Abstract
Background:
Anxiety is common in pediatric patients, especially during vascular access procedures. Most well-studied affect and anxiety scales, including the Observation Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-r), the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS), and the modified Induction Compliance Checklist (mICC), are too cumbersome for clinical use outside of research settings. HRAD± (Happy, Relaxed, Anxious, Distressed with yes/no to cooperation) is a clinically-efficient observational scale that evaluates pediatric procedural affect and cooperation. This study examined the clinical utility of HRAD± during vascular access procedures in children. The aims were to investigate the correlation of HRAD± to highly reliable, research-based affect and cooperation scales and to assess inter-rater reliability (IRR) between observers in this setting.
Methods:
This was a prospective, observational study conducted at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford. Inpatient participants were 1 month to 25 years old and undergoing a peripheral intravenous insertion or phlebotomy. Two trained research assistants (RAs) scored each patient independently during the vascular access procedure using HRAD±, OSBD-r, mYPAS, and mICC. Correlation analyses computed the associations between HRAD± and reference scales. IRR between RAs and vascular access providers was calculated using Fleiss’ Kappa.
Results:
A total of 234 patients were included. HRAD± scores strongly correlated with OSBD-r and mYPAS (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). The cooperation assessment of HRAD± demonstrated strong correlation to mICC (p < 0.0001). IRR of HRAD± between research assistants and vascular access providers showed moderate agreement (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
HRAD± demonstrated strong correlation to the reference affect and cooperation scales. This study supports the utility of HRAD± for rapid assessment of pediatric procedural anxiety and cooperation during vascular access procedures. HRAD± can serve as a practical tool for facilitating clinical decisions, and its wider incorporation into healthcare settings would importantly guide targeted interventions to reduce patient anxiety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
