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
GeorgeD. (2016). Organizing a coincidence: Identity work and activism among local critical mass enthusiasts. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45, 231-255. doi:10.1177/0891241614546554
17.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
GreifM. (Ed.). (2012). Hipster: Eine transatlantische Diskussion [Hipster: A transatlantic discussion]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
19.
HübnerM.EhmannS.KlantenR. (Eds.). (2010). Urban Interventions: Personal projects in public spaces. Berlin, Germany: Die Gestalten Verlag.
20.
IllichE. (1983). Fortschrittsmythen [Myths of progress]. Reinbeck, Germany: Rohwohlt.
21.
JungnickelK.AldredR. (2014). Cycling’s sensory strategies: How cyclists mediate their exposure to the urban environment. Mobilities, 9, 238-255. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.796772
22.
KärrholmM. (2007). A conceptual discussion of territoriality, materiality, and the everyday life of public spaces. Space and Culture, 10, 437-453. doi:10.1177/1206331207304356
23.
KeithM.PileS. (Eds.). (1997). Geographies of resistance. London, England: Routledge.
24.
KidderJ. (2011). Urban flow. Bike messengers and the city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
LarsenJ. (2015). Bicycle parking and locking: Ethnography of designs and practices. Mobilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.993534
26.
LatourB. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
27.
LatourB. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 228-245.
28.
LatourB. (2004a). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205-229. doi:10.1177/1357034X04042943
29.
LatourB. (2004b). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225-248.
30.
Le BretonD. (1995). Lust am Risiko. Von Bungee-jumping, U-Bahn-surfen und anderen Arten, das Schicksal herauszufordern [Lust of risk. From bungee jumping, subway surfing and other ways to challenge fate.]. Frankfurt, Germany: dipa-Verlag.
31.
Le BretonD. (2000). Playing symbolically with death in extreme sports. Body & Society, 6(1), 1-11.
32.
Le BretonD. (2004). The anthropology of adolescent risk-taking behaviours. Body & Society, 10(1), 1-15.
33.
LyngS. (2005). Edgework. The sociology of risk-taking. London, England: Routledge.
34.
ManderscheidK. (2014). Criticising the solitary mobile subject: Researching relational mobilities and reflecting on mobile methods. Mobilities, 9, 188-219. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.830406
35.
MerrimanP. (2014). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9, 167-187. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.784540
36.
MurdochJ. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29, 357-374.
37.
NicoliniD. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organisation: An introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38.
NolandC. (2009). Agency and embodiment. Performing gestures/producing culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
OldenzielR.& de laBruhèzeA. A. (2012). Transfers, 2(2), 22-30. doi:10.3167/tranS.2012.020203
40.
Rauter-NestlerS. (2016). Rehabilitierung durch Remythologisierung? Zur Reinszenierung von Mythen des Radsports in der Fixed-Gear-Szene [Rehabilitation by remythologization? To recreate myths of cycling in the fixed-gear scene]. In Drewes et al.M. (Eds.), (Dis)Positionen Fernsehen & Film [(Dis)positions television & film] (pp. 88-95). Marburg, Germany: Schüren.
SchatzkiT. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
ShoveEPantzarM.WatsonM. (2012). The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. London, England: Sage.
45.
SpinneyJ. A. (2011). Chance to catch a breath: Using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities, 6, 161-182. doi:10.1080/17450101.2011.552771
46.
Stalter-PaceS. (2013). No brakes. Transfers, 3, 176-180. doi:10.3167/tranS.2013.030114
