This article argues that home relates not so much to a fixed and clearly bounded spatial “being” but can be understood as a “becoming,” that is, a set of spatial and temporal practices and experiences that fabricate the (un-)canniness of what it means to be at home or not. The (un-)canniness of being at home refers to the mediating and altering relations of changing bodies, emotions, and things that enact the specificities that make up the very feelings and practices of being at home. By retracing the story of a male suffering from two strokes, the authors follow the process of moving from his private house to a nursing home. The ethnographic work presented here tries to highlight the very fragile contingency and normativity of such dynamics concerning the (un-)canniness of being at home.
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
Anderson, P., & Heinlein, M. (2003). Ein Blick in die Alltagspraxis im Pflegeheim: Über Möglichkeiten einer praxisnahen Form von Kundenorientierung [A look into the every day practice of a nursing home: On practice orientated forms of customer orientation]. In D. Sing & E. Kistler (Eds.), Lernfeld Altenpflege: Praxisprojekte zur Verbesserung der Dienstleistung an und mit alten Menschen (pp. 81-97). Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
3.
Berg, M. (1998). Order(s) and disorder(s): Of protocols and medical practices. In M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 226-246). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
4.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.) . Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Dodier, N. (1998). Clinical practice and procedures in occupational medicine: A study of the framing of individuals. In M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 53-85). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
6.
Dunkel, W., & Voß, G. G. (Eds.). (2004). Dienstleistung als Interaktion [Service as interaction]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
7.
Fisher, B.J. (1991). It's not quite like home: Illness career descent and the stigma of living at a multilevel care retirement facility. New York: Garland.
8.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
10.
Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement of the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301-331.
11.
Goffman, E. (1988). Gender advertisement. New York : HarperCollins.
12.
Gröning, K. (1997). Pflege in Zeiten der Fortschritts- und Konsumphilosophie: Qualitätssicherung in der Pflege [Care in a time of philosophies of progress and consumption: Quality assurance in care work]. Mabuse, 108, 29-36.
13.
Gröning, K. (1998). Entweihung und Scham: Grenzsituationen bei der Pflege alter Menschen [Profanation and shame: Extreme situations in caring the elderly]. Frankfurt, Germany: Mabuse.
14.
Gröning, K. (2001). Qualität in der Pflege als Problem der Organisationskulturen. [Quality of care as a problem of organizational cultures]. Pflegemagazin, 1, 38-47.
15.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.
16.
Heinlein, M. (2003). Pflege in Aktion: Zur Materialität alltäglicher Pflegepraxis [Care in action: On the materiality of everyday care work]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
17.
Hetherington, K. (1997). In place of geometry: The materiality of place . In K. Hetherington & R. Munro (Eds.), Ideas of difference: Social spaces and the labour of division (pp. 183-199). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18.
Klie, T. (2005). Pflegeversicherung [Nursing care insurance]. Hanover, Germany: Vincentz.
19.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge.
20.
Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 2, 29-64.
21.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
22.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research . London: Routledge.
23.
Moser, I., & Law, J. (1999). Good passages, bad passages. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 196-219). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
Peper, M. (2000). Pflege als Beziehungsprozess oder das Leiden am Leiden Anderer. [Care as relationship process or the suffering from the suffering of others]. Pflegemagazin, 3, 35-38.
25.
Scheffel, F. (2000). Lebenswelt in der Pflege. Anforderungen an die berufliche Pflege [Life-worlds of care. Demands on care work]. Lage, Germany: Jacobs.
26.
Schillmeier, M. (2007a). Politik des Behindert-Werdens. Behinderung als Erfahrung und Ereignis. [The politics of becoming disabled. Disability as experience and event]. In W. Schneider & A. Waldschmidt (Eds.), Disability studies, Kultursoziologie und Soziologie der Behinderung. Erkundungen in einem neuen Forschungsfeld (pp. 79-99). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
27.
Schillmeier, M. (2007b). Dis/abling spaces of calculation: Blindness and money in everyday life. Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 594-609.
28.
Schillmeier, M. (2007c). Dis/abling practices: Rethinking disability. In Th. Schatzki (Ed.), Action & practice theory [Special Issue]. Human Affairs, 17, 195-208.
29.
Schillmeier, M. (2008a). (Visual) Disability: From exclusive perspectives to inclusive differences. Disability & Society, 23(6), 611-623.
30.
Schillmeier, M. (2008b). Times-spaces of in/dependence and dis/ability . Time & Society, 17(2/3), 215-231.
31.
Schillmeier, M. (2009). Actor-networks of dementia. In M. Schillmeier & J. Latimer (Eds.), Un/ knowing bodies. Oxford , UK: Blackwell pp. 141-160.
32.
Schneekloth, U., & Müller, U. (1999). Wirkungen der Pflegeversicherung [Consequences of the nursing care insurance]. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit (Vol. 127). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
33.
Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
34.
World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Retrieved January30, 2009, http://www.3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm
