Abstract
There is potential to strengthen impact assessment as a tool for Indigenous community use in environmental management. The present research contributes to this discussion by examining the report product that has resulted from 20 recent Cultural Impact Assessments (CIA) in Aotearoa New Zealand. These reports are reviewed based on Vanstone et al.’s structured approach, which allows for a systematic evaluation of the content of reports. The research demonstrates that Cultural Impact Assessment reports can tend to place greater emphasis on cultural values than on impacts of proposed projects, indicating a difference between CIA practice and other forms of impact assessment. CIAs often appear to be less about impact analysis and more about providing an opportunity for Māori concepts and worldviews to be recognized in decision-making. This finding has implications for how CIA report quality should be evaluated in the future and contributes to our understanding of the unique purpose of CIA.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
