Renters with pets seeking quality and affordable accommodations face numerous challenges. This research aims to identify whether the racial/ethnic predominance of the neighborhood population relates to the willingness of landlords to accept pets. To address this question, we gathered 266 rental listings from Craigslist and Zillow over a two-week period in Forsyth County, North Carolina. While the vast majority of landlords allowed dogs and cats at rental units in predominantly white neighborhoods, less than half permitted pets at properties in African-American neighborhoods. Chi-square tests demonstrated the statistical significance of these differences. Additional policies including breed restrictions, weight/size limits, non-refundable fees, and additional rent for pets further limited the ability of renters to keep pets. We discuss implications for tenant autonomy, the welfare of companion animals, and the perpetuation of racial segregation.
AmakuM.DiasR. A.FerreiraF. (2010). Dynamics and control of stray dog populations. Mathematical Population Studies, 17(2), 69–78.
2.
AudiracI. (2018). Shrinking cities: An unfit term for American urban policy?. Cities, 75, 1219.
3.
BalanL. U.YerbesI. M.PinaM. A. N.BalmesJ.PascualA.HernándezO.. . . MonteónV. (2011). Higher seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs than in humans in an urban area of Campeche, Mexico. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 11(7), 843–844.
4.
BiseR. D.RodgersJ. C.IIIMaguiganM. A.BeaulieuB.KeithW.MaguiganC. L.MengQ. (2018). Sidewalks as measures of infrastructure inequities. Southeastern Geographer, 58(1), 39–57.
5.
BrooksH.RushtonK.WalkerS.LovellK.RogersA. (2016). Ontological security and connectivity provided by pets: a study in the self-management of the everyday lives of people diagnosed with a long-term mental health condition. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 409.
6.
Carlisle-FrankP.FrankJ. M.NielsenL. (2005). Companion animal renters and pet-friendly housing in the US. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 59–77.
7.
ChettyR.HendrenN. (2016). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility II: County-level estimates (No. w23002). National Bureau of Economic Research.
ClancyE. A.RowanA. N. (2003). Companion animal demographics in the United States: A historical perspective. In SalemD. J.RowanA. N. (Eds.), The state of the animals II: 2003 (pp. 9–26). Humane Society Press.
10.
ClearyM.VisentinD.ThapaD. K.WestS.RaeburnT.KornhaberR. (2020). The homeless and their animal companions: an integrative review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(1), 47–59.
11.
CruiseS. (2011). Reynoldstown: Race, blight, disease, highway construction and the transformation of Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Master’s Thesis, North Carolina State University, 2011, https://catalog.lib.ncsu.edu/record/NCSU2466112.
12.
DesmondM. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. Broadway Books.
13.
DesmondM.GromisA.EdmondsL.HendricksonJ.KrywokulskiK.LeungL.PortonA. (2018). Eviction lab national database: Version 1.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
14.
DickeyB. (2017). Pit bull: The battle over an American icon. Alfred A. Knopf.
15.
Esri. (2018). ArcGIS Online. Environmental Systems Research Institute.
16.
FarmerA. K.DeYoungS. E. (2019). The pets of Hurricane Matthew: Evacuation and sheltering with companion animals. Anthrozoös, 32(3), 419–433.
17.
FlynnC. (2000). Battered women and their animal companions: Symbolic interaction between human and nonhuman animals. Society & Animals, 8(2), 99–127.
18.
FrankenbergE. (2013). The role of residential segregation in contemporary school segregation. Education and Urban Society, 45(5), 548–570.
19.
GeeN. R.MuellerM. K.CurlA. L. (2017). Human–animal interaction and older adults: An overview. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1416.
20.
GrahamT. M.MilaneyK. J.AdamsC. L.RockM. J. (2018). “Pets negotiable”: How do the perspectives of landlords and property managers compare with those of younger tenants with dogs?Animals, 8(3), 32.
21.
GrahamT. M.RockM. J. (2019). The spillover effect of a flood on pets and their people: Implications for rental housing. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 22(3), 229–239.
HartL. A.KiddA. H. (1994). Potential pet ownership in US rental housing. Canine Practice, 19, 24–24.
24.
Herbin-TriantE. A. (2019). Threatening property: Race, class, and campaigns to legislate Jim Crow neighborhoods. Columbia University Press.
25.
HogueS. (2017). Pink is the new bull: The feminization of pit bulls in visual and literary discourses as a rescue tactic.
26.
HuntM. G.SteinC. H. (2007). Who let the dogs in? A pets policy for a supported housing organization. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10(3), 163–183.
27.
KorstadR. R. (2003). Civil rights unionism: Tobacco workers and the struggle for democracy in the mid-twentieth-century South. UNC Press Books.
28.
LinderA. (2018). The black man’s dog: The social context of breed-specific legislation. Animal Law, 25, 51–74.
29.
MarcuseP.MaddenD. (2016). In defense of housing: The politics of crisis. Verso Books.
30.
MasseyD. S.TannenJ. (2015). A research note on trends in black hypersegregation. Demography, 52(3), 1025–1034.
31.
Mayorga-GalloS. (2018). Whose best friend? Dogs and racial boundary maintenance in a multiracial neighborhood. Sociological Forum, 33(2), 505–528.
NastH. J. (2006). Critical pet studies?. Antipode, 38(5), 894–906.
34.
NiesM. A.VollmanM.CookT. (1999). African American women’s experiences with physical activity in their daily lives. Public health nursing, 16(1), 23–36.
35.
O’Reilly-JonesK. (2018). When Fido is amily: How landlord-imposed pet bans restrict access to housing. Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 52, 427–472.
36.
ParkerG. B., et al. Survival following an acute coronary syndrome: a pet theory put to the test. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 121.1 (2010): 65–70.
37.
ParslowR. A.JormA. F.ChristensenH.RodgersB.JacombP. (2005). Pet ownership and health in older adults: Findings from a survey of 2,551 community-based Australians aged 60–64. Gerontology, 51(1), 40–47.
38.
PeacockJ.Chur-HansenA.WinefieldH. (2012). Mental health implications of human attachment to companion animals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 292–303.
39.
PowerE. R. (2017). Renting with pets: a pathway to housing insecurity?. Housing Studies, 32(3), 336–360.
40.
ReeseL. A. (2015). The dog days of Detroit: Urban stray and feral animals. City & Community, 14(2), 167–182.
41.
RoseD. J. (2011). Captive audience? Strategies for acquiring food in two Detroit neighborhoods. Qualitative Health Research, 21(5), 642–651.
42.
Rose-AckermanS. (1977). The political economy of a racist housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 4(2), 150–169.
43.
RossC. E.MirowskyJ. (1999). Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 412–432.
44.
SaundersJ.ParastL.BabeyS. H.MilesJ. V. (2017). Exploring the differences between pet and non-pet owners: Implications for human-animal interaction research and policy. PloS One, 12(6), e0179494.
45.
SiegelJ. M. (2011). Pet ownership and health. In The psychology of the human-animal bond (pp. 167–177). Springer.
46.
ShapiroT.MeschedeT.OsoroS. (2013). The roots of the widening racial wealth gap: Explaining the black-white economic divide. Institute on Assets and Social Policy Research and Policy Brief. Brandeis University: Waltham, MA.
47.
ShoreE. R.PetersenC. L.DouglasD. K. (2003). Moving as a reason for pet relinquishment: A closer look. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(1), 39–52.
SunsteinC. R. (2003). The rights of animals. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70(1), 387–401.
50.
ThomasD. T.VermilyaJ. R. (2019). Framing “friend”: Media framing of “man’s best friend” and the pattern of police shootings of dogs. Social Sciences, 8(4), 1–24.
51.
TissotS. (2011). Of dogs and men: The making of spatial boundaries in a gentrifying neighborhood. City & Community, 10(3), 265–284.
52.
TooheyA. M.RockM. J. (2018). Disruptive solidarity or solidarity disrupted? A dialogical narrative analysis of economically vulnerable older adults’ efforts to age in place with Pets. Public Health Ethics, 12(1), 15–29.
53.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Annual estimates of the resident population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018. https://factfinder.census.gov/.
54.
WeissE.GramannS.SpainC. V.SlaterM. (2015). Goodbye to a good friend: an exploration of the re-homing of cats and dogs in the US. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 5(04), 435.
55.
WilliamsD. R.CollinsC. (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116, 404–416.
56.
WoodL.Giles-CortiB.BulsaraM. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital?Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1159–1173.
